This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve ARA Piedra Buena (P-36), or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikipedians, I've created this article on this interesting ship of the Argentine Navy based on the online article in the “Histarmar” website, cross-referencing to the one existing in the Russian Wikipedia. I still need to add some citations, for which I’ll need to match against the other books listed in “Bibliography”. I am also looking for additional verifiable sources (especially printed) to further expand this article, especially the "History" section, in the next few weeks; any help will be greatly appreciated. Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 06:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Length and beam are impossible. Overstated. Needs fixing badly. 11 seconds before allowing this to go live was a serious mistake. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Both dimensions were ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, except that had a "decimal comma" as used in Spanish instead of a "decimal point"; sorry for overlooking that. As for the "record" time of its review, is not something that I could manage, so please talk to the reviewer. Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've taken it up with the reviewer. Shit happens. Especially if you do enough editing. No worries. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 23:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks and happy 2016. DPdH (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
Done 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
