Talk:26th Continental Regiment
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 26th Continental Regiment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notes
editArticle reposted after accidental deletion. Dhpage (talk) 22:53, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
Recent changes
edit[copied from my talk page - Magic♪piano 03:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)]
Read with interest the changes you made to this article that I authored. Some questions that came to mind as I read the article:
- Do you think the rewrite has now refocused the article on the final form of the unit, the 9th Massachusetts Regiment, rather than the 26th Continental Regiment?
- Are we certain we want to include the previous and follow on units in the infobox of the article? We already had treated that fairly well in the body of the article.
- Is the paragraph title change "1775 history" you made appropriate? The text of the paragraph deals with 1776.
- Your comment says "prepare to move"? Do you intend to move this article somewhere else under a different title? If so, what is you logic?
- The legacy paragraph about reenactors seems to be only about the 9th Regiment as well.
- Would not a separate article about the 9th MA Regt unit be more appropriate?
Thanks,
Dhpage (talk) 02:51, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- I was looking through all of the regiments in the Massachusetts Line, which have an exceptionally tangled history of numbering and naming. Those that have clear continuity across the various establishments of the Continental Army are, with the exception of the 26th Cont/9th Mass, named for the latest-established name, and also (when they are more than stubs) typically have history that covers all of the establishments, not just one. Given that the 26th is clearly a successor to Gerrish's Regiment and a predecessor to the 9th Mass, one article should be able to cover all of that history, and (for consistency's sake) it should be called "9th Massachusetts Regiment" rather than "26th Continental Regiment". This also makes sense given that the regiment was designated the 9th Mass for a longer period of time. Magic♪piano 03:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 26th Continental Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608052735/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm to http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/mass.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! Dhpage (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)