Talk:2023 Players Championship

Golf Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terminology edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I think we need a better phrase than "was/were not invited" in the field descriptions. These players are no longer eligible to qualify because of their LIV Golf participation. This isn't the Masters were players are invited rather than qualify. Tewapack (talk) 23:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

'Was/were not eligible' would probably be a more appropriate term to me. A note to explain to explain the reason for this would help too. Jimmymci234 (talk) 07:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I thing eligible/ineligible is a better term. As noted, we ought to have an indication of why, LIV and all that. Nigej (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic