This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Is it necessary to have that huge chart of the protected list in here? Doesn't appear to be the norm for past expansion draft articles, and maybe a citation that links to a published article is sufficient? Ultimately I would think that list of who IS drafted, and not who can't be, would be most important after results are announced. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
I kind of agree. Frankly, it should be unprotected players that are shown because they are eligible. LordAtlas (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Agreed, the results of the expansion draft should be the focal point of this article, not the protection lists for the other NHL teams. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1991 NHL Dispersal and Expansion Drafts which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
