This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Instead of tagging the article, why not just edit it and fix the problems.173.216.248.174 (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
In defense of the tag (although I wasn't the one who put it there), at the time the tag was placed there, the story was very new, and not so much information was available other than what the police were saying. I think it was entirely justified to put the tag there to help make sure we stay aware of the fact that balanced and well-sourced information is needed, and that the article shouldn't be here unless the topic has enduring notability. —BarrelProof (talk) 01:26, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Well, clearly no attempt has been made to fix it. I don't have the time to go over all the research and rewrite it. Libertarian12111971 (talk) 06:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
This article somehow dropped off of my Watchlist for a while. I missed the entire discussion about deleting it. At the time I created the article, I was convinced it would be a major case with persisting substantial notability. Now more than a year has gone by with seemingly no follow-up press coverage whatsoever. I really wonder what has happened since last June. Probably some public record exists, but the topic has completely disappeared from the press. It's amazing how fleeting the attention span of the press can sometimes be. We don't know whether there has been a trial or a plea or whether some trial has been scheduled for the future or the charges have been completely dropped. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:11, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
