Talk:2008 United States presidential election in Arkansas

Untitled edit

Arkansas is arguably the only state where racist voting could have been important enough to make a difference in the overall winner... AnonMoos (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

County Results edit

This article needs the detailed county results like every other state election article. --Jerzeykydd (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on United States presidential election in Arkansas, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United States presidential election in Arkansas, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Obama got 14,122; not 14,955 votes in Faulkner County, Arkansas edit

This is also fully confirmed to be the case. Basically when in the process of transcribing the votes in a precinct named "Harve" to the now removed official results site, someone accidentially added an extra digit to Obamas total, incorrectly giving him 925 votes when his actual total was just 92 votes, an 833 vote difference. It makes perfect sense that this correction is needed; said precinct infact had a population lower than its reported vote total for Obama, and was broadly Republican in other elections both before and after, including many where the county and state as a whole were far more competitive, yet was reported as giving Obama about 80% of the vote. What confirms this is that the now delisted site also included listings of the total number of voters who showed up in each precinct in many counties, including this county. The sum of voters who showed up for every single race in this precinct except for the Presidential race was reported to be identical, as it should be, because people either show up to cast a ballot that lists every race in a precinct, or fail to show up. However, the total number of voters who showed up for the Presidential race was reported as a number 833 votes higher, with Obama the only candidate getting as many or more votes in the precinct as the error in question indicated were accidentially added. MappedTables (talk) 22:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply