Talk:2008 Astana season

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article2008 Astana season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow editors to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or on the nomination page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Cheers JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 00:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I ask for slight leniency on the seven day hold. I only recently was able to get back online after my computer was stolen from me three days before your review. I'll get right on your comments, but I have three other GA reviews to look at, too. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
It's fine, I'm not going to fail the article if there is progress on it. Plus this is a very good article and I've been very pedantic on it and more or less wanting your opinion on some parts of it. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Great, thanks. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 08:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2008 Astana season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    This article will be on hold for a period of 7 days. Please try and fix the problems listed below. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 00:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article issues

edit
  • Clarify - but did not obtain a meaningful result in any of them - What's a meaningful result? Maybe a podium finish would be more appropriate wording?
True, it is poorly defined. It just means that they didn't get a stage win, classification (jersey) win, or finish on the final podium. It seemed wordy to say all of that. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Grammar - In April, the team got found great success in the Vuelta al País Vasco - Doesn't make sense.
Vestige of revising the sentence during composition or when further information is later found. These are sometimes hard for me to find myself. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Clarify - The team sent squads to the Tour de Pologne, Tour de l'Ain, Tour of Ireland, and the Eneco Tour, but did not obtain a meaningful result in any of them. - See above.   Done
Right, any suggestion? Should I include that whole sentence? Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps just change meaningful result to podium finish? JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
The wording you just edited in is good. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Pedantic grammar - Six days before the race began, RCS Sport (the organizers of the Giro) reversed themselves and invited Astana - Is there a better way to word this? Reading it, it just sounds a little weird.
Any suggestion? Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't know, reversed themselves to maybe changed their decision? Or something similar. It could quite well be very good English and my grasp of the language might be poor :P. If you think it's fine, I can't see a too bigger problem. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well, "reversed themselves" is a (fairly) common English phrase, but I'm not married to it if it seems to bring down the quality of the prose. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 09:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Revised to Six days before the race began, RCS Sport (the organizers of the Giro) went back on the decision to exclude Astana and extended them a late invitation.
  • NPOV - The finale to the Giro was anything but competitive, as Riccò was 68th on the stage, losing close to two minutes to Contador and his solid, consistent 11th place ride. - The sentence doesn't have a direct citation, therefore I believe it must be the next line, which doesn't state anything about the race being anything but competitive. Try and avoid peacock words like 'solid, consistent' if it is not stated in a reference.
I guess I'll revise, but the truth is, by those facts, that the Giro's final stage indeed was not competitive for the purposes of the final pink jersey. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Revised to Riccò was unable to challenge Contador in the Giro's finale, finishing 68th on the stage and losing close to two minutes to Contador, who was 11th.
  • Abbreviations - Following several stages won by sprinters and breakaways, the next test for the GC riders When abbreviating a word, introduce that word with the abbreviations in brackets first. For example Brisbane Boys College (BBC) was created in 1994. Some famous BBC students are John Smith. etc.   Done
Good catch, accessibility and such. If it's not spelled out more fully earlier in the text (I honestly don't remember, and I don't have the article up right now), this should say something like ...test for riders aiming for high places in the General classification (GC) Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ok cool, fixed it for you. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Citation - On June 26, the team fired Vladimir Gusev for "irregular values" when quoting, direct citation is needed. It sucks, but is part of WP:CITE.
Well, words to that effect were certainly used by the team at the time. I'll try to find the exact words. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Actually, the use of "irregular values" is present in the citation at the end of the paragraph, but I added another for good measure, along with a little reword and a citation for Dr. Damsgaard. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 00:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Contractions - I've fixed this, but in future, avoid contractions such as couldn't as per MOS WP:CONTRACTION.   Done
Ehh, this is something I have a hard time catching, as I don't get hung up on it (see! I don't "do not get hung up on it"). I'll try, though.

Thanks for the comments, now to revise the article. Alex finds herself awake at night (Talk · What keeps her up) 07:50, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article summary

edit

Lead

  • Fine

One-day races

Stage races

  • Grammar and NPOV need fixing
    • NPOV, really? That surprises me a little. I don't particularly even like this team (aside from supporting Leipheimer and Armstrong as much as any American cycling fan does by default), so I'm curious as to where I was too positive. I don't think I could have been too negative, as the article definitely focuses more on positive results than negative, but that's just a function of what's written about and what's not. Aside from colossal disappointments, like Carlos Sastre in this year's Tour de France (which made me a saaaaad panda), negative results usually aren't written about. And the fact is, especially in a three week Grand Tour but even in shorter stage races, chances are a team will win something.
  • Sentencing need grammar checks
I think the grammar has been checked now, I could not find grammar mistakes (although that does not mean anything...) --EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Grand tours

  • Abbreviations need clarifying
I believe they have been clarified.--EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Away from competition

  • Direct quote needs citation
Alex has added citations.--EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Season victories quick reference

  • Perhaps this can just be shortened to a section heading of Season victories?
    • Here's the thing - I'm not wild about this section at all. I can kinda see its merits, but by the time I get to writing an article about Team Columbia–HTC for this season, this section is going to be draaaaaaaag city, because they've had close to 80 stage victories this year. It also shouldn't give any information that isn't also present in the article prose. So is the section's title the only issue you have with it? I really pulled it out of thin air after User:Severo added one to 2009 Astana season, which I actually wrote first but obviously can't be a GA just yet (2009 season isn't over), but Severo didn't put a section header on it.
I can't see any problem with the extra content, it's up to you whether you keep it or not for the future. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 12:31, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

References

  • Fine

Images

If there are any questions or comments on the review, please post them on this page. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 00:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


Apologies for inactivity, this article looks good to go now! Thank you for your patience =] JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 08:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2008 Astana season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2008 Astana season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2008 Astana season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply