Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cycling

Latest comment: 5 days ago by Fyunck(click) in topic Major RfC on capitalization of all our articles

WikiProject iconCycling Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Gino Mäder Edit

The cyclist Gino Mäder, who died today after a crash during the Tour de Suisse, is nominated for Recent Deaths at then main page. Any help will be appreciated.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Content assessment Edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Content assessment#Proposal: Reclassification of Current & Future-Classes as time parameter, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. This WikiProject received this message because it currently uses "Current" and/or "Future" class(es). There is a proposal to split these two article "classes" into a new parameter "time", in order to standardise article-rating across Wikipedia (per RfC), while also allowing simultaneous usage of quality criteria and time for interest projects. Thanks! CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 21:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cycling news Reliable source? if yes, Which would be right article? Edit

I came across following 2 news articles. Whether those amount to reliable sources and if yes, which is the right article to add info in. Bookku (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bookku (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Cycling Weekly is owned by Future plc and their brands are considered to be reliable. Other than that, I do not know more about these sources. Cheers, Vacant0 (talk) 14:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
From reading the British Cycling article it seems to be a reliable source Chidgk1 (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Major RfC on capitalization of all our articles Edit

I thought this was a done deal back in this 2022 RFC but obviously not. A handful of editors did another rfc with no sports projects input at all. And it's being challenged because we just noticed it. This could affect almost every single tennis and Olympic article we have, and goodness know how many other sports. Some may have already been moved it you weren't watching the article. And not just the article titles will be affected but all the player bios that link to the articles. Sure the links would be piped to the right place if thousands of articles moved, but if the wording in a bio still said 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles or Swimming at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre backstroke that would likely need to be changed by hand. There is also talk of removing the ndash completely.

Perhaps this is what sports projects want and perhaps not. Either way I certainly don't want projects ill-informed as the last RfC was handled. Express your thoughts at the following rfc. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]