Talk:2003 Football League Second Division play-off final

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2003 Football League Second Division play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 21:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Glad to notice that a lower-league play-off final is is at GAN. Will be posting comments soon. MWright96 (talk) 21:16, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

General

• Be consistent in how you present Queens Park Rangers: i.e. it should be just one term and not two as you use currently (QPR and Rangers)

Lead

• "The redevelopment of Wembley Stadium meant that Football League play-off final matches were played in Cardiff between 2001 and 2006." - meant that Football League play-off final matches held between 2001 and 2006 were played in Cardiff.
• "who finished fourth during the league season, and Cardiff City, who finished sixth. " - reptition of finished

Route to the final

• "finishing between 3rd and 6th to enter the play-offs" - numbers between three to six should be spelt out per MOS:NUMBERS
• "Rangers midfielder Richard Langley equalised before being sent off with ten minutes remaining after a second bookable offence" - what was the circumstance that led to Langley's sending-off?

Pre-match

• ""a club game, not an international fixture." - missing the closing quotation marks in this section of text
• "First Minister of Wales Rhodri Morgan criticised the decision commenting that anthems shouldn't be a part of the match but if they were then both should be played." - should not
• "striker Paul Furlong stated that he believed" - try stated his belief to make it slightly less wordy
• "Cardiff chairman Hammam stated before the game" - you don't need to mention that Hamman was chairman of Cardiff shortly after another paragraph
• "However, Holloway rubbished Hammam's call" - Rubbished is informal

Summary

• " QPR goalkeeper Chris Day produced an impressive save" - Per WP:PEACOCK, avoid words such as impressive

References

• Refs 15 & 18 should have HighBeam Research as the source of your information

Overall a good neat work you have piece together. Only just the prose copy-edit and reference nibbles from my end. MWright96 (talk) 14:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thanks very much for the review, I've sorted the issues you raised above. Kosack (talk) 15:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

• @Kosack: Lovely, am now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 15:58, 1 March 2018 (UTC)