Talk:2002 Macau Grand Prix

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Macau Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 14:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this one, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 14:17, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Initial review

Lead

• "The Grand Prix was won ASM Formula 3 driver Tristan Gommendy" > was won by Formula 3...
  • Done though I have reworded the team name to ASM Formule 3 as it stated in the ibox and race results tables. MWright96 (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
• "Montin avoided stalling at the start of the second leg and lost his pole position advantage", I'm a little unsure of what this signifies. Surely avoiding stalling isn't notable? Also, how did not stalling make him lose his advantage?

Background and entry list

• Link Guia Circuit.

Practice and qualifying

• "humid weather conditions but it was delayed for ten minutes due", could probably drop it from this sentence.
• "Katsuyuki Hiranaka blocked the track at the Melco hairpin when he got stranded across the turn and marshals got his car facing correctly", sentence is a little clunky perhaps. Maybe replace the first got with became? Also should it be until marshals got his car...?
• "The fastest time set by each driver from either session counted towards his final starting position for Sunday's race. The fastest time set by each driver from either session counted towards his final starting position for the race on Sunday", are these sentences the same?
• "second 30 practice session" > 30 minute?

Warm-up

• "20 warm-up session" > 20 minute?
• "second behind in the third position", is the necessary here?

Leg 1

• "but they were more calmer than before", I think that should either be calmer or more calm.
• "only for the Japanese to respond and retaining his hold on third" > retain his hold?
• There's a few different spellings of Matsuura in this section.

Leg 2

• Link armco barrier to Traffic barrier.

References

• All of the references seem to be working and support the relevant material. No significant copyvio concerns reported.

A nice piece of work, a few minor issues listed above but nothing major. Placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 19:48, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

• • @Kosack: Have taken action on all of the above points and have replied to the first query. MWright96 (talk) 06:45, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

All of my above concerns addressed and I have corrected some minor typos. I'm happy that this meets the relevant GA criteria. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 19:31, 3 May 2019 (UTC)