Talk:1st Brigade (Ireland)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Dead link edit
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.roscrea.ie/content.asp?section=237
- In 1 Southern Brigade on 2011-05-25 06:49:40, 404 Not Found
- In 1 Southern Brigade on 2011-06-09 12:26:41, 404 Not Found
Dead link 2 edit
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.irishmilitaryonline.com/army/units/main.php?id=home
- In 1 Southern Brigade on 2011-05-25 06:49:40, 404 Not Found
- In 1 Southern Brigade on 2011-06-09 12:27:12, 404 Not Found
Shoulder Flash name edit
I noticed the old designation for the shoulder flashes were being used on both articles for the brigades even though the brigades no longer have geographical designations any more. So instead of '1st (Southern) Brigade you just have now '1st Brigade'. Similarly instead of '2nd (Eastern) Brigade' you now have just '2nd Brigade'. The shoulder flashes, while the same as the old brigades now identify with the new brigades. DojoIrl (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Facilites edit
The article lists the various civil/infrastructure facilities (airports/etc) that the Brigade is responsible for protecting. This is cited, and absolutely reasonable and appropriate to include. However, I don't see why we need to add a subjective/relative adjective like "important" to the statement. It doesn't add material/factual context for the reader, and it skirts WP:NPOV, WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV and WP:WTW for the project to be making value judgements on the readers behalf. (A reader will see four large transport infrastructure examples listed, and will make their own determination on importance.) In this vein, and ss per WTW, we should surely "let facts alone do the talking"(?) Guliolopez (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Resolved - By adding quotes around text (to cover WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV concern). Guliolopez (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
