Talk:1889–90 Sheffield United F.C. season

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good article1889–90 Sheffield United F.C. season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 30, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:1889–90 Sheffield United F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just minor changes needed, otherwise happy to pass:

Season overview

  • "With a team assembled over the summer months United played their first..." place comma between months and United
  • Well-financed should be hyphenated, given that it isn't postpositive.
  • "taking on Birmingham St. George's" → "against Birmingham St. George's"
  • "it had become clear that a better quality of player", should that be plural? "better quality players" – especially given there is no 'I' in team.
  • "Ironically their first two new signings were a Scot" place comma between 'Ironically' and 'their'
  • Remove wiklink on FA Cup heading
  • "...another Lancashire side in the next round; Bolton Wanderers..." replace semicolon with em or en dash

Appearances and goals

  • Nationality not available for 'T. Wilson' I'd imagine?

On hold for seven days. Lemonade51 (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

I've done all the changes as above. As per T. Wilson yes, it looks a bit odd that he has no nationality but there isn't really an elegant way of doing 'unknown' in that format. It's a pretty good bet that he'll have been English as the most likely source would be an amateur player from the local leagues, but then again he could be one of the random Scots that United were keen on signing at that time. Unfortunately as it was against the rules to play him the club presumably decided to hide his identity so I figured it's best not to draw a conclusion that I can't really reference. I've added the note ref link against him in that list though to help clarify. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 06:58, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Anon edit

in the FA Cup Fourth qualifying round the goal scorer is Anon but there is no player in the team of this name. Is it an own goal or is the player unknown. Whichever I think that some note needs to be made to explain the situation. Keith D (talk) 11:24, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

The scorer was not recorded - I've switched these from 'Anonymous' to 'Unknown' which is probably more correct anyway.Bladeboy1889 (talk) 11:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Probably a better solution. Keith D (talk)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1889–90 Sheffield United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Reply