Template talk:Horizontal timeline
Increment in scale rows
edit
Moved from Module talk:Horizontal timelineThe default increment in a scale row is a fifth of the range, which can look wierd sometimes. How about a suitable multiple of 10^n or 2*10^n? Kanguole 10:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
row-from does not work
editDoes not row-from work? I tried making a timeline, but it didn't seem to have any affect. -- Frap (talk) 16:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Frap, Is this what you want to do? Please do leave me a message in my talk page if you want any changes or assistance in this template. Thank you. --Jayarathina (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Negative numbers
edit Moved from Module talk:Horizontal timelineIt would be nice if the template produced correct typographic minuses (−) instead of hyphens (-) for negative numbers. It seems that changing
local negativeFmt = getNotNilValue(args['axis-negativeFmt'], '-%s')
to
local negativeFmt = getNotNilValue(args['axis-negativeFmt'], '−%s')
should do that, but I have not looked closely at the code to understand all cases. @Jayarathina: could you please check and modify it properly? — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, That should do it. I have changed it as per your recommendation. --Jayarathina (talk) 04:08, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Timeline in other languages?
editI noticed Simple Horizontal timeline does not work in Portuguese-language Wikipedia pages. Is there a way to work around this limitation, or does it need an administrative implementation before we can use it in other languages? Arqpalazzo (talk) 13:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 2 February 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2020 (UTC) UPDATE: After moving "Module:Horizontal timeline", a massive script error occurred. I've self-reverted the move for the "Module" page which resolved the issue. The move for the module page might have to be performed @WIKIDATA. Overall, I was only able to move the template. Jerm (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Simple Horizontal timeline → Template:Simple horizontal timeline
- Module:Horizontal timeline → Module:Simple horizontal timeline
– Match name with template; remove excessive capitalization. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:58, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support Sure, it's a slightly better name. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Support: Remove extra capitalisation to maintain uniformity as in other existing templates. — The Ultimate Let's Talk 08:34, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
@Jerm: I've gone ahead and successfully moved the module; the problem was that you didn't update the template to call the module by its new name. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 10 September 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Primefac (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Primefac (talk) 19:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Simple horizontal timeline → Template:Horizontal timeline
- Module:Simple_horizontal_timeline → Module:Horizontal timeline
– There is nothing that this is simpler than, because Template:Horizontal timeline was redirected here * Pppery * it has begun... 18:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Something has impacted this template
editG'day Izno. The usage of this template, in all the places it is used, is showing some errors in the published live versions. Specifically, some text is aligning left unnecessarily. For example look at the two timelines above. Some borders on the left have also been impacted, again visible in the above timelines. I tagged you since you made the last edit in the concerned timeframe, however I wouldn't be able to say if that was the cause. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 08:55, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)