Gateway of India
The Gateway of India is an arch-monument built in the early twentieth century in the city of Mumbai, in the Indian state of Maharashtra. It was erected to commemorate the landing in December 1911 at Apollo Bunder, Mumbai (then Bombay) of King-Emperor George V and Queen-Empress Mary, the first British monarch to visit India. At the time of the royal visit, the gateway was not yet built, and a cardboard structure greeted the monarch. The foundation stone was laid in March 1913 for a monument built in the Indo-Saracenic style, incorporating elements of 16th-century Gujarati architecture. The final design of the monument by architect George Wittet was sanctioned only in 1914, and construction was completed in 1924. The structure is a triumphal arch made of basalt, which is 26 metres (85 feet) high.
|Gateway of India|
|Construction started||31 March 1913|
|Inaugurated||4 December 1924|
|Owner||Archaeological Survey of India|
|Height||26 m (85 ft)|
|Diameter||15 metres (49 feet)|
|Design and construction|
|Architecture firm||Gammon India|
After its construction the gateway was used as a symbolic ceremonial entrance to British India for important colonial personnel. It has been called a symbol of "conquest and colonisation" commemorating British colonial legacy. The gateway is also the monument from where the last British troops left India in 1948, following Indian independence. It is located on the waterfront at an angle, opposite the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower Hotel and overlooks the Arabian Sea. Today, the monument is synonymous with the city of Mumbai, and is amongst its prime tourist attractions. The gateway is also a gathering spot for locals, street vendors, and photographers soliciting services. It holds significance for the local Jewish community as it has been the spot for Hanukkah celebrations, with the lighting of the menorah, since 2003. There are five jetties located at the gateway, of which two are used for commercial ferry operations.
The gateway was the site of a terror attack in August 2003, when there was a bomb blast in a taxi parked in front of it. Access to the gateway was restricted after people congregated at its premises following the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, in which the Taj Hotel opposite the gateway and other locations in its vicinity were targeted.
In March 2019, the Maharashtra state government proposed a four-step plan to develop the location for the convenience of tourists, following a direction issued by the state governor in February 2019.
History and significanceEdit
The gateway was built to commemorate the arrival of George V, Emperor of India and Mary of Teck, Empress consort, in India at Apollo Bunder, Mumbai (then Bombay) on 2 December 1911 prior to the Delhi Durbar of 1911; it was the first visit of a British monarch to India. However, they only got to see a cardboard model of the monument,[A] as construction did not begin until 1915. The foundation stone for the gateway was laid on 31 March 1913 by then governor of Bombay, Sir George Sydenham Clarke with the final design of George Wittet for the gateway sanctioned in August 1914. Before the gateway's construction, Apollo Bunder used to serve a native fishing ground. Between 1915 and 1919 work continued at the Apollo Bunder to reclaim the land on which the gateway was to be built, along with the construction of a sea wall. Gammon India had undertaken construction work for the gateway.[B] Its foundations were completed in 1920 while construction was finished in 1924. The gateway was opened to the public on 4 December 1924 by then viceroy, Rufus Isaacs, 1st Marquess of Reading. Following Indian independence, the last British troops to leave India, the First Battalion of the Somerset Light Infantry, passed through the gateway with a 21-gun salute, as part of a ceremony on 28 February 1948, signalling the end of the British Raj.[C]
N. Kamala, professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University, refers to the gateway as a "jewel in the crown" and a "symbol of conquest and colonisation".[D] The monument commemorates the legacy of British colonial rule, namely the first visit of a British monarch to India and its use as an entry point for prominent colonial personnel into British India. Today the gateway is synonymous with the city of Mumbai.[E] Since its construction, the gateway has remained amongst the first structures visible to visitors arriving in Bombay by the sea.[G]
Since 2003, the gateway has been the location for the local Jewish community to light the menorah for Hanukkah celebrations every year. This ritual was started by Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg of the chabad in Mumbai (located in Nariman House). It also became a site for prayers following the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks which targeted, amongst others, Nariman House. Rabbi Holtzberg lost his life in the 2008 terror attacks.
Design and architectureEdit
The gateway's arch has a height of 26 metres (85 feet) with its central dome being 15 metres (49 feet) in diameter. The monument is built of yellow basalt and reinforced concrete. The stones were sourced locally while the perforated screens were brought in from Gwalior. The monument faces towards the Mumbai Harbour. There are four turrets on the structure of the gateway, and there are steps constructed behind the arch of the gateway which lead to the Arabian Sea. The monument features intricate stone latticework (also known as the jali work). The Scottish architect, George Wittet combined elements of the Roman triumphal arch and 16th-century architecture of Gujarat.[H] The architecture also combines indigenous architectural elements with elements of Islamic architecture, known as the Indo-Saracenic. The harbour front was realigned in order to make an esplanade, which would sweep down to the centre of the town. On each side of the arch, there are large halls with the capacity to hold 600 people. The cost of the construction was ₹21 lakhs (two million one hundred thousand rupees), borne by the then government. Due to a paucity of funds, the approach road was never built. Hence, the gateway stands at an angle to the road leading up to it.
In February 2019, Seagate Technology and CyArk embarked on a mission to digitally record and preserve the gateway, by digital scanning and archiving of the monument. The images and data collected will be used to make photo-real three dimensional models. This is a part of CyArk's international programme for digitally preserving heritage monuments. It involves aerial surveys conducted with terrestrial laser scanning (LiDAR), drones, and photogrammetry exercises. The drawings and three-dimensional models will inform any future reconstruction works.
Location and jettiesEdit
The gateway stands at an angle, opposite to the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower Hotel, which was built in 1903. In the grounds of the gateway, opposite the monument, stands the statue of Shivaji, the Maratha warrior-hero who fought against the Mughal empire to establish the Maratha empire in the 17th century. The statue was unveiled on 26 January 1961 on the occasion of India's Republic Day. It replaced a bronze statue of King-Emperor George V which stood at its place.[I] In 2016, Mid Day reported that the George V statue is kept locked in a tin shed belonging to the Public Works Department, behind Elphinstone College, in Fort, Mumbai. The George V statue was sculpted by G. K. Mhatre, who has over 300 sculptures to his credit in India. Hemant Pathare, Mhatre's great-grandson and Sandeep Dahisarkar, a historian, researcher, and academician, have made efforts to relocate the George V statue to a museum, the latter of whom has reasserted the statue as swadeshi art. The other statue in the locality of the gateway is that of Swami Vivekananda, an Indian monk who is credited as a key figure in the introduction of Indian philosophies such as Vedanta and Yoga to the west, and with bringing Hinduism to the status of a major world religion during the late 19th century.[J]
There are five jetties located around the monument. The first jetty is exclusive to the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, while the second and third are used for commercial ferry operations, the fourth one is closed, and the fifth is exclusive to the Royal Bombay Yacht Club. The second and third jetties are the starting point for tourists to reach the Elephanta Caves, which are fifty minutes away by boat from the monument. Other routes from the gateway include ferry rides to Rewas, Mandwa, and Alibaug, while cruises also operate from the gateway. These ferries reportedly carry an overload of daily passengers. The Mumbai Port Trust licenses vessels to use the gateway while the Maharashtra Maritime Board issues fitness certificates to them.
Tourism and developmentEdit
The gateway is amongst the prime tourist attractions in Mumbai. The gateway is a protected monument in Maharashtra under the aegis of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). It is a regular gathering place for locals, street vendors, and photographers.[K] In 2012, the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation moved the Elephanta Festival of Music and Dance from its original location at Elephanta Caves — where it had been celebrated for 23 years — to the gateway, due to the increased capacity offered by the venue. The gateway can host 2,000 to 2,500 people, whereas Elephanta Caves could host only 700 to 800.
By the year 2012, the Bombay Municipal Corporation increased the plaza area around the gateway for pedestrians by restoring the area at a cost of ₹5 crores. It involved the cutting down of trees, reducing the garden area, replacing toilets, and closing the car park. The redevelopment led to a dispute between the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH) and the Urban Design Research Institute, and the government was criticised for poor project implementation which critics alleged had failed to conform to the original plans.
In January 2014, Philips Lighting India, in association with the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation, undertook the expenditure of ₹2 crores to illuminate the gateway, by installing an LED lighting system with sixteen million shades. Philips used products from its Philips Color Kinetics and LED street lighting, and did not receive any branding for the illumination project in which 132 light points were created, which were reportedly sixty-percent more energy efficient than the old lighting system. In August 2014, the state Directorate of Archaeology and Museums had proposed conservation of the gateway by the ASI, after noting deterioration caused by saline deposits from the sea. An estimate of costs was to be prepared and approved by the ASI. The last such conservation had been undertaken twenty years earlier. An independent study had earlier been conducted at the gateway, between June 2001 and May 2002, aimed at informing future conservation of the monument understanding the degree of colour changes of stones owing to seasonal weather conditions and saturated colour of minerals. The study found the stones of the monument to appear darker during monsoon than during other seasons while the colour change in the inner portions of the monument rises with variations of seasonal humidity and temperature, given they do not face the sea, rainwater, or sunlight. It concluded with the finding that the alteration degree and overall colour change in the inner portions are higher than those in the outer portions of the monument.
In 2015, the Maharashtra Maritime Board and the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority approved a proposal to construct a passenger jetty near Apollo Bunder and a promenade between the gateway and the Bombay Presidency Radio Club. The project was aimed at reducing crowding at the gateway by closing all its jetties and refocusing the location solely as a tourist attraction.
The gateway has interested companies and corporate houses such as the Tata Group, the RPG Group, and the JSW Group, who have expressed their wish to maintain the gateway and enhance its facilities. This happened after the state government identified 371 heritage sites under its Maharashtra Vaibhav State Protected Monuments Adoption Scheme (MVSPMAS). Under this scheme, companies and corporates can adopt heritage monuments and give out funds for their maintenance, to satisfy their corporate social responsibility. The scheme also provides sponsors with the opportunity to generate revenue by selling their rights to feature the heritage monuments in commercials and advertisements. Other revenue-generating opportunities include the sale of entry tickets to the site and charging for the use of facilities.
In February 2019, the Maharashtra state government initiated a plan to restore, clean, and beautify the monument. A project plan was to be prepared in a month. The state governor, C. Vidyasagar Rao, directed the Bombay Municipal Corporation commissioner and architects to submit a project plan in a month on measures to be taken for the purpose. In the same month, chemical conservation was proposed by the state archaeology department noting blackening of and algae on stones and surface cracks. Structural stability audit had last been conducted eight years earlier with plant growth on the monument removed annually. In March 2019 the state government agreed on a four-stage plan to manage tourists visiting the site. This involved the physical conservation of the monument, the installation of a sound-and-light show, the relocation of the anchorage around the monument and a streamlined, ticketed entry system. The plan followed UNESCO guidance for protected heritage sites and took into account the views of interested parties, including the Directorate of Museums and Archaeology, which has the monument within its purview; the Mumbai Port Trust, which is entrusted with the land; and the Bombay Municipal Corporation, which controls the location. The task of coming up with a suitable management plan was delegated to architects.
Events and incidentsEdit
The gateway was the location of a terror attack on 25 August 2003, when there was a bomb blast in front of it. The force of the explosion, from a bomb in a taxi parked near the Taj Mahal hotel, reportedly threw bystanders into the sea. On 13 August 2005, a mentally unstable man stabbed two young girls from Manipur at the gateway premises. On New Year's Eve, 2007 a woman was groped by a mob at the gateway.
Following the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks, which targeted the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower Hotel opposite to the gateway, among other locations, crowds of people including news television reporters and cameramen congregated at the gateway premises. Subsequently, public access to the area around was restricted. Fearing further attacks on the gateway and on the Elephanta caves, the state government proposed the closure of all of the jetties at the gateway and their replacement with two new piers, to be built near the Bombay Presidency Radio Club. In response to the terror attacks, a solidarity march was held at the gateway premises on 3 December 2008.
In February 2019, protests were organised at the premises in the wake of the Pulwama attack. In January 2020, the gateway became a site of spontaneous protests that commenced overnight, under the name of "Occupy Gateway", in the aftermath of the attack on Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi. Protestors were later relocated from the gateway premises to Azad Maidan in Mumbai to ease the movement of traffic and people.
- While Dupée (2008) notes that the king and queen passed through a "temporarily constructed mock cardboard and pastiche structure", de Bruyn et al. (2008) note the same simply as a "fake cardboard structure".
- Gammon India claims to have done India's first pre-cast reinforced concrete piling for the foundations of the gateway.
- Morris (2005) writes about the gateway, "This was where the British landed: and this where, in the end, they left. The Gateway of India did not see many ceremonial arrivals after all, during its three decades under British rule, but it formed the background to one historical departure — the last parade with which, in 1947, the British said goodbye to their Indian Empire."
- Kamala (2000) writes, "Through the Gateway, the imperial traveller could perceive in his mind's eye the vision of a subject-nation, a nation constructed and processed in and for his gaze. As Tejaswini Niranjana points out, one of the professed aims of English education was to give the colonized, "along with the English language, models of national culture" (1992, 107), the stated objectives being to "give a liberal English education to the middle and upper classes, in order that we may furnish them with both the materials and models for the formation of a national literature" (Trevelyan 1838, 175). While various notions of India—indeed, various Indias—may have pre-existed British colonization, this one monolithic nation, India, was constructed only in English translation. The Gateway of India looked outward, welcoming the colonizer, a symbol and facilitator of appropriation, but it also looked inward, bringing a people together (and driving them apart) as they dutifully defined their nation in the curiously perceived neutrality of the English language."
- The gateway has also been featured in films shot in or with stories based in Mumbai. Ranjani Mazumdar (2010), referring to the 1989 Indian film Parinda, writes, "In a city where the rich and poor live cheek by jowl, where disenchantment is the experience of the majority, Mumbai Noir has become synonymous with urban decay, crime, claustrophobia, and an assortment of characters marked by some sort of death wish...Karan is soon sucked into a vortex of violence in a narrative that consciously uses Mumbai's familiar locations like the Gateway of India, the Babulnath Temple, the fountains and various abandoned factories...Urban space is not just the backdrop but a central character in the film and the use of the Gateway of India to stage a bloody climax paved the way for a new imagination of violence."
There is also a 1957 Indian film titled Gateway of India featuring the monument, starring Madhubala and Om Prakash.
- Referring to the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel located opposite the gateway, both visible together from the sea.
- Tindall (1992) writes, "If Bombay is, as some think, an Indian city with a Western façade, then the Gateway and the Taj[F] are this façade in spite of their determinedly oriental opulence." While Dupée (2008) writes, "The city's dramatical imperial arch graced the harbor's approach, lending substance to the characterization that Bombay was the "gateway" or "front door" to the subcontinent, not unlike, according to one author, the Arc de Triomphe's as entryway into the city of Paris...The arch of honey-colored basalt was not completed until 1924, but once erected it became for travellers the city's dominant architectural icon. The Taj Mahal Hotel, situated nearby, also faced the harbour, commanding a stunning view of the sea and, dependent upon the traveller's aesthetic tastes, lending an imposing grandeur to the city's image." Yet Monojit (1997) notes, "Visible from way out at sea, it was the first sight of normality in what was to be an alien land...Today, the Gateway is a favourite promenade spot for thousands of Bomabyites...the Gateway that once symbolised Imperial rule still symbolises the city's closeness to the West, its contact with the outside world."
- Bandyopadhyay et al. (2008) write, "The Indian government's efforts in this portrayal of the Hindu heritage is nowhere more prominent than the mention of the Gateway of India architecture in Mumbai...it was stressed that though the British rulers designed the Gateway, it was according to the Gujarat (one of the Indian states) style."
- McGarr (2015) writes, "In July 1959, in Bombay, moves were set in train to replace a statue of George V, which stood next to the Gateway of India on the city’s waterfront, with a ﬁgure of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, a renowned Maratha warrior. As one of the best-known royal statues in India, the decision elicited strong feelings among those on both sides of the statues debate. One British expatriate living in Bombay, wrote to the editor of The Times of India to decry ‘the limits [to] which petty-mindedness and nationalistic feeling can be carried’. Back in London, William Haley, editor of The Times, echoed such sentiment...Haley wrote to a friend, ‘this business of removing statues is really rather nonsense. Rather like un-writing history in George Orwell’s 1984. What is done is done and there is no reason for the Indians to be ashamed of it...When will man-kind grow up?’ Ofﬁcial Indian sentiment, however, had begun to turn decisively against the retention of British statues in public locations. In September 1961, in Maharashtra (a new state carved from the former Bombay presidency along linguistic lines) a committee established to look into the retention of British monuments reported that none of the state’s British statues could be regarded as offensive to Indian nationalism, and extremely few had been defaced. Nonetheless, the committee recommended the progressive replacement of British iconography with that ‘more in consonance with the sense of patriotism and nationalism which has developed since the attainment of Independence in 1947’...In Calcutta, municipal authorities announced that statues of Lord Lawrence and Queen Victoria, which stood in prominent positions in the heart of the city, would be replaced by ﬁgures of the Indian nationalist icons...Only in New Delhi, it seemed, was a nationwide trend towards the removal of British statuary. The continued presence of British iconography in India’s capital was shortly, however, to become a matter of contentious political debate."
- Bandyopadhyay et al. (2008), referring to the renaming of colonial names of cities and locations, write, "...although the Gateway is associated with colonial heritage, which the Indian government also embraces, it wants to make a point that the Hindus were not short of renowned leaders/personalities (here in the case of two statues, Swami Vivekananda who is arguably India's greatest spiritual celebrity, and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj who was arguably one of the country's most respected Hindu rulers). This resistance, it can be argued is targeted in opposition to the Western colonial influence which...is a "psychological state resulting from suppressed feelings of envy and hatred."
In 2017, Bharatiya Janata Party member Raj K. Purohit, who has held six terms in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, demanded the gateway to be renamed "Bharat Dwaar" (the Hindi translation of "the gateway of India") to ensure an "Indian name" for the monument and to let go of India's "colonial hangover". He further claimed the monument to be a "symbol of slavery".
- Morris (2005) writes, "Today the Gateway of India has forgotten all its pompous or elegiac meanings and is a place of pleasure, habitually thronged, inside and out, by companionable crowds out for the sea air. The liners no longer come from Londond, and the only boats around the pier are pleasure crafts touting trips around the harbour, or excursions to the Elephanta Caves. It is a merry place, an ice-cream place...".
Notes and news reportsEdit
- Dupée, Jeffrey N. 2008, p. 114.
- Anthony Hewitt 1993, p. 173.
- Timothy H. Parsons 2014, p. 3.
- de Bruyn, Pipa 2008, p. 92.
- de Bruyn, Pipa 2010, p. 92.
- Sharada DwivediRahul Mehrotra1999, p. 42.
- Gillian Tindall 1992, p. 6-7.
- Renu Saran 2014, ch. on 'Gateway of India.
- B. Karunakar 2011, ch. on 'Gammon India Ltd.'.
- "Landmark Projects". www.gammonindia.com. Archived from the original on 19 February 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- Sharada DwivediRahul Mehrotra 1995, p. 118.
- Sharada DwivediRahul Mehrotra 1995.
- Robert W. Bradnock 1994.
- Jan Morris 2005, p. 195.
- "N. Kamala". jnu.ac.in. Jawaharlal Nehru University. Retrieved 19 September 2019.
- SimonSt-Pierre 2000, p. 245, chpt. 13.
- Tejaswini Niranjana 1992, p. 107.
- Charles Edward Trevelyan 1838, p. 175.
- SimonSt-Pierre 2000, p. 245.
- Bose, Mrityunjay (21 February 2019). "Gateway of India to be digitally preserved". Deccan Herald. Mumbai. Archived from the original on 13 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- Kulkarni, Dhaval; Shaikh, Ateeq (25 September 2015). "Passenger jetty, promenade planned at Apollo Bunder". Daily News and Analysis. Archived from the original on 9 December 2015. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- Helio San Miguel 2012, chpt. on 'Mumbai Noir'.
- Deepa Gahlot2015, chpt. on 'Gateway of India (1957)'.
- Chatterji, Monojit 1997, pp. 233-234.
- Gillian Tindall 1992, p. 12.
- Chatterji, Monojit 1997, p. 233.
- Iyer, Kavitha (21 December 2014). "Hanukkah lights up at Gateway of India, with a wish to spread light and love". Indian Express. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- Doyle, Kit (14 December 2018). "Photos of the Week". Religion News Service. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- "Baby Moshe's grandparents in Mumbai, to conduct prayers". Hindustan Times. 25 December 2008. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- P. K. Agrawal2018, chpt. on ' Gateway of India.
- Melody S. Mis 2004, p. 42.
- Jagir Singh BajwaRavinder Kaur 2007, p. 240.
- Sarina Singh 2010, pp. 783-784.
- Chakravarthi Raghavan, Mumbai - Cultural Life at the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Shobhna Gupta2003, p. 111.
- Bandyopadhyay, Ranjan 2008, p. 801.
- Kirpal Sigh Annie Mathew, p. 8.
- Karangutkar, Suyash (22 February 2019). "Digitally recreating the Gateway of India". The Hindu. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- "Seagate partners with CyArk to digitally preserve the Gateway of India". Economic TImes. 21 February 2019. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- Jaisinghani, Bella (21 February 2019). "Pvt firms scan every square cm of Gateway of India to 'digitally preserve' the monument". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 31 July 2019. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- de Bruyn, Pipa 2010, p. 125.
- Berlitz 2017.
- B.K. Chaturvedi 2002, p. 146.
- Bombay Civic Journal 1975, p. 59.
- Civic Affairs 1961, p. 91.
- Bombay Civic Journal 1975, p. 39.
- Civic Affairs 1961, p. 86.
- McGarr, Paul M. 2015, p. 814.
- Puranik, Apoorva (7 April 2016). "Mumbai: Sculptor's kin seek to save King George V from shabby PWD shed". Mid Day. Archived from the original on 26 July 2017. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- A. K. Bag 2001, p. 83.
- Bombay State Road Transport Corporation 1958, p. 36.
- Ajoy Kumar Sen1991, p. 320.
- Sharada DwivediRahul Mehrotra 1999, p. 47.
- Narasingha Prosad Sil 1997.
- Rawal, Swapnil (11 June 2017). "BJP MLA in Mumbai wants Gateway of India renamed to 'Bharatdwar'". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 13 November 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
- "Rename Gateway of India as Bharat Dwaar: BJP MLA". Deccan Herald. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 20 June 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- Thakkar, Dharmesh (27 January 2009). "Gateway of India jetties to move location". NDTV. Archived from the original on 12 February 2011. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- DK Travel 2014, p. 450.
- "Mumbai heritage week: Revisiting a lost culture in the city of caves". Daily News and Analysis. 18 April 2012. Archived from the original on 27 June 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2012.
- "5 jetties may be shut". Daily News and Analysis. 29 January 2009. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- "Disaster floats at gateway". Mid Day. 2 October 2011. Archived from the original on 8 March 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- Rawal, Swapnil (1 November 2018). "Jetty off Nariman Point to give easier access to proposed mid-sea Shivaji Memorial". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 17 September 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- "Gateway of India: 9 facts you should know". India Today. 4 December 2018. Archived from the original on 15 August 2019. Retrieved 15 August 2019.
- "Protected Monuments in Maharashtra". asi.nic.in. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 23 September 2019.
- Tembhekar, Chittaranjan; Jaisinghani, Bella (5 March 2012). "Elephanta festival 'moves' to Gateway of India". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 10 January 2014. Retrieved 30 April 2012.
- "Festival weaves magic". The Indian Express. Mumbai. Express News Service. 27 March 2012. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
- Lewis, Clara (18 March 2012). "Gateway not quite a getaway". Times of India. Archived from the original on 10 January 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- "Philips shows the light at the Gateway of India". Afaqs. 24 January 2019. Archived from the original on 16 August 2019. Retrieved 16 August 2019.
- Rao, Srinath Raghvendra (11 August 2014). "Consider chemical conservation of Gateway, state tells ASI". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 14 July 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
- Tiwari, L. B. 2005, pp. 788-789.
- Tiwari, L. B. 2005, pp. 793-794.
- Tiwari, L. B. 2005, p. 794.
- Naik, Yogesh (13 January 2015). "With jetty at Apollo Bunder, Gateway to be clutter-free". Mumbai Mirror. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- Kumar, Shiv (26 July 2019). "Gateway of India, other Maha monuments up for adoption by corporates". The Tribune. Archived from the original on 13 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- Kulkarni, Dhaval (6 May 2018). "Only 2 of 371: Maharashtra's adopt-a-monument scheme a Maha flop". Daily News and Analysis. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- "Mumbai's iconic Gateway of India to be restored and beautified". The Financial Express. Mumbai. 7 February 2019. Archived from the original on 13 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- "Submit report on preserving Gateway: Governor". The Asian Age. 8 February 2019. Archived from the original on 13 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- "Maharashtra govt plans to beautify Gateway of India". The Hindu. 7 February 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- "Plan to use chemicals to restore Gateway's sheen". The Times of India. 9 February 2019. Archived from the original on 10 February 2019. Retrieved 24 September 2019.
- "Mumbai's iconic Gateway of India is all set to get some ground rules". Times Travel. 12 March 2019. Archived from the original on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- Kulkarni, Dhaval (11 March 2019). "Mumbai: Light-&-sound show, low entry fee to push Gateway tourism". Daily News and Analysis. Archived from the original on 13 August 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2019.
- Singh, Jagmeet (27 August 2019). "Snapchat's Landmarkers Feature Enters India, Lens Studio 2.1 Released With New Templates". NDTV Gadgets 360.com. Archived from the original on 28 August 2019. Retrieved 29 August 2019.
- Brenner, Marie (30 September 2009). "Anatomy of a Siege". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on 13 July 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- "2003: Bombay rocked by twin car bombs". BBC. 25 August 2003. Archived from the original on 10 April 2012. Retrieved 16 April 2012.
- "Maniac stabs girl to death at Gateway". The Times of India. 14 August 2005. Archived from the original on 18 January 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2005.
- "Gateway groping shocks Mumbai". The Times of India. 3 January 2007. Archived from the original on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 3 January 2007.
- Leadbeater, Chris (30 November 2013). "After the terrorist attacks: The gateway to India is open to the world". Independent. Archived from the original on 14 August 2019. Retrieved 14 August 2019.
- Tharoor, Ishaan (3 December 2008). "A Rally in Mumbai: "Remember 26-11!"". Time. Archived from the original on 2 December 2015. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- "Show of solidarity at Gateway of India". Times of India. PTI. 3 December 2008. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- "Pulwama attack: Mumbaikars show solidarity with CRPF martyrs". Business Standard. PTI. 16 February 2019. Archived from the original on 16 February 2019. Retrieved 20 September 2019.
- Johari, Aarefa (6 January 2020). "At #OccupyGateway, Mumbai citizens have been protesting in solidarity with JNU for over 16 hours". Scroll. Archived from the original on 18 February 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- Sheth, Himani (7 January 2020). "Mumbai protest: Protesters evicted from Gateway of India and relocated to Azad Maidan". Hindustan Times. Archived from the original on 8 January 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
- "JNU violence: Protestors 'relocated' from Gateway of India to Azad Maidan to avoid inconvenience to citizens, claims Mumbai Police". Firstpost. Press Trust of India. 7 January 2020. Archived from the original on 8 January 2020. Retrieved 18 April 2020.
Books and journalsEdit
- Civic Affairs. P. C. Kapoor at the Citizen Press. 1961.
- The Bombay Civic Journal. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. 1975.
- A. K. Bag (2001). History of Technology in India. Indian National Science Academy.
- Ajoy Kumar Sen (1991). Tourism in India. Modern Book Agency.
- Anthony Hewitt (1993). Corridors of Time: Distant Footsteps Through the Empire 1914-1948. Pentland. ISBN 978-1-85821-092-6.
- B.K. Chaturvedi (2002). Tourist Centers Of India. Diamond Pocket Books (P) Ltd. ISBN 978-81-7182-137-2.
- B. Karunakar (7 December 2011). Corporate Champions: Excellent Companies of India. SAGE Publishing India. ISBN 978-81-321-1919-7.
- Bandyopadhyay, Ranjan; et al. (2008). "Religion and identity in India's heritage tourism". Annals of Tourism Research. 35 (3): 790–808. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2008.06.004.
- Berlitz (1 August 2017). Berlitz Pocket Guide India. Apa Publications. ISBN 978-1-78573-058-0.
- Bombay State Road Transport Corporation (1958). State Transport Review. 9.
- Chakravarthi Raghavan, Mumbai - Cultural Life at the Encyclopædia Britannica
- Charles Edward Trevelyan (1838). On the Education of the People of India. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green & Longmans.
- Chatterji, Monojit (1997). "Gateway to the globe". The World Today. 53 (8/9): 233–234. JSTOR 40475975.
- DK Travel (1 October 2014). DK Eyewitness Travel Guide India. Dorling Kindersley Limited. ISBN 978-0-241-01348-9.
- de Bruyn, Pipa; et al. (4 March 2008). Frommer's India. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470556108.
- de Bruyn, Pipa; et al. (2010). Frommer's India. Wiley. ISBN 9780470556108.
- Deepa Gahlot (1 October 2015). Take-2: 50 Films That Deserve a New Audience. Hay House, Inc. ISBN 978-93-84544-85-0.
- Dupée, Jeffrey N. (2008). Traveling India in the Age of Gandhi. University Press of America. ISBN 9781461693116.
- Gillian Tindall (1992). City of Gold: The Biography of Bombay. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-009500-5.
- Helio San Miguel (21 September 2012). World Film Locations: Mumbai. Intellect Books. ISBN 978-1-84150-679-1.
- Jagir Singh Bajwa; Ravinder Kaur (2007). Tourism Management. APH Publishing. ISBN 978-81-313-0047-3.
- Jan Morris (2005). Stones of Empire: The Buildings of the Raj. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280596-6.
- Kirpal Sigh Annie Mathew. Middle School Social Sciences. Frank Brothers. ISBN 978-81-8409-103-8.
- McGarr, Paul M. (2015). "'The Viceroys are Disappearing from the Roundabouts in Delhi': British symbols of power in post-colonial India". Modern Asian Studies. 49 (3): 787–831. doi:10.1017/s0026749x14000080.
- Melody S. Mis (15 December 2004). How to Draw India's Sights and Symbols. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc. ISBN 978-1-4042-2732-3.
- Narasingha Prosad Sil (1997). Swami Vivekananda: A Reassessment. Susquehanna University Press. ISBN 978-0-945636-97-7.
- P. K. Agrawal (2018). Indian Culture, Art and Heritage. Prabhat Prakashan. ISBN 978-93-5266-926-4.
- Renu Saran (19 August 2014). Monuments of India. Diamond Pocket Books Pvt Ltd. ISBN 978-93-5165-298-4.
- Sarina Singh (15 September 2010). Lonely Planet India. Lonely Planet Publications. ISBN 978-1-74220-347-8.
- Sharada Dwivedi; Rahul Mehrotra (1995). Bombay: The Cities Within. India Book House. ISBN 978-81-85028-80-4.
- Sharada Dwivedi; Rahul Mehrotra (1999). Fort walks: around Bombay's Fort area. Eminence Designs. ISBN 978-81-900602-3-3.
- Simon, Sherry; St-Pierre, Paul (2000). Changing the Terms: Translating in the Postcolonial Era. University of Ottawa Press. ISBN 978-0-7766-0524-1.
- Shobhna Gupta (2003). Monuments of India. Har-Anand Publications. ISBN 978-81-241-0926-7.
- Robert W. Bradnock (1994). South Asian Handbook. Trade & Travel Publications.
- Tejaswini Niranjana (8 January 1992). Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-91136-9.
- Timothy H. Parsons (7 August 2014). The Second British Empire: In the Crucible of the Twentieth Century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4422-3529-8.
- Tiwari, L. B.; et al. (2005). "Weathering impact on the colour of building stones of the 'Gateway of India' monument". Environmental Geology. 48 (6): 788–794. Bibcode:2005EnGeo..48..788T. doi:10.1007/s00254-005-0020-4. S2CID 128691054.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Gateway of India.|