The Elements (Greek: Στοιχεῖα Stoikheîa) is a mathematical treatise consisting of 13 books attributed to the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid c. 300 BC. It is a collection of definitions, postulates, propositions (theorems and constructions), and mathematical proofs of the propositions. The books cover plane and solid Euclidean geometry, elementary number theory, and incommensurable lines. Elements is the oldest extant large-scale deductive treatment of mathematics. It has proven instrumental in the development of logic and modern science, and its logical rigor was not surpassed until the 19th century[citation needed] .

Title page of Sir Henry Billingsley's first English version of Euclid's Elements, 1570. During the Renaissance, Euclid was commonly conflated with the philosopher Euclid of Megara.
LanguageAncient Greek
Subjectplane and solid geometry, number theory, incommensurable lines
Publication date
c. 300 BC
Pages13 books

Euclid's Elements has been referred to as the most successful[a][b] and influential[c] textbook ever written. It was one of the very earliest mathematical works to be printed after the invention of the printing press and has been estimated to be second only to the Bible in the number of editions published since the first printing in 1482,[1] the number reaching well over one thousand.[d] For centuries, when the quadrivium was included in the curriculum of all university students, knowledge of at least part of Euclid's Elements was required of all students. Not until the 20th century, by which time its content was universally taught through other school textbooks, did it cease to be considered something all educated people had read.[citation needed]


A fragment of Euclid's Elements on part of the Oxyrhynchus papyri
Double-page from the Ishaq ibn Hunayn's Arabic Translation of the Elements. Iraq, 1270. Chester Beatty Library

Basis in earlier work

An illumination from a manuscript based on Adelard of Bath's translation of the Elements, c. 1309–1316; Adelard's is the oldest surviving translation of the Elements into Latin, done in the 12th-century work and translated from Arabic.[2]

Scholars believe that the Elements is largely a compilation of propositions based on books by earlier Greek mathematicians.[3]

Proclus (412–485 AD), a Greek mathematician who lived around seven centuries after Euclid, wrote in his commentary on the Elements: "Euclid, who put together the Elements, collecting many of Eudoxus' theorems, perfecting many of Theaetetus', and also bringing to irrefragable demonstration the things which were only somewhat loosely proved by his predecessors".

Pythagoras (c. 570–495 BC) was probably the source for most of books I and II, Hippocrates of Chios (c. 470–410 BC, not the better known Hippocrates of Kos) for book III, and Eudoxus of Cnidus (c. 408–355 BC) for book V, while books IV, VI, XI, and XII probably came from other Pythagorean or Athenian mathematicians.[4] The Elements may have been based on an earlier textbook by Hippocrates of Chios, who also may have originated the use of letters to refer to figures.[5] Other similar works are also reported to have been written by Theudius of Magnesia, Leon, and Hermotimus of Colophon.[6][7]

Transmission of the text


In the 4th century AD, Theon of Alexandria produced an edition of Euclid which was so widely used that it became the only surviving source until François Peyrard's 1808 discovery at the Vatican of a manuscript not derived from Theon's. This manuscript, the Heiberg manuscript, is from a Byzantine workshop around 900 and is the basis of modern editions.[8] Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 29 is a tiny fragment of an even older manuscript, but only contains the statement of one proposition.

Although Euclid was known to Cicero, for instance, no record exists of the text having been translated into Latin prior to Boethius in the fifth or sixth century.[2] The Arabs received the Elements from the Byzantines around 760; this version was translated into Arabic under Harun al-Rashid (c. 800).[2] The Byzantine scholar Arethas commissioned the copying of one of the extant Greek manuscripts of Euclid in the late ninth century.[9] Although known in Byzantium, the Elements was lost to Western Europe until about 1120, when the English monk Adelard of Bath translated it into Latin from an Arabic translation.[e] A relatively recent discovery was made of a Greek-to-Latin translation from the 12th century at Palermo, Sicily. The name of the translator is not known other than he was an anonymous medical student from Salerno who was visiting Palermo in order to translate the Almagest to Latin. The Euclid manuscript is extant and quite complete.[11]

After the translation by Adelard of Bath (known as Adelard I), there was a flurry of translations from Arabic. Notable translators in this period include Herman of Carinthia who wrote an edition around 1140, Robert of Chester (his manuscripts are referred to collectively as Adelard II, written on or before 1251), Johannes de Tinemue,[12] possibly also known as John of Tynemouth (his manuscripts are referred to collectively as Adelard III), late 12th century, and Gerard of Cremona (sometime after 1120 but before 1187). The exact details concerning these translations is still an active area of research.[13][page needed] Campanus of Novara relied heavily on these Arabic translations to create his edition (sometime before 1260) which ultimately came to dominate Latin editions until the availability of Greek manuscripts in the 16th century. There are more than 100 pre-1482 Campanus manuscripts still available today.[14][15]

Euclidis – Elementorum libri XV Paris, Hieronymum de Marnef & Guillaume Cavelat, 1573 (second edition after the 1557 ed.); in 8:350, (2)pp. THOMAS–STANFORD, Early Editions of Euclid's Elements, n°32. Mentioned in T.L. Heath's translation. Private collection Hector Zenil.

The first printed edition appeared in 1482 (based on Campanus's translation),[16] and since then it has been translated into many languages and published in about a thousand different editions. Theon's Greek edition was recovered and published in 1533[17] based on Paris gr. 2343 and Venetus Marcianus 301.[18] In 1570, John Dee provided a widely respected "Mathematical Preface", along with copious notes and supplementary material, to the first English edition by Henry Billingsley.

Copies of the Greek text still exist, some of which can be found in the Vatican Library and the Bodleian Library in Oxford. The manuscripts available are of variable quality, and invariably incomplete. By careful analysis of the translations and originals, hypotheses have been made about the contents of the original text (copies of which are no longer available).

Ancient texts which refer to the Elements itself, and to other mathematical theories that were current at the time it was written, are also important in this process. Such analyses are conducted by J. L. Heiberg and Sir Thomas Little Heath in their editions of the text.

Also of importance are the scholia, or annotations to the text. These additions, which often distinguished themselves from the main text (depending on the manuscript), gradually accumulated over time as opinions varied upon what was worthy of explanation or further study.


A page with marginalia from the first printed edition of Elements, printed by Erhard Ratdolt in 1482

The Elements is still considered a masterpiece in the application of logic to mathematics. In historical context, it has proven enormously influential in many areas of science. Scientists Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei, Albert Einstein and Sir Isaac Newton were all influenced by the Elements, and applied their knowledge of it to their work.[19][20] Mathematicians and philosophers, such as Thomas Hobbes, Baruch Spinoza, Alfred North Whitehead, and Bertrand Russell, have attempted to create their own foundational "Elements" for their respective disciplines, by adopting the axiomatized deductive structures that Euclid's work introduced.

The austere beauty of Euclidean geometry has been seen by many in western culture as a glimpse of an otherworldly system of perfection and certainty. Abraham Lincoln kept a copy of Euclid in his saddlebag, and studied it late at night by lamplight; he related that he said to himself, "You never can make a lawyer if you do not understand what demonstrate means; and I left my situation in Springfield, went home to my father's house, and stayed there till I could give any proposition in the six books of Euclid at sight".[21][22] Edna St. Vincent Millay wrote in her sonnet "Euclid alone has looked on Beauty bare", "O blinding hour, O holy, terrible day, / When first the shaft into his vision shone / Of light anatomized!". Albert Einstein recalled a copy of the Elements and a magnetic compass as two gifts that had a great influence on him as a boy, referring to the Euclid as the "holy little geometry book".[23][24]

The success of the Elements is due primarily to its logical presentation of most of the mathematical knowledge available to Euclid. Much of the material is not original to him, although many of the proofs are his. However, Euclid's systematic development of his subject, from a small set of axioms to deep results, and the consistency of his approach throughout the Elements, encouraged its use as a textbook for about 2,000 years. The Elements still influences modern geometry books. Furthermore, its logical, axiomatic approach and rigorous proofs remain the cornerstone of mathematics.

In modern mathematics


One of the most notable influences of Euclid on modern mathematics is the discussion of the parallel postulate. In Book I, Euclid lists five postulates, the fifth of which stipulates

If a line segment intersects two straight lines forming two interior angles on the same side that sum to less than two right angles, then the two lines, if extended indefinitely, meet on that side on which the angles sum to less than two right angles.

The different versions of the parallel postulate result in different geometries.

This postulate plagued mathematicians for centuries due to its apparent complexity compared with the other four postulates. Many attempts were made to prove the fifth postulate based on the other four, but they never succeeded. Eventually in 1829, mathematician Nikolai Lobachevsky published a description of acute geometry (or hyperbolic geometry), a geometry which assumed a different form of the parallel postulate. It is in fact possible to create a valid geometry without the fifth postulate entirely, or with different versions of the fifth postulate (elliptic geometry). If one takes the fifth postulate as a given, the result is Euclidean geometry.[citation needed]


  • Book 1 contains 5 postulates (including the infamous parallel postulate) and 5 common notions, and covers important topics of plane geometry such as the Pythagorean theorem, equality of angles and areas, parallelism, the sum of the angles in a triangle, and the construction of various geometric figures.
  • Book 2 contains a number of lemmas concerning the equality of rectangles and squares, sometimes referred to as "geometric algebra", and concludes with a construction of the golden ratio and a way of constructing a square equal in area to any rectilineal plane figure.
  • Book 3 deals with circles and their properties: finding the center, inscribed angles, tangents, the power of a point, Thales' theorem.
  • Book 4 constructs the incircle and circumcircle of a triangle, as well as regular polygons with 4, 5, 6, and 15 sides.
  • Book 5, on proportions of magnitudes, gives the highly sophisticated theory of proportion probably developed by Eudoxus, and proves properties such as "alternation" (if a : b :: c : d, then a : c :: b : d).
  • Book 6 applies proportions to plane geometry, especially the construction and recognition of similar figures.
  • Book 7 deals with elementary number theory: divisibility, prime numbers and their relation to composite numbers, Euclid's algorithm for finding the greatest common divisor, finding the least common multiple.
  • Book 8 deals with the construction and existence of geometric sequences of integers.
  • Book 9 applies the results of the preceding two books and gives the infinitude of prime numbers and the construction of all even perfect numbers.
  • Book 10 proves the irrationality of the square roots of non-square integers (e.g.  ) and classifies the square roots of incommensurable lines into thirteen disjoint categories. Euclid here introduces the term "irrational", which has a different meaning than the modern concept of irrational numbers. He also gives a formula to produce Pythagorean triples.[25]
  • Book 11 generalizes the results of book 6 to solid figures: perpendicularity, parallelism, volumes and similarity of parallelepipeds.
  • Book 12 studies the volumes of cones, pyramids, and cylinders in detail by using the method of exhaustion, a precursor to integration, and shows, for example, that the volume of a cone is a third of the volume of the corresponding cylinder. It concludes by showing that the volume of a sphere is proportional to the cube of its radius (in modern language) by approximating its volume by a union of many pyramids.
  • Book 13 constructs the five regular Platonic solids inscribed in a sphere and compares the ratios of their edges to the radius of the sphere.
Summary Contents of Euclid's Elements
Definitions 23 2 11 7 18 4 22 16 28 131
Postulates 5 5
Common Notions 5 5
Propositions 48 14 37 16 25 33 39 27 36 115 39 18 18 465

Euclid's method and style of presentation


• "To draw a straight line from any point to any point."
• "To describe a circle with any center and distance."

Euclid, Elements, Book I, Postulates 1 & 3.[26]

An animation showing how Euclid constructed a hexagon (Book IV, Proposition 15). Every two-dimensional figure in the Elements can be constructed using only a compass and straightedge.[26]
Codex Vaticanus 190

Euclid's axiomatic approach and constructive methods were widely influential.

Many of Euclid's propositions were constructive, demonstrating the existence of some figure by detailing the steps he used to construct the object using a compass and straightedge. His constructive approach appears even in his geometry's postulates, as the first and third postulates stating the existence of a line and circle are constructive. Instead of stating that lines and circles exist per his prior definitions, he states that it is possible to 'construct' a line and circle. It also appears that, for him to use a figure in one of his proofs, he needs to construct it in an earlier proposition. For example, he proves the Pythagorean theorem by first inscribing a square on the sides of a right triangle, but only after constructing a square on a given line one proposition earlier.[27]

As was common in ancient mathematical texts, when a proposition needed proof in several different cases, Euclid often proved only one of them (often the most difficult), leaving the others to the reader. Later editors such as Theon often interpolated their own proofs of these cases.

Euclid's presentation was limited by the mathematical ideas and notations in common currency in his era, and this causes the treatment to seem awkward to the modern reader in some places. For example, there was no notion of an angle greater than two right angles,[28] the number 1 was sometimes treated separately from other positive integers, and as multiplication was treated geometrically he did not use the product of more than 3 different numbers. The geometrical treatment of number theory may have been because the alternative would have been the extremely awkward Alexandrian system of numerals.[29]

The presentation of each result is given in a stylized form, which, although not invented by Euclid, is recognized as typically classical. It has six different parts: First is the 'enunciation', which states the result in general terms (i.e., the statement of the proposition). Then comes the 'setting-out', which gives the figure and denotes particular geometrical objects by letters. Next comes the 'definition' or 'specification', which restates the enunciation in terms of the particular figure. Then the 'construction' or 'machinery' follows. Here, the original figure is extended to forward the proof. Then, the 'proof' itself follows. Finally, the 'conclusion' connects the proof to the enunciation by stating the specific conclusions drawn in the proof, in the general terms of the enunciation.[30]

No indication is given of the method of reasoning that led to the result, although the Data does provide instruction about how to approach the types of problems encountered in the first four books of the Elements.[4] Some scholars have tried to find fault in Euclid's use of figures in his proofs, accusing him of writing proofs that depended on the specific figures drawn rather than the general underlying logic, especially concerning Proposition II of Book I. However, Euclid's original proof of this proposition, is general, valid, and does not depend on the figure used as an example to illustrate one given configuration.[31]



Euclid's list of axioms in the Elements was not exhaustive, but represented the principles that were the most important. His proofs often invoke axiomatic notions which were not originally presented in his list of axioms. Later editors have interpolated Euclid's implicit axiomatic assumptions in the list of formal axioms.[32]

For example, in the first construction of Book 1, Euclid used a premise that was neither postulated nor proved: that two circles with centers at the distance of their radius will intersect in two points.[33] Later, in the fourth construction, he used superposition (moving the triangles on top of each other) to prove that if two sides and their angles are equal, then they are congruent; during these considerations he uses some properties of superposition, but these properties are not described explicitly in the treatise. If superposition is to be considered a valid method of geometric proof, all of geometry would be full of such proofs. For example, propositions I.2 and I.3 can be proved trivially by using superposition.[34]

Mathematician and historian W. W. Rouse Ball put the criticisms in perspective, remarking that "the fact that for two thousand years [the Elements] was the usual text-book on the subject raises a strong presumption that it is not unsuitable for that purpose."[28]



It was not uncommon in ancient times to attribute to celebrated authors works that were not written by them. It is by these means that the apocryphal books XIV and XV of the Elements were sometimes included in the collection.[35] The spurious Book XIV was probably written by Hypsicles on the basis of a treatise by Apollonius. The book continues Euclid's comparison of regular solids inscribed in spheres, with the chief result being that the ratio of the surfaces of the dodecahedron and icosahedron inscribed in the same sphere is the same as the ratio of their volumes, the ratio being  

The spurious Book XV was probably written, at least in part, by Isidore of Miletus. This book covers topics such as counting the number of edges and solid angles in the regular solids, and finding the measure of dihedral angles of faces that meet at an edge.[f]


The Italian Jesuit Matteo Ricci (left) and the Chinese mathematician Xu Guangqi (right) published the first Chinese edition of Euclid's Elements (Jīhé yuánběn 幾何原本) in 1607.
Proof of the Pythagorean theorem in Byrne's The Elements of Euclid and published in colored version in 1847.




  1. 1570, Henry Billingsley
  2. 1651, Thomas Rudd
  3. 1660, Isaac Barrow
  4. 1661, John Leeke and Geo. Serle
  5. 1685, William Hallifax
  6. 1705, Charles Scarborough
  7. 1708, John Keill
  8. 1714, W. Whiston
  9. 1756, Robert Simson
  10. 1781, 1788 James Williamson
  11. 1781, William Austin
  12. 1795, John Playfair
  13. 1826, George Phillips
  14. 1828, Dionysius Lardner
  15. 1833, Thomas Perronet Thompson
  16. 1862, Isaac Todhunter
  17. 1908, Thomas Little Heath (revised in 1926) from Johan Ludvig Heiberg's edition
  18. 1939, R. Catesby Taliaferro

Other languages

  • 1505, Bartolomeo Zamberti [de] (Latin)
  • 1543, Nicolo Tartaglia (Italian)
  • 1557, Jean Magnien and Pierre de Montdoré, reviewed by Stephanus Gracilis (Greek to Latin)
  • 1558, Johann Scheubel (German)
  • 1562, Jacob Kündig (German)
  • 1562, Wilhelm Holtzmann (German)
  • 1564–1566, Pierre Forcadel [fr] de Béziers (French)
  • 1572, Commandinus (Latin)
  • 1575, Commandinus (Italian)
  • 1576, Rodrigo de Zamorano (Spanish)
  • 1594, Typographia Medicea (edition of the Arabic translation of The Recension of Euclid's "Elements"[39])
  • 1604, Jean Errard [fr] de Bar-le-Duc (French)
  • 1606, Jan Pieterszoon Dou (Dutch)
  • 1607, Matteo Ricci, Xu Guangqi (Chinese)
  • 1613, Pietro Cataldi (Italian)
  • 1615, Denis Henrion (French)
  • 1617, Frans van Schooten (Dutch)
  • 1637, L. Carduchi (Spanish)
  • 1639, Pierre Hérigone (French)
  • 1651, Heinrich Hoffmann (German)
  • 1663, Domenico Magni (Italian from Latin)
  • 1672, Claude François Milliet Dechales (French)
  • 1680, Vitale Giordano (Italian)
  • 1689, Jacob Knesa (Spanish)
  • 1690, Vincenzo Viviani (Italian)
  • 1694, Ant. Ernst Burkh v. Pirckenstein (German)
  • 1695, Claes Jansz Vooght (Dutch)
  • 1697, Samuel Reyher (German)
  • 1702, Hendrik Coets (Dutch)
  • 1714, Chr. Schessler (German)
  • 1720s, Jagannatha Samrat (Sanskrit, based on the Arabic translation of Nasir al-Din al-Tusi)[40]
  • 1731, Guido Grandi (abbreviation to Italian)
  • 1738, Ivan Satarov (Russian from French)
  • 1744, Mårten Strömer (Swedish)
  • 1749, Dechales (Italian)
  • 1749, Methodios Anthrakitis (Μεθόδιος Ανθρακίτης) (Greek)
  • 1745, Ernest Gottlieb Ziegenbalg (Danish)
  • 1752, Leonardo Ximenes (Italian)
  • 1763, Pibo Steenstra (Dutch)
  • 1768, Angelo Brunelli (Portuguese)
  • 1773, 1781, J. F. Lorenz (German)
  • 1780, Baruch Schick of Shklov (Hebrew)[41]
  • 1789, Pr. Suvoroff nad Yos. Nikitin (Russian from Greek)
  • 1803, H.C. Linderup (Danish)
  • 1804, François Peyrard (French). Peyrard discovered in 1808 the Vaticanus Graecus 190, which enables him to provide a first definitive version in 1814–1818
  • 1807, Józef Czech (Polish based on Greek, Latin and English editions)
  • 1807, J. K. F. Hauff (German)
  • 1818, Vincenzo Flauti (Italian)
  • 1820, Benjamin of Lesbos (Modern Greek)
  • 1828, Joh. Josh and Ign. Hoffmann (German)
  • 1833, E. S. Unger (German)
  • 1836, H. Falk (Swedish)
  • 1844, 1845, 1859, P. R. Bråkenhjelm (Swedish)
  • 1850, F. A. A. Lundgren (Swedish)
  • 1850, H. A. Witt and M. E. Areskong (Swedish)
  • 1865, Sámuel Brassai (Hungarian)
  • 1873, Masakuni Yamada (Japanese)
  • 1880, Vachtchenko-Zakhartchenko (Russian)
  • 1897, Thyra Eibe (Danish)
  • 1901, Max Simon (German)
  • 1907, František Servít (Czech)[42]
  • 1953, 1958, 1975, Evangelos Stamatis (Ευάγγελος Σταμάτης) (Modern Greek)
  • 1999, Maja Hudoletnjak Grgić (Book I-VI) (Croatian)[43]
  • 2009, Irineu Bicudo (Portuguese)
  • 2019, Ali Sinan Sertöz (Turkish)[44]
  • 2022, Ján Čižmár (Slovak)

Book I Editions

  • 1886, Euclid Book I Hall & Stevens (English)
  • 1891,1896, The Harpur Euclid by Edward Langley and Seys Phillips (English)
  • 1949, Henry Regnery Company (English)

Selected editions currently in print

  • Euclid's Elements – All thirteen books complete in one volume, Based on Heath's translation, edited by Dana Densmore, et al. Green Lion Press ISBN 1-888009-18-7.
  • The Elements: Books I–XIII – Complete and Unabridged (2006), Translated by Sir Thomas Heath, Barnes & Noble ISBN 0-7607-6312-7.
  • The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, translation and commentaries by Heath, Thomas L. (1956) in three volumes. Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-60088-2 (vol. 1), ISBN 0-486-60089-0 (vol. 2), ISBN 0-486-60090-4 (vol. 3)
  • Plane Geometry (Euclid's elements Redux) Books I–VI, based on John Casey's translation, edited by Daniel Callahan, ISBN 978-1977730039

Selected editions based on Oliver Byrne's edition


Free versions

  • Euclid's Elements Redux, Volume 1, contains books I–III, based on John Casey's translation.[45]
  • Euclid's Elements Redux, Volume 2, contains books IV–VIII, based on John Casey's translation.[45]

See also





  1. ^ Wilson 2006, p. 278 states, "Euclid's Elements subsequently became the basis of all mathematical education, not only in the Roman and Byzantine periods, but right down to the mid-20th century, and it could be argued that it is the most successful textbook ever written."
  2. ^ Boyer 1991, p. 100 notes, "As teachers at the school he called a band of leading scholars, among whom was the author of the most fabulously successful mathematics textbook ever written – the Elements (Stoichia) of Euclid".
  3. ^ Boyer 1991, p. 119 notes, "The Elements of Euclid not only was the earliest major Greek mathematical work to come down to us, but also the most influential textbook of all times. [...]The first printed versions of the Elements appeared at Venice in 1482, one of the very earliest of mathematical books to be set in type; it has been estimated that since then at least a thousand editions have been published. Perhaps no book other than the Bible can boast so many editions, and certainly no mathematical work has had an influence comparable with that of Euclid's Elements".
  4. ^ Bunt, Jones & Bedient 1988, p. 142 state, "the Elements became known to Western Europe via the Arabs and the Moors. There, the Elements became the foundation of mathematical education. More than 1000 editions of the Elements are known. In all probability, it is, next to the Bible, the most widely spread book in the civilization of the Western world."
  5. ^ One older work claims Adelard disguised himself as a Muslim student to obtain a copy in Muslim Córdoba.[10] However, more recent biographical work has turned up no clear documentation that Adelard ever went to Muslim-ruled Spain, although he spent time in Norman-ruled Sicily and Crusader-ruled Antioch, both of which had Arabic-speaking populations. Charles Burnett, Adelard of Bath: Conversations with his Nephew (Cambridge, 1999); Charles Burnett, Adelard of Bath (University of London, 1987).
  6. ^ Boyer 1991, pp. 118–119 writes, "In ancient times it was not uncommon to attribute to a celebrated author works that were not by him; thus, some versions of Euclid's Elements include a fourteenth and even a fifteenth book, both shown by later scholars to be apocryphal. The so-called Book XIV continues Euclid's comparison of the regular solids inscribed in a sphere, the chief results being that the ratio of the surfaces of the dodecahedron and icosahedron inscribed in the same sphere is the same as the ratio of their volumes, the ratio being that of the edge of the cube to the edge of the icosahedron, that is,  . It is thought that this book may have been composed by Hypsicles on the basis of a treatise (now lost) by Apollonius comparing the dodecahedron and icosahedron. [...] The spurious Book XV, which is inferior, is thought to have been (at least in part) the work of Isidore of Miletus (fl. ca. A.D. 532), architect of the cathedral of Holy Wisdom (Hagia Sophia) at Constantinople. This book also deals with the regular solids, counting the number of edges and solid angles in the solids, and finding the measures of the dihedral angles of faces meeting at an edge.


  1. ^ Boyer 1991, p. 100.
  2. ^ a b c Russell 2013, p. 177.
  3. ^ Van der Waerden 1975, p. 197.
  4. ^ a b Ball 1915, p. 54.
  5. ^ Ball 1915, p. 38.
  6. ^ Unguru, S. (1985). Digging for Structure into the Elements: Euclid, Hilbert, and Mueller. Historia Mathematica 12, 176
  7. ^ Zhmud, L. (1998). Plato as "Architect of Science". Phonesis 43, 211
  8. ^ The Earliest Surviving Manuscript Closest to Euclid's Original Text (Circa 850); an image Archived 2009-12-20 at the Wayback Machine of one page
  9. ^ Reynolds & Wilson 1991, p. 57.
  10. ^ Ball 1915, p. 165.
  11. ^ Murdoch, John E. (1967). "Euclides Graeco-Latinus: A Hitherto Unknown Medieval Latin Translation of the Elements Made Directly from the Greek". Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 71: 249–302. doi:10.2307/310767. JSTOR 310767.
  12. ^ Knorr, Wilbur R. (1990). "John of Tynemouth alias John of London: Emerging Portrait of a Singular Medieval Mathematician". The British Journal for the History of Science. 23 (3): 293–330. doi:10.1017/S0007087400044009. ISSN 0007-0874. JSTOR 4026757. S2CID 144172844.
  13. ^ Busard 2005.
  14. ^ Menso, Folkerts (1989). Euclid in Medieval Europe (PDF). Benjamin catalogue.
  15. ^ Campanus``, "DigiVatLib". Retrieved 20 November 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  16. ^ Busard 2005, p. 1.
  17. ^ "Mathematical Treasures - Greek Edition of Euclid's Elements | Mathematical Association of America".
  18. ^ Thomas, Heath (1956). The thirteen books of Euclid's Elements. Vol. 1: Introduction and books I, II (Second revised with additions ed.). New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-60088-8.
  19. ^ Andrew., Liptak (2 September 2017). "One of the world's most influential math texts is getting a beautiful, minimalist edition". The Verge.
  20. ^ Grabiner., Judith. "How Euclid once ruled the world". Plus Magazine.
  21. ^ Ketcham 1901.
  22. ^ Euclid as Founding Father
  23. ^ Herschbach, Dudley. "Einstein as a Student" (PDF). Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. p. 3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-02-26.: about Max Talmud visited on Thursdays for six years.
  24. ^ Prindle, Joseph. "Albert Einstein – Young Einstein". Archived from the original on 10 June 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  25. ^ Joyce, D. E. (June 1997), "Book X, Proposition XXIX", Euclid's Elements, Clark University
  26. ^ a b Hartshorne 2000, p. 18.
  27. ^ Hartshorne 2000, pp. 18–20.
  28. ^ a b Ball 1915, p. 55.
  29. ^ Ball 1915, pp. 54, 58, 127.
  30. ^ Heath 1963, p. 216.
  31. ^ Toussaint 1993, pp. 12–23.
  32. ^ Heath 1956a, p. 62.
  33. ^ Heath 1956a, p. 242.
  34. ^ Heath 1956a, p. 249.
  35. ^ Boyer 1991, pp. 118–119.
  36. ^ Alexanderson & Greenwalt 2012, p. 163
  37. ^ "Editio Princeps of Euclid's Elements, the Most Famous Textbook Ever Published : History of Information". Retrieved 2023-07-28.
  38. ^ "The First Printed Edition of the Greek Text of Euclid is also the First Edition to Include the Diagrams within the Text : History of Information". Retrieved 2023-07-28.
  39. ^ Nasir al-Din al-Tusi 1594.
  40. ^ Sarma 1997, pp. 460–461.
  41. ^ "JNUL Digitized Book Repository". 22 June 2009. Archived from the original on 22 June 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  42. ^ Servít 1907.
  43. ^ Euklid 1999.
  44. ^ Sertöz 2019.
  45. ^ a b Callahan & Casey 2015.