Draft talk:Israel Elwyn
Alert on promotionalism
editI removed, twice, images that are promotional in nature, showing people in totally non specific settings that do not help understand the work of the organization. I left one, but I am in doubt about that also, but in general a WP article is considered better if it does have an illustration.
I am not goingto work furter on this in draft space, because I think it is, and will remain, too promotional for an encyclopedia . If it is accepted, which I continue to think it sould not be in its present state, , I will remove the promotionalism DGG ( talk ) 06:54, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with the claims. There are 33 references in this article, and it describes an actual and existing association. I was not impressed that this article is more commercial than other articles on Wikipedia about other companies or organisations. The information here is encyclopedic and relevant. Therefore I disagree with the claim that this is an advertising or commercial article. Regards, Danny Danny-w (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)