Open main menu

Wikipedia β

Congregationalism in the United States

North Church is an historic Congregational church in Portsmouth, New Hampshire. The current building dates to 1854.

Congregationalism in the United States consists of Protestant churches in the Reformed tradition distinguished by having a congregational form of church government and which trace their origins mainly to Puritan settlers of colonial New England. Congregational churches in other parts of the world are often related to these in the United States due to American missionary activities.

Congregational churches have had an important impact on the religious, political and cultural history of the United States. Congregational practices concerning church governance influenced the early development of democratic institutions in New England, and many of the nation's oldest educational institutions, such as Harvard and Yale University, were founded to train Congregational clergy. Congregational churches and ministers influenced the First and Second Great Awakenings and were early promoters of the missionary movement of the 19th century. The Congregational tradition has shaped both Mainline Protestantism and Evangelicalism in the United States.

In the 20th century, the Congregational tradition in America fragmented into three different denominations. The largest of these is the United Church of Christ, which resulted from a 1957 merger with the Evangelical and Reformed Church. Congregationalists who chose not to join the United Church of Christ founded two alternative denominations: the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches and the Conservative Congregational Christian Conference.

Contents

HistoryEdit

Early settlement of New England (1630–1640)Edit

The Congregational tradition was brought to America in the 1630s by the Puritans—a Calvinistic group within the Church of England that desired to purify it of any remaining teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic Church.[1] As part of their reforms, Puritans desired to replace the Church of England's episcopal polity (rule by bishops) with another form of church government. Some English Puritans favored presbyterian polity (rule by assemblies of presbyters), as was utilized by the Church of Scotland, but those who founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony organized their churches according to congregational polity (rule by members of the local church).[2]

Developing the New England WayEdit

 
Portrait of John Cotton by John Smibert.

According to historian James F. Cooper Jr., Congregationalism helped imbue the political culture of Massachusetts with several important concepts: "adherence to fundamental or 'higher' laws, strict limitations upon all human authority, free consent, local self-government, and, especially, extensive lay participation."[3] However, congregational polity also meant the absence of any centralized church authority. The result was that at times the first generation of Congregationalists struggled to agree on common beliefs and practices. For example, specific rules on church membership and baptism requirements were still being debated into the late 1630s.[3]

To help achieve unity, Puritan clergy would often meet in conferences to discuss issues arising within the churches and to offer advice. Congregationalists also looked to the ministers of the First Church in Boston to set examples for other churches to follow. One of the most prominent of these ministers was John Cotton, considered by historians to be the "father of New England Congregationalism", who through his preaching helped to standardize Congregational practices. Because of these efforts at promoting unity, standardization of practices related to baptism, church discipline, and election of church officers was largely achieved by 1635.[4]

Within the first decade, the colonists developed a system in which each community organized a gathered church of believers (i.e. only those who were thought to be among the elect and could give an account of a conversion experience were admitted as members).[5] Every congregation was founded upon a church covenant, a written agreement signed by all members in which they agreed to uphold congregational principles, to be guided by sola scriptura in their decision making, and to submit to church discipline. The right of each congregation to elect its own officers and manage its own affairs was upheld.[6][7]

For church offices, Congregationalists imitated the model developed in Calvinist Geneva. There were two major offices: elder (or presbyter) and deacon. There were two types of elders. Ministers, whose responsibilities included preaching and administering the sacraments, were referred to as teaching elders. Prominent laymen would be elected as ruling elders. Ruling elders governed the church alongside teaching elders, and, while they could not administer the sacraments, they could preach. Ruling elders were chosen for life. The duties of deacons largely revolved around financial matters. Other than elders and deacons, congregations also elected messengers to represent them in synods (church councils) for the purpose of offering non-binding advisory opinions.[8]

The Puritans had created a society in which Congregationalism was the state church, its ministers were supported by tax payers, and only full church members could vote in elections.[9] To ensure that the colony had a supply of educated ministers, Harvard University was founded in 1636.[10] By 1640, 18 churches had been gathered in Massachusetts.[11] In addition, Puritans established the Connecticut Colony in 1636 and New Haven Colony in 1637.[12] Eventually, there were 33 Congregational churches in New England.[13]

Antinomian ControversyEdit

 
Anne Hutchinson on Trial (1901) by Edwin Austin Abbey

The major conflict during the settlement period was the Antinomian Controversy of 1636–1638. In 1635, Anne Hutchinson began holding meetings in her home to summarize the previous week's sermons for women who had been absent. Soon dozens of women and men were attending her meetings, including the colony's governor, Henry Vane. Such gatherings were not unusual. Hutchinson, however, became critical of ministers who taught preparationism, the idea that a person could prepare for salvation by attending church, reading the Bible, and living a moral life. Preparationist ministers did not teach that such actions merited salvation, only that they helped a sinner to prepare for receiving God's grace.[14] In contrast to the free grace theology of John Cotton, who she greatly admired, Hutchinson accused preparationist ministers of legalism and preaching a "covenant of works" rather than a "covenant of grace".[15]

By the fall of 1636, Hutchinson's support in Boston was growing. Eventually, she won over nearly the entire Boston congregation, which nearly censured its own pastor, John Wilson, for opposing the free grace position. Hutchinson also had the apparent support of Cotton and Boston's two ruling elders.[16] Outside of Boston, the elders of Massachusetts and the Connecticut and New Haven colonies unanimously rejected Hutchinson's teachings as Antinomianism. They finally prevailed upon Cotton to speak out against the errors of the Antinomians at a synod in September 1637. A civil trial was held in November in which Hutchinson was sentenced to banishment, and a church trial followed in March 1638 in which the Boston congregation switched sides and unanimously voted for Hutchinson's excommunication. This effectively ended the controversy.[17]

In the aftermath of the crisis, ministers realized the need for greater communication between churches and standardization of preaching. As a consequence, nonbinding ministerial conferences to discuss theological questions and address conflicts became more frequent in the following years.[18] A more substantial innovation was the implementation of the "third way of communion", a method of isolating a dissident or heretical church from neighboring churches. Members of an offending church would be unable to worship or receive the Lord's Supper in other churches.[19]

Defining Congregationalism (1640s)Edit

In the 1640s, Congregationalists were under pressure to craft a formal statement of congregational church discipline. This was partly motivated by the need to reassure English Puritans about congregational government. It was feared that the English Parliament might intervene in New England's churches due to dissatisfaction with their admission policies.[20] It was also thought necessary to combat the threat of Presbyterianism at home. Conflict erupted in the churches at Newbury and Hingham when their pastors began introducing presbyterian governance.[21]

The Massachusetts General Court called for a synod to meet in Cambridge to craft such a statement. The Cambridge Platform was completed by the synod in 1648 and commended by the General Court as an accurate description of Congregational practice after the churches were given time to study the document, provide feedback, and finally ratify it. While the Platform was legally nonbinding and intended only to be descriptive, it soon became regarded by ministers and lay people alike as the religious constitution of Massachusetts, guaranteeing the rights of church officers and members.[22]

Missionary efforts among the Native Americans began in the 1640s. John Eliot began missionary work among the natives in 1646 and later published the Eliot Indian Bible, a Massachusett language translation. The Mayhew family began their work among the natives of Martha's Vineyard around the same time as Eliot. These missionary efforts suffered serious setbacks as a result of King Philip's War.[23]

Puritan declension (1650–1691)Edit

 
Thomas Shepard

In the years after the Antinomian Controversy, Congregationalists struggled with the problem of decreasing conversions among second-generation settlers. These unconverted adults had been baptized as infants and most of them studied the Bible, attended church and raised their children as Christians. Nevertheless, they were barred from receiving the Lord's Supper, voting or holding office, and from having their children (the grandchildren of church members) baptized. As the number of unconverted adults grew, church leaders began to think of alternative ways of tying people to the church without abandoning the idea that the church should be one of believers.[24]

As early as 1648, some ministers proposed what would later become known as the Half-Way Covenant. This would allow the grandchildren of church members to be baptized as long as their parents accepted their congregation's covenant and lived Christian lives. Richard Mather and Thomas Shepard were early supporters of the change. In 1657, a meeting of ministers at Boston formally endorsed the Half-Way Covenant. In 1662, a synod of lay and clerical representatives also endorsed the Half-Way Covenant.[25]

Nevertheless, the decision to accept or reject the Half-Way Covenant belonged to each congregation. Some churches maintained the original standard into the 1700s. Other churches went beyond the Half-Way Covenant, opening baptism to all infants whether or not their parents or grandparents had been baptized. Other churches, citing the belief that baptism and the Lord's Supper were "converting ordinances" capable of helping the unconverted achieve salvation, allowed the unconverted to receive the Lord's Supper as well.[26]

The decline of conversions and the division over the Half-Way Covenant were part of a larger loss of confidence experienced by Puritans in the latter half of the 17th century. In the 1660s and 1670s, Puritans began noting signs of moral decline in New England, and ministers began preaching jeremiads calling people to account for their sins. The most popular jeremiad, Michael Wigglesworth's "The Day of Doom", became the first best seller in America.[27]

In 1684, Massachusetts' colonial charter was revoked. It was merged with the other Bible Commonwealths along with New York and New Jersey into the Dominion of New England. Edmund Andros, an Anglican, was appointed royal governor and demanded that Anglicans be allowed to worship freely in Boston. The Dominion collapsed after the Glorious Revolution of 1688–89, and a new charter was granted in 1691. However, the power of the Congregational churches remained diminished. The governor continued to be appointed by the crown, and voting rights were now based on wealth rather than church membership.[28]

Development of consociationalism (1690–1708)Edit

 
Campus of Harvard University, ca. 1821-1823

In the 18th century, Congregational ministers began forming clerical associations for fellowship and consultation.[29] The first association was the Cambridge Association formed in 1690 for ministers in and around Boston. It met in Cambridge on the grounds of Harvard. Its purpose was to "debate any matter referring to ourselves" and "to hear and consider any cases that shall be proposed unto us, from churches or private persons". By 1692, two other associations had been formed, and the number had increased to five by 1705.[30]

In the 1690s, John Leverett the Younger, William Brattle (pastor of First Parish in Cambridge), Thomas Brattle, and Ebenezer Pemberton (pastor of Old South Church) proposed a number of changes in Congregational practice. These changes included abandoning the consideration of conversion narratives in granting church membership and allowing all baptized members of a community (whether full members or not) to vote in elections for ministers. They also supported the baptism of all children presented by any Christian sponsor and the liturgical use of the Lord's Prayer.[31]

These changes were strongly opposed by Increase Mather, president of Harvard. The result was that Thomas Brattle and his associates built a new church in Boston in 1698. They invited Benjamin Colman, then in England, to become the pastor. Coleman was ordained by Presbyterians in England before leaving for America because it was assumed that the conservative churches of Boston would have opposed his ordination in New England. After arriving in November 1699, his manner of ordination was controversial given that it had not been done by the congregation he was to serve, as was Congregational practice. Brattle Street Church was organized on December 12, 1699, but without the support of the other churches in the colony. Despite the opposition of Mather and other conservatives, however, the church gained recognition and in time it became indistinguishable from other Congregational churches.[32] By the 1730s, Colman was the leading evangelical pastor in Boston.[33]

Ultimately, the formation of Brattle Street Church spurred Congregationalists to modify their polity and strengthen the role of associations in order to promote greater uniformity. Representatives from the Massachusetts ministerial associations met in Boston in September 1705. They proposed a plan with two major features. The first was that associations examine and license ministerial candidates, investigate charges of ministerial misconduct, and annually elect delegates to a colony-wide general association. The second feature was the creation of "standing councils" of ministers and lay representatives to supervise the churches within a geographical area and to act as counterparts to the ministerial associations. The decisions of these councils were to be "final and decisive" but could be referred to a neighboring standing council for further review. If a church refused to adhere to a council's ruling, the neighboring churches would withdraw communion from the offending church. In Massachusetts, the proposals encountered much opposition as they were viewed as being inconsistent with congregational polity. The creation of standing councils was never acted on, but Massachusetts associations did adopt a system of ministerial licensure.[34]

While largely rejected in Massachusetts, the proposals of 1705 received a more favorable reception in Connecticut. In September 1708, a synod met at the request of the Connecticut General Assembly to write a new platform of church government. The Saybrook Platform called for the creation of standing councils called consociations in every county and tasked associations with providing ministerial consultation and licensure. The platform was approved by the General Assembly and associations and consociations were formed in every county. The General Association of Connecticut was formed as a colony-wide organization of ministers and met for the first time in May 1709. The Saybrook Platform was legally recognized until 1784 and continued to govern the majority of Connecticut churches until the middle of the 19th century.[35]

Yale University was established by the Congregational clergy of Connecticut in 1701.[36]

Great Awakening (1735–1744)Edit

 
Old South Meeting House, one of the churches where George Whitefield preached while in Boston in 1740.[37]

By 1740, there were 423 Congregational churches in colonial America—33.7 percent of all churches.[38] Nevertheless, at the start of the 18th century, many believed that New England had become a morally degenerate society more focused on worldly gain than on religious piety. Church historian Williston Walker described New England piety of the time as "low and unemotional."[39] To spiritually awaken their congregations and rescue the original Puritan mission of creating a godly society, Congregational ministers promoted revivalism, the attempt to bring spiritual renewal to an entire community.[29] The first two decades of the 18th century saw local revivals occur that resulted in large numbers of converts. These revivals sometimes resulted from natural disasters that were interpreted as divine judgment.[40] For example, revival followed after the earthquake of October 29, 1727.[41]

In 1735, Jonathan Edwards led his First Church congregation of Northampton, Massachusetts, through a religious revival. His Narrative of Surprising Conversions, describing the conversion experiences that occurred in the revival, was widely read throughout New England and raised hopes among Congregationalists of a general revival of religion.[40]

These hopes were seemingly fulfilled with the start of the Great Awakening, which was initiated by the preaching of George Whitefield, an Anglican priest who had preached revivalistic sermons to large audiences in England. He arrived at Boston in September 1740, preaching first at Brattle Street Church, and then visited other parts of New England. Though only in New England for a few weeks, the revival spread to every part of the region in the two years following his brief tour. Whitefield was followed by itinerant preacher and Presbyterian minister Gilbert Tennent and dozens of other itinerants.[42]

Initially, the Awakening's strongest supporters came from Congregational ministers, who had already been working to foster revivals in their parishes. Itinerants and local pastors worked together to produce and nourish revivals, and often local pastors would cooperate together to lead revivals in neighboring parishes. The most famous sermon preached during the Great Awakening, for example, was "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" delivered by Edwards at Enfield, Connecticut, in July 1741. Many in the congregation were affected by Edwards's sermon with minister Stephen Williams reporting "amazing shrieks and cries" caused by the heightened religious excitement.[43]

 
Portrait of Jonathan Edwards, revivalist and theologian

By 1742, the revival had entered a more radical and disruptive phase. Lay people became more active participants in the services by crying out, exhorting, or having visions. Uneducated men and women began to preach without formal training, and some itinerant preachers were active in parishes without the approval of the local pastor. Enthusiasts even claimed that many of the clergy were unconverted themselves and thus unqualified to be ministers.[44] Congregationalists split into Old Lights and New Lights over the Awakening, with Old Lights opposing it and New Lights supporting it.[45]

A notable example of revival radicalism was James Davenport, a Congregational minister who preached to large crowds throughout Massachusetts and Connecticut. Davenport denounced ministers who opposed him as being "unconverted" and "leading their people blindfold to hell." In March 1743, he held a book burning of the works of Increase Mather, William Beveridge, John Flavel and others.[46]

Concerns over the revival led the Connecticut General Assembly to call a synod in 1741, which was the last Congregational synod convened under state authority. This "General Consociation" consisted of both lay and clerical representatives from all of the consociations in the colony. It ruled that itinerant ministers should preach in no parish except with the permission of the local pastor. In May 1742, the General Assembly passed legislation requiring ministers to receive permission to preach from the local pastor; violation of the law would result in the loss of a minister's state-provided salary.[47]

In 1743, the annual Massachusetts Ministerial Convention condemned "the disorderly tumults and indecent behaviors" that occurred in many revival meetings. Charles Chauncy of Boston's First Church became the leader of the revival's opponents with the publication of his Seasonable Thoughts on the State of Religion in New England, which attacked the enthusiasm and extravagant behaviors of revival meetings.[37]

Other Congregationalists met at Boston in 1743 under the leadership of Benjamin Colman of Brattle Street Church and Thomas Prince of Old South Church. They issued a resolution supporting the revival as the work of God and downplaying the impact of "irregularities" that had occurred.[37] Nevertheless, the atmosphere toward revival had changed by 1744 when Whitefield returned to New England. The faculties of Harvard and Yale issued statements critical of his methods, and ministerial associations throughout the region spoke against allowing him to preach in their churches.[48]

Old and New LightsEdit

The Great Awakening further aggravated theological divisions that had already existed, mainly over conservative and liberal positions on admitting the unconverted to the Lord's Supper and full church membership.[49] Supporters of the Great Awakening and revivalism in general were known as New Lights, while those who opposed the revival were known as Old Lights. Historian William Youngs has observed that these "terms are confusing because in doctrine both groups embraced traditional Calvinistic ideas, and both accepted eighteenth-century innovations."[50] Within these two parties existed various subgroups.[51]

 
Charles Chauncy was an influential liberal theologian and opponent of New Light revivalism.

A subset of the Old Lights was the liberal party, which not only opposed revivalism but many traditional Calvinist beliefs as well.[51] Accused by conservatives of having drifted into Arminianism, liberals such as Experience Mayhew, Lemuel Briant and Samuel Webster rejected the doctrines of original sin and total depravity and held that good works and virtuous living could lead to salvation.[52] As a reaction to the emotional religion of the Great Awakening, the liberals embraced Enlightenment rationalism, which can be seen in their rejection of traditional doctrines. Charles Chauncy, for example, questioned the existence of an eternal hell and mounted a biblical defense of universal salvation. Jonathan Mayhew of Boston's West Church rejected traditional views on the divinity of Christ and embraced Arianism. In the 19th century, the liberals would evolve into the Unitarians.[53]

Most Old Lights, however, were not liberals but defenders of what they considered traditional Reformed theology. In time, they became known as the "Old Calvinists". While they rejected the excessive emotionalism of the revivalists, they did believe in the necessity of conversion. For them, conversion was a gradual process aided by the means of grace (preaching, catechizing, prayer) and pastoral care.[54]

While most New Lights stayed within the established Congregational churches, there were still those in New England who embraced the radical wing of the Awakening–with its trances, visions, and shouting. When radical revivalists could not control their local churches, they separated from the state churches and formed new congregations. These Separate or Strict Congregationalists were often poor. They rejected the necessity of an educated ministry, ministerial associations (which had tried to control the revival), and the Half-Way Covenant. Prone to schisms and forced to pay taxes for the state churches, Separate Congregatonalists did not survive long.[48] The more traditional ones returned to the established Congregational churches, while the most radical embraced adult baptism and became Baptists. Shubal Stearns, a Separate Congregationalist missionary to the South, became the founding father of the Separate Baptists.[55]

Post-Awakening and Revolutionary era (1745–1783)Edit

In the two decades after the First Great Awakening, the tone of Congregational thought was set by New Light theologian Jonathan Edwards and his followers, most notable being Joseph Bellamy and Samuel Hopkins. The New Divinity, as the Edwardsean school of thought became known, sought to answer Arminian objections to Calvinism and to provide a theological basis for the revivalism that had been unleashed by the Great Awakening. Though the New Divinity would remain the dominant theological orientation into the 19th century, there were voices that still advocated for liberalism and Old Calvinism as well.[56]

During the American Revolution, most Congregational ministers sided with the Patriots and American independence. This was largely because ministers chose to stand with their congregations who felt the British government was becoming tyrannical. Ministers were also motivated by fear that the British would appoint Anglican bishops for the American colonies. This had been proposed as a practical measure; American bishops could ordain Anglican priests in the colonies without requiring candidates for ordination to travel to England. Congregationalists, however, remembered how their Puritan ancestors were oppressed by bishops in England and had no desire to see the same system in America.[57]

Ministers preached patriotic sermons on Sundays and during militia musters. Jonathan Mayhew, for example, preached an early revolutionary sermon on The Danger of Unlimited Submission. Many went to war as chaplains, and some actually bore arms in times of extreme danger. Because of their overwhelming support for independence, Congregational ministers were called the "Black Regiment" or "Black-Robed Regiment" by the British.[57]

Voluntary societies and interdenominational cooperation (1762–1852)Edit

Domestic societiesEdit

 
The Congregational Church of Austinburg, organized in 1801, is the second oldest Congregational church in Ohio and the oldest in the Western Reserve. The current building dates to 1877.[58]

By 1776, there were 668 Congregational churches—21 percent of all churches in America.[38] Congregationalism had been a tradition largely confined to New England, but Congregationalists would migrate westward as the new United States expanded. Vermont was the first of these new territories to be opened up. The first church was established in 1762, but there were 74 Congregational churches in Vermont by 1800. Those churches organized a General Convention for that state in 1796. The University of Vermont and Middlebury College were founded by Congregationalists.[59]

Congregational churches had been present in eastern New York prior to the Revolution, but expansion into the central and western parts of that state took place in the 1790s as emigration increased from Massachusetts and Connecticut. As New Englanders settled in the Old Northwest, they brought Congregationalism with them. The First Congregational Church of Marietta, Ohio, gathered in 1796, is the oldest Congregational church in the region.[60]

In 1798, the Connecticut General Association created the Connecticut Missionary Society to provide for the religious needs of the new settlements. Between 1798 and 1818, the society sent 148 ministers to the frontier settlements of northern New England, Pennsylvania and the Old Northwest. Initially, the society recruited settled pastors to undertake four-month tours in the new settlements. When this approach proved unworkable, the society shed its opposition to itinerant ministry and began ordaining young men to serve as full-time evangelists. These operated similarly to the Methodist circuit riders, "moving from town to town, preaching revival sermons, catechizing youth, administering the sacraments, and distributing religious literature." The society distributed tracts, hymnals, sermon collections and theological treatises for use in religious worship and education. Reflecting the ideology of its leaders, the society's literature heavily favored the writings of Jonathan Edwards and the New Divinity. Its most widely circulated publication was the Connecticut Evangelical Magazine, which provided coverage of revivals and missions around the world and which was read as far south as Georgia.[61]

In 1799, the Massachusetts Missionary Society was established under the leadership of Nathanael Emmons. Like its Connecticut counterpart, it was dominated by Edwardseans and published its own periodical, the Massachusetts Missionary Magazine. The New Hampshire Missionary Society was organized in 1801, and the Vermont General Convention organized its own missionary society in 1807.[62]

Besides those dedicated to missions, Congregationalists created voluntary societies for encouraging education, Bible reading and moral reform. Some of these became national organizations, such as the American Education Society in 1815 (which provided financial aid for seminary students), the American Bible Society in 1816, the American Colonization Society in 1817, and the American Temperance Society in 1826. Some of these were joint projects with Presbyterians.[63]

Foreign missionsEdit

 
Kawaiahaʻo Church, known as the "Westminster Abbey of Hawaii"

Following the example of the churches in Connecticut and Vermont, Congregationalists in other parts of the Northeast formed statewide associations. The Massachusetts General Association was founded in 1803 by the Old Calvinists and Edwardseans of that state.[64] In 1808, the churches in Rhode Island organized the Evangelical Consociation of Rhode Island. The New Hampshire General Association was established in 1809. The General Conference of Maine was founded sometime in the 1820s, and the New York General Association was formed in 1834.[65]

In 1810, a group of Andover students led by Samuel John Mills and Adoniram Judson convinced the Massachusetts General Association to support the creation of a foreign missionary society. The Connecticut General Association was invited to participate as well and hosted the first meeting of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. Through the American Board, Congregational churches supported missionaries in India, Ceylon, South Africa, Turkey and the Hawaiian Islands.[66]

The American Board also established missions among Native American tribes, including the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Tetons, Blackfeet, and Winnebagos. As a plaintiff in Worcester v. Georgia, American Board missionary Samuel Worcester fought to prevent the forced relocation of the Cherokees, and the United States Supreme Court ruled in his favor. When President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the decision, the Cherokee were sent to Oklahoma, and American Board missionaries followed them there.[67]

Union with PresbyteriansEdit

 
Revivalist and social reformer Lyman Beecher served both Congregational and Presbyterian churches during his ministry.

The challenge of building churches and providing ministers for western settlements motivated many Congregationalists to engage in closer cooperation with the Presbyterians. While the two denominations had different systems of church government, they were both part of the Calvinist tradition. This shared heritage and the necessity of evangelizing the west led them to form united Presbyterian-Congregational institutions and churches in areas where ministers and resources were in short supply. This cooperation was formalized in the Plan of Union, first adopted in 1801 between the Presbyterian Church in the United States of America and the General Association of Connecticut.[68] The plan was later adopted by the Vermont General Convention, the New Hampshire General Association and the Massachusetts General Association.[69]

The plan allowed for churches to hire pastors from either denomination and the creation of mixed churches that could belong to either a Congregational association or a local presbytery of the Presbyterian Church. Church discipline, however, was to be administered by a committee with members from both denominations. When disputes arose, churches could appeal to councils representing both Congregationalists and Presbyterians. Union colleges were also created, such as Knox College in Illinois, which continues its dual affiliation with the United Church of Christ and the Presbyterian Church (USA).[70]

The Presbyterians gained more from the union than the Congregationalists. Around 2000 churches founded as Congregationalist in the states of New York, Ohio, Illinois and Michigan switched allegiance to the Presbyterian Church. The union was also damaged by conflict between conservatives and liberals in both denominations. A major blow to the plan occurred in 1837 when the Presbyterian Church split as a result of the Old School–New School Controversy. The Old School Presbyterians withdrew from the union, but the New School Presbyterians remained. The union was further damaged by tensions over slavery. In 1852, a national convention of Congregational churches met in Albany, New York, and ended the Plan of Union.[71]

Unitarian controversy and disestablishment (1804–1833)Edit

Evangelicals and Unitarians dividedEdit

 
Park Street Church in Boston, c. 1890

Since the 17th century, Congregationalists had managed to maintain unity despite disagreements over the role of man and God in salvation and the adoption by liberals of nontrinitarian theological ideas.[72] By the start of the 19th century, however, there was less willingness to tolerate theological liberalism. The Second Great Awakening had initiated a new wave of revivalism and a more aggressive stance from conservatives. Old Calvinists and Edwardseans, while not ignoring their own differences, agreed that they needed to work together to defend the "evangelical truth" from liberalism.[73] The "orthodox" or evangelicals, as they came to be known, were united around the omnipotence of God, the necessity of conversion, a converted church membership, and the literal truth of the Bible. They were actively involved in evangelism and expansion through voluntary societies.[74]

By the 19th century, the liberals had evolved into Unitarians. Not only did they deny the doctrine of the Trinity as unscriptural, they believed the Bible should be interpreted rationally, not in a literal manner. Their preaching focused on ethics rather than on doctrine and did not limit church membership to the converted. Unitarians did not participate in evangelistic societies due to their conviction that people informed by reason and scripture should be free to believe what they wanted. When they did organize, they tended to focus on education and philanthropic causes.[74]

The Unitarian controversy was initiated when conservatives, led by Yale-educated geographer and Boston-area minister Jedidiah Morse, opposed the appointment of liberal Henry Ware to the Hollis Chair of Divinity at Harvard University in 1805. While unsuccessful, Morse was able to form a network of conservative ministers from the Boston area, mainly outside the city itself as Boston's churches were overwhelmingly liberal. Conservatives began closing their pulpits to liberal ministers, and Park Street Church was established in 1809 to provide Boston with an evangelical church. In the years after the Ware controversy, Harvard became increasingly partisan, supporting only the liberal party.[75] In 1808, Edwardseans and Old Calvinists joined forces and established Andover Theological Seminary as an alternative to liberal Harvard. Andover was the first Protestant seminary in North America.[76]

 
Allin Congregational Church, built in 1819, lost the Dedham case.

In 1815, Morse published Review of American Unitarianism, which accused Unitarians of infidelity and heresy. William Ellery Channing, pastor of Boston's Federal Street Church, responded by accusing conservatives of instigating theological controversy.[77] In 1819, Channing went on to deliver an important sermon in defense of liberal religion titled "Unitarian Christianity". The split was complete by 1825 when the liberals established the American Unitarian Association, thereby acknowledging a separate denominational identity.[72]

DisestablishmentEdit

At the start of the 19th century, Congregationalism remained the established church of Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. This meant that Congregational churches were financially supported through taxation. In 1818, however, Connecticut's new state constitution required disestablishment. New Hampshire followed a year later with passage of the Toleration Act, which stripped Congregational churches of their special status.[78]

Massachusetts was slower to end state support of Congregationalism, but disestablishment was made more likely after the Unitarian schism. Some congregations divided over Unitarianism, and there was confusion over which side owned the parish property. In 1820, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in the Dedham case that the majority of the parish (not just the church members) were entitled to the property. This effectively disenfranchised conservatives in the Boston area, who were usually the minority.[77]

The ruling by Justice Isaac Parker, who happened to be a Unitarian, determined that the minority in a church split not only lost its claim on the church property but also lost its status as an established church. As tax-supported congregations continued to defect to Unitarianism, the Dedham case increased conservative support for disestablishment. In 1833, the state constitution was amended to eliminate church taxes.[78]

Other theological disputesEdit

 
Andover Theological Seminary, established in 1808

As the Unitarian division was solidifying, the New Divinity was itself fracturing into different branches. Timothy Dwight, who became president of Yale University in 1795, ensured that Edwardsean theology dominated at that institution. He was also responsible for creating a theologically moderate party among Edwardseans that placed more emphasis on human action through means of grace. Yale professor Nathaniel William Taylor carried this further in what became known as the New Haven theology, which essentially claimed that humans could reject sin and choose God. [79]

Critics found in the New Haven theology echoes of Unitarianism and Pelagianism, and the Edwardseans were enmeshed in the Taylorite Controversy through the 1830s. Traditional Edwardseans such as Asahel Nettleton, Bennet Tyler and Edward Dorr Griffin opposed it. Tyler founded Hartford Seminary in 1833 to counteract New Haven theology.[80]

20th centuryEdit

In 1931 the National Council of the Congregational Churches of the United States and the General Convention of the Christian Church, a body from the Restoration Movement tradition of the early 19th century, merged to form the Congregational Christian Churches. The Congregationalists were used to a more formal, less evangelistic form of worship than Christian Church members, who mostly came from rural areas of the South and the Midwest. Both groups, however, held to local autonomy and eschewed binding creedal authority.

In the early 20th century some Congregational (later Congregational Christian) churches took exception to the beginnings of a growth of regional or national authority in bodies outside the local church, such as mission societies, national committees, and state conferences. Some congregations opposed liberalizing influences that appeared to mitigate traditional views of sin and corollary doctrines such as the substitutionary atonement of Jesus. In 1948, some adherents of these two streams of thought (mainly the latter one) started a new fellowship, the Conservative Congregational Christian Conference (CCCC). It was the first major fellowship to organize outside of the mainstream Congregational body since 1825 when the Unitarians formally founded their own body.

In 1957, the General Council of Congregational Christian Churches in the U.S. merged with the Evangelical and Reformed Church to form the United Church of Christ. About 90% of the CC congregations affiliated with the General Council joined the United Church of Christ. Some churches abstained from the merger while others voted it down. Most of the latter congregations became members of either the CCCC (mentioned above) or the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches. The latter was formed by churches and people who objected to the UCC merger because of concerns that the new national church and its regional bodies represented extra-congregational authorities that would interfere with a congregation's right to govern itself. Thus, the NACCC includes congregations of a variety of theological positions. Still other congregations chose not to affiliate with any particular association of churches, or only with regional or local ones.

BeliefsEdit

Puritanism (17th century)Edit

 
Gorham Congregational Church of Gorham, New Hampshire, built in 1862, now affiliated with the United Church of Christ

In the 17th century, Congregationalists were Puritans who initially identified themselves as members of the Church of England.[6] As Calvinistic Protestants, Congregational churches shared common beliefs with other Reformed churches, such as sola scriptura,[81] unconditional election,[82] covenant theology,[83] Reformed worship, Reformed baptismal theology, and Reformed views on the Lord's Supper. The Savoy Declaration, a modification of the Westminster Confession of Faith, was adopted as a Congregationalist confessional statement in Massachusetts in 1680 and in Connecticut in 1708.[84]

Congregational churches differed from the Presbyterian and continental Reformed churches in the belief that churches should be composed of "visible saints" or the elect. To ensure that only regenerated persons were admitted as full members, Congregational churches required prospective members to provide a conversion narrative describing their personal conversion experience.[85]

The essential Puritan belief was that people are saved by grace alone and not by any merit from doing good works. At the same time, Congregationalists also believed that men and women "could labor to make themselves appropriate vessels of saving grace" [emphasis in original].[49] They could accomplish this through Bible reading, prayer and doing good works. This doctrine was called preparationism, and nearly all Congregationalists were preparationists to some extent. Whether a person had experienced conversion or not, they were encouraged to live godly lives in preparation for salvation.[49]

The process of conversion was described in different ways, but most ministers agreed that there were 3 essential stages. The first stage was humiliation or sorrow for having sinned against God. The second stage was justification or adoption characterized by a sense of having been forgiven and accepted by God through Christ's mercy. The third stage was sanctification, the ability to live a holy life out of gladness toward God.[86]

All settlers, whether full members or not, were required to attend church services and were subject to church discipline.[87] The Lord's Supper, however, was reserved to full members only.[85] While Congregational churches practiced infant baptism, only full members could present their children for baptism. It was believed that the children of church members already shared in their parent's covenant relationship with the church, and they therefore had a right to baptism by virtue of being born into a Christian household.[88]

New Divinity (1760–1860)Edit

The First Great Awakening divided Congregationalists into the pro-revival New Lights and the anti-revival Old Lights (who were themselves divided between traditional, Old Calvinists and liberal Calvinists who leaned toward Arminianism). It was New Light theologian and revivalist Jonathan Edwards who would have the most profound affect on New England Congregationalism in the post-Awakening period. After his death, his followers would found a school of thought known as the New Divinity that would dominate Congregational thinking into the 19th century.[89]

Free willEdit

The most influential of Edwards's works was The Freedom of the Will, which was written to combat Arminian arguments against Calvinism.[90] According to church historian Robert Caldwell, Edwards argued that "divine sovereignty over human actions and meaningful freedom of the will are not mutually exclusive." Edwards agreed that salvation was entirely God's work, but he also believed that the decision to repent and believe in Christ was also a free choice. He could arrive at this conclusion because of a distinction he made between the natural ability and the moral inability to place one's faith in Christ. Humans have a natural ability to repent and turn to Christ but lack the moral ability to do so because of the effects of original sin. In the words of Caldwell, "though they could repent and trust in Christ (natural ability), they will not do so (moral inability) because of sin."[91] According to Edwards, then, humans have free will and a disposition to sin that leads them to choose sin over the gospel unless God in his sovereignty chooses to intervene, change the sinful disposition, and enable the soul to turn toward God.[92]

This distinction had implications for New Divinity preaching and evangelism that were departures from traditional Puritan beliefs. For the Puritans, conversion was a gradual process involving spiritual crises, humiliation, and sorrow for sin. Only after these struggles and utilizing the means of grace (prayer, seeking God, reading the Bible, and attending church) would the individual discern within himself faith and love for Christ and be encouraged to repent. New Divinity ministers, however, called all sinners to repent and believe the gospel immediately because everyone had the natural ability to do so. There was no reason, they said, to wait for any period of conviction and spiritual struggle. While immediate repentance was criticized by Old Calvinists, there was practically little difference between the two approaches. When asked how to repent, Old Calvinists and New Divinity ministers had the same advice: seek God through the means of grace and in time God might give the seeker new affections and inclinations to believe in Christ.[93]

Disinterested benevolenceEdit

The New Divinity's theology of religious experience was influenced by Edwards's works Treatise Concerning Religious Affections and The Nature of True Virtue. The New Divinity argued that the true Christian seeks the good of all things, including God and other people, above themselves. This was called "disinterested benevolence" because Christian benevolence is never self-serving, unlike the benevolence of the unconverted.[94]

Disinterested benevolence was the basis for piety, according to the New Divinity. It originates at conversion when the Holy Spirit was believed to renew the heart so that the convert desires union with Christ through faith and embraces the way of the cross, which is self-sacrifice. In this, self-love is eliminated and the convert seeks happiness in God and his creation.[94] For Edwards, a disinterest in one's self and a preoccupation with God's moral excellence was an indication that such a person had been regenerated. Such persons no longer worried over the status of their own souls because their love for God and the contemplation of his glory made assurance of one's salvation virtually an afterthought.[95]

The theology of disinterested benevolence led Samuel Hopkins, pastor of First Congregational Church in Newport, Rhode Island, to oppose slavery for the good of the enslaved. He wrote several treatises on the subject in the 1770s decades before the abolition movement gained strength in America.[96] Disinterested benevolence also inspired much of the missionary activity of the period, such as the creation of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions. Many New Divinity ministers and missionaries were inspired by The Life of David Brainerd published by Edwards as an account of the ministry of David Brainerd, a missionary to the Delaware Indians of New Jersey. Brainerd's life was held up as the ideal of disinterested benevolence.[97]

ReferencesEdit

CitationsEdit

  1. ^ Bremer 2009, pp. 2–3.
  2. ^ Bremer 2009, pp. 9,20.
  3. ^ a b Cooper 1999, p. 18.
  4. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 20–22.
  5. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 17,19: "Likewise, though it had been practiced in New England for several years, they reaffirmed from First Corinthians that 'churches should be churches of saints' and must therefore require of members a test of grace, or conversion."
  6. ^ a b Bremer 2009, p. 20.
  7. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 13.
  8. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 24,26.
  9. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 114,221.
  10. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 31.
  11. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 14,33.
  12. ^ Bremer 2009, pp. 21–22.
  13. ^ Walker 1894, p. 116.
  14. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 42–43.
  15. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 47–49.
  16. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 47.
  17. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 50–52.
  18. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 55–56.
  19. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 57.
  20. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 76.
  21. ^ Cooper 1999, pp. 69–70.
  22. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 79–84.
  23. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 165–168.
  24. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 57–59.
  25. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 60.
  26. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 62.
  27. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 63–64.
  28. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 67.
  29. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 72.
  30. ^ Walker 1894, p. 199.
  31. ^ Walker 1894, p. 200.
  32. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 200–201.
  33. ^ Kidd 2007, p. 21.
  34. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 202–204.
  35. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 207–208.
  36. ^ Walker 1894, p. 206.
  37. ^ a b c Youngs 1998, p. 83.
  38. ^ a b Noll 2002, p. 162.
  39. ^ Walker 1894, p. 251.
  40. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 73.
  41. ^ Walker 1894, p. 252.
  42. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 74.
  43. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 74–75.
  44. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 79.
  45. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 82.
  46. ^ Walker 1894, p. 259.
  47. ^ Walker 1894, pp. 261–262.
  48. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 84.
  49. ^ a b c Youngs 1998, p. 88.
  50. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 89.
  51. ^ a b Caldwell 2012, p. 33.
  52. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 89–91.
  53. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 34.
  54. ^ Caldwell 2012, pp. 34–35.
  55. ^ Taves 1999, p. 71.
  56. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 108–109.
  57. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 114.
  58. ^ Williston 1894, p. 311.
  59. ^ Williston 1894, pp. 309-310.
  60. ^ Williston 1894, pp. 310-311.
  61. ^ Rohrer 1999, pp. 17–19.
  62. ^ Williston 1894, p. 313.
  63. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 127–128.
  64. ^ Williston 1894, p. 323.
  65. ^ Bacon, Field & Gillett 1843, pp. 340,344,346,348.
  66. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 129–130.
  67. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 130.
  68. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 121.
  69. ^ Thompson 1895, pp. 72.
  70. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 121–122.
  71. ^ Youngs 1998, pp. 122–123.
  72. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 127.
  73. ^ Walker 1894, p. 333.
  74. ^ a b Cayton 1997, pp. 86–87.
  75. ^ Cayton 1997, p. 87.
  76. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 40.
  77. ^ a b Cayton 1997, p. 88.
  78. ^ a b Youngs 1998, p. 128.
  79. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 126.
  80. ^ Kurian & Lamport 2016, p. 1622.
  81. ^ Cooper 1999, p. 14.
  82. ^ Walker 1894, p. 215.
  83. ^ Campbell 2013.
  84. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 52.
  85. ^ a b Youngs 1998, pp. 40–41.
  86. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 41.
  87. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 50.
  88. ^ Walker 1894, p. 170.
  89. ^ Youngs 1998, p. 108.
  90. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 43.
  91. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 44.
  92. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 45.
  93. ^ Caldwell 2012, pp. 46–47.
  94. ^ a b Caldwell 2012, p. 47.
  95. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 48.
  96. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 49.
  97. ^ Caldwell 2012, p. 49–51.

BibliographyEdit

Further readingEdit