User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 18

Thanks!

You are speedy! [1] Active Banana (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

haha its cool dude

right on dude. i guess the back of my hand really didnt need a wikipedia... but it sure kept me from being bored all day at work.

but ya gotta admit. it was kinda funny (which coincidentally fits the guidelines for a G3 tag, not a G1 tag)

have a great date mate

Frostypb88 (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

also is there anyway you could email me a transcript of that artical. i think it was hillarious and im going to repost it on my facebook. message me if you could.

thanks!!

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

im going to take that as a you didnt think it was neerly as funny as i did. i dont see any reason you cant just copy and paste to an email.

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Duke of York's Royal Military School

Thank's for your help ref correcting OriginalFatTulip's vandalism of the Duke of York's Royal Military School page. Much appreciated.

Spicandspan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicandspan (talk • contribs) 00:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Why is everyone reverting constructive edits to Kal Ho Naa Ho?

Can you please tell me what's so bad about the edit I made to Kal Ho Naa Ho that it needed to be reverted (three times so far)? I am only here to help. BollyJeff || talk 01:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Tasha9713

Re your warning, you made a typo which is why the template didn't work I fixed it for you. Mjroots (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

User:TEK

Hi, Gogo Dodo. The pages I created (User:TEK and User talk:TEK were intended to redirect to my user page and talk page, for convenience. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

R.V.C.Bodley

...which you deleted. I was asked to create this page for an IP (see T.E.Lawrence talk page.) I explained this situation on the discussion page. Might you restore it so the IP can build the article? Rumiton (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Your header

Looks good. I copied it. :-) TEK (talk • e-mail) 14:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

My friend's band needs a wiki page...

The Show. and you deleted it. What did I do wrong? Can you help me make one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me.

I recently created a page, and it's been deleted without reason or warning. Please explain?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Alaur24

Hello, I was wondering why you deleted my newly created article. I put alot of work into it, and it wasn't finished. You left no reason why you deleted it. And I would like one. You can't just delete something without a reason for doing so. I followed the rules, so what is the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Could I try again?

Well I didn't actully finish it. Is it possible you could put it back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Please?

Well I wasn't finished it. Is it possible if you could put it back?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I find that very unfair and disrespectful. I'm published, but not as a book. Instead online. Many people are so. I don't get it. All my hard work just went down the drain. Thanks. And the link? On other pages other people have done the total opposite to the rules, and still theirs isn't deleted. Wikipedia is ment to be for people to publish their own stuff, but how can we if people like you delete it.

Just put it back up!

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I see your point. But I don't think you've looked into this enough.

On the website I've published it, I've won several rewards for my books, stories & Poems. Does that mean anything at all? --Alaur24 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, on the website people can review you? So how 'bout that? :) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, okay. I give up. You win, smarty pants. Haha. Oh well... I guess I'll just have to wait then. Anyway, do you do anything besides Wikipedia? Your like on it all the time, haha. Or is that to much of a personal question to answer? :P

--Alaur24 (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

That's okay. I'll stick around. What time is it for you? It's 6:56 PM here. =) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

the grumpysaurus page

please please please don't delete it, it's about my dad, he doesn't kno whow to use the internet, so the whole idea is seeing how long it takes for him to find the page, he picked the title, there is a £50 bet on so please please please don't delete it!!! let me know x —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

my page is a joke towards my father, that me and my siblings have made, he knows and thinks it's hilarious, and before we had a chance to show the grandparents, you have deleted it, it is not offencive otherwise i would not have done it!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

...for blocking this vandal. I frankly cannot understand how a person can waste his time on doing something like this. Funny isn't it... Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. Yeh, I hope so. He is angry that Playback singer, an article on which he kept adding his sneaky vandalism, is protected now. Thanks again, Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

:(

i am not having a go but why did you delete my article why??? i made article for all my family and friends to see but you have gone and ruined it!! :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovemcdonalds (talk • contribs) 21:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Be careful!

I see you're getting quite a few "enemies" there — be careful! TEK (talk • e-mail) 23:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

This isn't anything new for me as it has been going on for years. It goes with being an admin. I wouldn't call them "enemies" either, just upset people who think I've spoiled their fun by deleting their articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

History of E! Entertainment Television

E! Entertainment Television Movietime original files and docs support that Larry Namer, Brian Owens, Rick Portin, Mike Sobel, Bill Zaccheo, Mark Hale, and others launched the network. If you research Alan Mruvka you will discover that his own info, which he wrote on his Wiki bio, is ridiculous and exaggerated--how could he produce 20,000 hours of programming (much less one, he had nothing to do with production at Movietime) when the network was only on the air (20 hours a day plus infomercials) 11,000 hours before he was removed from Movietime!! And if born in 1967, did he really go to college and have a business background, and then come up with a network idea when he was 16 years old in 1984? Any sourced materials that support the above claims have been manipulated, probably by Mruvka. He supplied some of the money that started the network and was on the Board of Movietime until removed by the cable operators in early 1989. He had absolutely no operational responsibilities for Movietime, though he has erroneously claimed production responsibility in his self-penned Wikipedia bio. If you want pdf's of the Movietime launch, I can email them to you. ---- Pienza89 (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

By the Way, I forgot to add that most of the first two paragraphs of the E! history were written by me before I formally registered. I worked with all the people who launched the network, and named those most responsible for its successful launch. They were the operational heads of departments which created the concept and did the work and came up with the ideas and operation to do the launch, which was financed by a half dozen companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

I looked at the Greenwood press attribute which you refer to, which ironically is a channel description written by me when I worked in the U.K. for a cable company and described E! for our channel guide. At least put the following in, which is directly from the article and more accurate than letting two people take the credit for the significant idea, work, and contribution of others:

"launched by Larry Namer, Alan Mruvka, Brian Owens, and others on July 31 1987 as Movietime a low-budget service that....... " —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

History of E! Entertainment Television -- your source for intro has been written inaccurately

The Anthony Slide book, 1991, does not say that Mruvka launched the channel, WHICH HE DIDN'T, but wrote that Mruvka co-founded the network, WHICH HE DID BECAUSE HE WAS THE FIRST INVESTOR: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........."(page 94) Mruvka had no operational responsibility whatsoever for the network at its launch, or thereafter--he was on the Board of Directors and one of more than twenty shareholders at the network's launch. And author Slide had no facts for his info, as HBO and the cable TV operators did not invest in Movietime until one year after its launch. He probably had interviewed Mruvka or Namer and got the full story wrong.

This is what I got from googling ("The television industry: a historical dictionary mruvka"_ your source for the Mruvka claim on launching Movietime: http://www.uksuperweb.co.uk/tv.html to to #17 . Otherwise that google just goes circular to wikipedia . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Once more before the breach--A "launch of a network " is not the same as a "founding"

Once more, quoting directly from the page (94) of the source you are using, "The Television Industry: a historical dictionary" by Anthony Slide:

"Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio,"(page 94)

This is not by any means the same as what you have now written in Wikipedia:

"E! Entertainment Television was founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka[1][2] on July 31, 1987 as Movietime, a service that aired movie trailers.........."

The channel was absolutely not founded in 1987 (it was incorporated as the Movietime business about a year earlier), but it was indeed launched on July 31, 1987 by a group you will or can not recognize, and I will try to find a true source about this. Meanwhile, if you must recognize the veracity here as the Slide book material, you would do best to complete the error by exactly writing/inserting what Slide wrote: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio," notwithstanding that Slide did not have a clue about what he was writing here. Or you can let me recognize Mruvka, as one of many launchers, which I previously wrote to compromise and let him have his ego-rub.

Truly, take a look at the Alan Mruvka Wiki bio he wrote, which has many blatantly ridiculous claims--PLEASE LOOK AT IT. Mruvka writes "While with E!, Mruvka oversaw production of over 20,000 hours of programming ........" There are 8,760 hours in a year, so even if he had anything to do with production (which he did not), in the year and a half Mruvka was associated with the network, was he really 13,000 hours of the network, including the thousands of hours of paid infomercial hours late at night? And "Mruvka was born ....in 1968, " and "studied architecture at the University of Miami and New York’s Pratt Institute," so was he really just nineteen years old when Movietime launched." Lots of well-deserving people don't need Mruvka stealing their due. Pienza89 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

I am learning how to work with Wikipedia, thank you, and I will dig out some archives and try to get this right when I have time. BUT meanwhile, I find some hypocrisy in your actions in that you insist from the Anthony Slide book that Namer and Mruvka founded the network, but now you won't complete the Anthony Slide's statement that HBO and others launched the network. If you believe me, then you'd accept my edit. If you don't believe me, then you would fully put in what the Slide source wrote. I don't get the inconsistency. If you use the source, then use the source and write "Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........." And if you don't, and believe what I have written, then go back to my edits. It should be "either, or" , and not your pick and choice from a written source and me--that's consistency and I would think that is what Wikipedia is trying to achieve in these "factual" disputes. Pienza89 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

You wrote that the HBO group was in the second paragraph so there was no need to put the complete Slide reference into the first paragraph, but I COMPPLETELY WROTE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH. The HBO et al ownership is what I wrote, which I mentioned when I first wrote you. Yes I wrote that paragraph before I registered, because why register when I was the originator of almost all of the first two paragraphs? When Mruvka changed the opening and took out the other people's names who launched the network, I had to register to start editing that text. But again, the second paragraph was completely written by me so I stand by what I wrote: you either accept what I wrote or completely take out the (my) non-referenced material and put in the Slide page 94. Otherwise your "corrections" are illogical, using my material when it seems right to you but then not using it when it might be in conflict with an interview with Mruvka. Pienza89 (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

"It appears to me that the second paragraph evolved (like most content on Wikipedia) from edits by multiple editors, not you as an anonymous IP alone." I am sorry that you tire so easily, but, again, I wrote all of the second paragraph except for the last sentence, so it did not stem from "multiple editors." You do a disservice when you challenge the veracity of a person who made a solid contribution and then had another person change it. There were no multiple editors in the second paragraph, and the HBO et al sentences, as well as all except the last, were mine, alone. So why don't you remove them, unless you continue to want it both ways, accepting what I write but then dropping what I write as you editorialize. Pienza89 (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

making a bio

how do i work the template ?...i tried to do a simple thing like changing my name on the page an it wouldnt make the change for me ...why is that ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

this is youngflizo201 ...i didnt kno hhow to reply back to a message ...but i had sent u a previous message about making a bio...an im not makin an autobiography...young flizo is an artist out of jersey that i support ...an i felt is though i wanted to do this for him ...an i dont kno how to do it ...i got everything written but i dnt kno how to edit the title and change it to "Young Flizo"..it still has the Category:Hip hop biography stubs title up there...and i also want to kno when wuld i be able to see this wikipedia article for him if i was to google his name like the other artist that have one  ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

dealing with vandals

I was just in a bit of an edit war with User talk:221.134.144.14 over Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham..., and I see over 20 messages on the talk page for vandalism, and a big message at the top that I don't really understand. Why can't they be stopped/blocked permanently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 23:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I saw up to 7 warnings per month, plus I saw 6 "final" warnings and a 24 hour block. What does it take to do a full block, murder?  :-) BollyJeff || talk 00:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

You're very kind

To remove my silly templated warning from your user talk. "Automated tool is no excuse" is 100% correct. Mea culpa. I don't know how it happened but it was obviously my fault. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 00:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

To touch on another matter. Is this image on commons? I don't want to rev/del without a significant reason, but in light of the recent media rants I did not want to leave it unattended. The vandal meant the image as an insult but I don't know if it really is an insult. If you feel lead to action, please...go ahead. Tiderolls 00:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for protecting my userpage

Thanks, that's fine, Yes "inappropriate images" indeed. Not that I'm not used to it in my (former) line of work here. I seem to have stumbled into quite a nest of litte thugs here. Herostratus (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I noticed that at least one person posting used what looks like a typical real life name. Given the nature of the material being posted, is this a problem I wonder. I guess nothing more can be done about it? Herostratus (talk) 04:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The Show

I added new references. The album is on amazon and billboard, and this band is very important. they just recently played the O2 Arena, also played by Kelly Clarkson and Hole. They have also been mentioned in publications such as Jersey Beat and Village Voice. Although they are still an indie band, they have many radio stations internationally that have the Show in consistant rotation. The album has sold over 30,000 copies, and still is selling consistently. The Show are going to be huge pretty soon, so their wiki has to come now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 03:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of "Elise Trent"

Hi! The page I created was for a college class and the lesson being taught was "self-branding." one of our assignments was to create a page about ourselves. I created the page NOT cause I wanted a page about myself but because I have to for class. As proof that we did the assignment, we have to email the link of the wikipedia page to our professor. I would highly appreciate you not deleting the page again as I cannot turning my homework if you do.

Thank you.

Elise —Preceding unsigned comment added by EliseMTrent (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm afraid that you'll have to create your page at another site, such as Wetpaint. Wikipedia is not the site to host pages about yourself, and there should be no exceptions to the regulations. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for trollwatching

Thanks, I was starting to get sick of that guy. Though I'm expecting more, I don't think this is through yet. I'm going to go to bed now. Though if when I wake up I find all of my contributions have been blanked and my userpage has been moved to "Elektrik Shoos on wheels" I'm going to wave my virtual fist at you. :) Cheers, goodnight. elektrikSHOOS 08:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Elektrik Shoos to User talk:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)

• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User:Elektrik Shoos to User:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)

What? Oh, I'm sorry. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Partsearch Technologies

I dont understand how this page is advertising when its information. Admin Acroterion let me know about how this criteria and I have not copied any material directly from the company website. Please tell me how to make sure this page stays up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John.neidhardt (talk • contribs) 18:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Page Craig Buie

Why did you delete my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frecky04 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

MACEO MAYS

Maceo Mays is a well known author to wit: can be verified. There has been many attempts to enter his personal bio including citations and references are deleted. How should we proceed so his information will not be deleted?

Sieberr1 (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Hon. Denise Chilton

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Sock is back

Sadly enough, the sock is back and he started vandalising Playback singer again, removing sourced information and adding false. I think the page should be protected again for a longer period of time. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Spam on user talk pages

In regard to your block of Eatinqueens... I haven't been here long, but I've already seen this a couple of times now (new users spamming/advertising on their talk pages). Is this something that needs to be mentioned in policy (people think it's ok?) or is it merely a way that users think they can get away with through going unnoticed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gz33 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

It is indeed pretty common. I'm not sure exactly why though. Sometimes it is like you say, they are trying to avoid being noticed. Other times, I think they just don't know and think their talk page is a good place to put their ad. No policy addition is necessary as it is already covered in blocking policy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I see its covered there now. I was looking at the Promotion policy and the link policies which seemed to give of the idea that they mainly meant for article space gz³³ (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

The blocking policy allows for spam/advertising blocks no matter where they edit. The funniest spam I see is on Talk:Main Page. I really don't understand that one since there are big warning messages all over the place with that, but I guess some editors are just determined to place their ad. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Any spam/vandalism here is pretty hard to understand really, what with how quickly it tends to disappear. I mean is a couple of seconds of display time really that worth it?gz³³ (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Another sock

Clear sock puppet - Wisdom24 (talk · contribs). He opened his account on the 9th of July and thus can edit the page now. This is frankly becoming tedious. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

External Links to Reviews

Hi Gogo Dodo,

I was adding a few professional game reviews from this site - http://www.download-free-games.com/review/all/score-high/ - when I got flagged for external links.

Would it be appropriate to keep adding links to these reviews on relevant pages?

Thanks,

JimTheGamer (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

list of bhangra bands

why have you edited it and included hip hop acts which are NOT LIVE BHANGRA BANDS?

stop vandalizing proper pages dude

JOSH? a bhangra band

you gotta be kidding me

do you even know what bhangra is you little folkhopper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs) 02:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Ufuoma Ejenobor

hello Gogo, thank you for you contributions and correction on the Ufuoma Ejenobor page. it shows that we still have committed editors on the site. But it would be more appropriate to check on facts before completely deleting an article especially if the articles are not easily verified from your side of the world. if there are problems regarding a page, they should be discussed and PROPERLY VERIFIED before deletion. we could work together on building and correcting articles in which language and other factors are lacking. thank yo very muchAnnaadoms (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

?Annaadoms (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

the edit for feburary has already been handled yeah? (i hope i am not the confused one now) there were other links on the page ..maybe you werent patient enough to read them anyway its a lot of work now starting to search for them all over again. take your time to read through them all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaadoms (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

the February edit has been attended to already. there are reliable links there..you just weren't patient enough to read through them all. it would take a long while to source through for them again. let me know if there are other correctionsAnnaadoms (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Gogo, consider having a look at the history Ufuoma Ejenobor. Annaadoms does not seem to grasp some of the rules here, as far as puffery, reliable sources, etc. are concerned and it's getting a bit tiresome. I mean, even if this, "She also earned a badge as the school’s Head girl 1998/99 session," were relevant, it would still need verification. We have either a fan or an autobiography. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

I also think I hear some quacking; time will tell. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I would like your opinion

While out on my nightly patrol, I came across an odd page. I would like your opinion/decision on what should happen. The anomaly in question is Subash Sinchuari. I was going to add an A7 tag, but I checked the history. Using the very first version, [2], I wouldn't add a CSD tag (I'm more cautious than most when it to CSD tags, though). The strangest part is that the only non-bot to edit it, and cut out 95 percent of the content, is the initial author. The page isn't truly blank so neither did I tag it for G7. I'm just not sure how to handle it. CSD? Prod? If there's someone/someplace you want me to ask, lemme know. TheTito ^Discuss 10:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the help. I was getting a headache looking at his contris. TheTito ^Discuss 04:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Message from WikiEditor90546

this company is significant to the United States of America and it will be on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor90546 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Jelin george Fashion Designer

Hi

I had contributed and article as she is upcoming fashion designer n i had submit it do help me how can i contribute on wikepedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfreddsouza (talk • contribs) 05:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry Gogo

I repent.

Oh yeah and what did I get caught for exactly? Cause I did some bad stuff but I'm clean from now on, I swear. Wouldn't want to get banned for some prior misdeeds! I can assure you - no bad edits (NBE) post 2:39 AM Central Time July 20, 2010! Oh and good job on all the medals you have on your main page - I hope to be like you one day! :) 66.112.225.187 (talk) 07:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

WHY

why are u deleting my page??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkohlwein (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Amigo Choi

May I know why you deleted the article? Thanks. 116.49.135.38 (talk) 12:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted twice back in 2009, but I did delete Talk:Amigo Choi, which you created, because you created an article in the Talk name space. I recommend that you sign up for an account so that you can create the article in the proper name space or make a request to create an article at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

No wonder. Would you mind telling which page under Articles for creation should I submit the request? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.135.38 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Why not just create a username? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

I second SchmuckyTheCat's suggestion. If you create an account, you can create the article yourself. But if you choose to not create an account, if you use the WP:Article Wizard, one of the last steps will let you make a Articles for Creation request in the proper place. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Would it be possible to have the content back so that I can create the article? 116.49.135.38 (talk) 18:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I am sure there is a very good reason for you not to have a named account. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

If you create a user account, I would be happy to restore the talk page into your user space, but there isn't much there. You wrote a single sentence stating that she was a television presenter for TVB. The rest were category and stub templates. It is probably easier for you to just rewrite the article from scratch since it would need more than a single sentence to meet the notability guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

page deleted.. requesting help to return article

Deletion review for The X Factor Fan Site

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The X Factor Fan Site. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Robtencer (talk) 20:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Can you tell me why so many admins wanted to delete my article so quickly? Without giving advice or criticism, or editing help to keep the page, they were so quick to delete, that the page went live and within an hour, it was gone. Please tell me, if you are the type of person to help, or are the type of person to make speedy deletions? I am pleading for your help, to make a worthy version of my article, that will withstand attack. Are you that person?

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Yo yo Gogo

Howdy! Well, saw your GRAND WORK on the Kevin Mann article. Must say, i'm impressed! However, please please please go ahead and change that FA-class to something more believable. I don't know why you changed it to an FA article in the first place because obviously it doesn't meet that standard =/

Your friend, Hugo

PS. !!!!!! "This user has written or significantly contributed to 2 featured lists on Wikipedia."

Just read this on your main page... must say, I'm MEGA-happy for you! Well, goodnight, and keep up the great work, sailor. 66.112.225.187 (talk) 06:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.112.225.187 (talk) 06:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

The article was labeled as an FA-class article by an anonymous IP back in June. I did not do that. I have corrected the assessment. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

bobby smalldridge

hi

im new to wikipedia, and tried to set up a page for bobby smalldridge, this has been deleted by you,

he has appeard on television a number of times and debuts on the feature film in 2011 called foster, he is also listed on imdb

i would love to add him, on this site but i think i have done something wrong can you help?

dan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danburridge (talk • contribs) 12:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

Can you explain to me why you deleted my page? I created it for a reason. Not for it to be immediately deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.150.144.139 (talk) 03:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Since you are not logged in and have no deleted edits under this IP, I don't know what page you are referring to. However, it is likely because whatever topic you were writing about did not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Wild Nothing

You should not have deleted this page. They are one of the more successful and lauded indie rock bands this year with lots of people like myself looking to learn more about them.

Stellar review: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14280-gemini/

Number 2 in sales: http://www.insound.com/

Honestly, I don't know how much you keep up with music, but if you have little or no knowledge of current music trends, you should probably refrain from deleting things you know nothing about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.132.158 (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Ignoring your personal attack, the article was deleted because it made no claim towards him meeting the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. In fact, the entire article was just an Infobox template, his name, his stage name, that he is an "indie pop" artist, and where he was from. You are welcome to create an account (or log back into your account) and recreate the article providing citations to establish his notability. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Admin's Barnstar
		Thanks --Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 03:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Notice of ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic List of bhangra bands. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:52, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

NuclearWarfare‎

Could you also semi-protect the page too, please? - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

It's set, though NativeForeigner and I were overwriting each other. I backed out and will let NativeForeigner set the final protection settings. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. :) If you are good with filters, you might want to check the filter that is supposed to protect the page from stuff like that and add to it as they seem to have changed their...not sure what you call that, sick BS. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm looking in to it. Yes, the message has been changing. They haven't quite decided what the message should be. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Okie Dokie, just wanted to let you know of that in case you weren't aware. Seems like you all have it covered, so I will step back and let the admins have it from here. Great job all of you. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:57, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, either I fixed or I made a total mess. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

What do they have against NW? NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 05:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:30, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, we will know once the protection comes off in a couple days, though I think it should stay on for longer than that, but that isn't up to me. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of A Harlot Demise

Sorry about leaving the page idle and unkempt lol but is there a possibility I could get information on how upload an image to the article, this way I can make the page something nice to look at. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chelios2 (talk • contribs) 06:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Ruggamugg - another account?

I see you just banned this user for abusing multiple accounts. It looks like Sugerall (talk · contribs) is another one. --Biker Biker (talk) 07:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Block on User:Fineonegolfks

I'd block account creation as I suspect this is a series of spam accounts. Regards --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 09:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Interesting. I see the CU discovered a pile of accounts. The IP that they all originated from has been blocked for awhile. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Indeed, my whack-a-mole revealed more than I expected. AD Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 17:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

You did a great job spotting the pattern. Good work! =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

email

Gogo Dodo, Just giving you the heads up that I sent you an email. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariaflags (talk • contribs) 16:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

User:ElSonoma

Could you look at User:ElSonoma who recreated The Sonoma Dude less than 13 hours after it was deleted yesterday? He had the gall to admit on my talkpage yesterday that he was paid to promote the subject and then made the same claim today on the article's talkpage. Hopefully, by the time I finish this message, I will see that you already took care of the situation. Or, you might be taking a breather - but, it's back to the grindstone for you. ;) ----moreno oso (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of "Mimvi" page

Re: 23:56, 26 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Mimvi" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content)) Before posting more material nominated for deletion, I wanted to draw your attention to the fact that though Mimvi is a new company, they are a publicly traded company on the OTC. See: (OTCBB: MIMV) as stated in the deleted article. The search engine is a live and functional entity as noted by the linked url in the article, which also links to other related wikipedia articles such as the page on Mimvi founder, Kasian Franks See latest revision in my personal space: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Datumfestus/Mimvi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Datumfestus (talk • contribs) 00:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:51, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

substansive content

Hi, GOGO DODO, i am new on wikipedia, i tried to upload my collge information on Wikipedia, and i wish that if someone serch it on google my college name would be there as in the list of institutions in LEYTON UK. i am not fimiliar with encyclopedic writing so what what information i felt better i keep that on my article. but u have deleted it with this reason.

* 18:27, 19 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs) deleted "Mont rose college" ‎ (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content)

Please suggest me what to do now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrosecollege (talk • contribs) 14:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Ouran Host Club page

The Ouran host club page is being vandalized by people. Maybe you can block the page to keep people from vandalizing? 108.0.243.72 (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't see anything recently that is vandalism. I do see some editors cutting down on the character descriptions on the main article, but I wouldn't classify that as vandalism. If you have an issue with cutting down the length of the descriptions, I recommend that you bring up the issue on the article talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

If you looked at the history, there were people who wrote that Tamaki was an idiot and that Haruhi should've ended up with Hikaru. Check this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ouran_High_School_Host_Club&action=historysubmit&diff=376056585&oldid=376034810 108.0.243.72 (talk) 03:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

I missed the part about the "idiot". Since I don't read the manga or watch the show, I don't know anything about the interaction between characters, so I don't have enough context to understand that one character being with another is totally wrong or not. Since you appear to have either read the manga or watched the episodes, you are welcome to correct any errors. As for your original request to protect the article, I don't think that this is necessary at this time. There is very little editing activity on the article and what there is not obvious vandalism to an uninformed reader or some kind of edit war that requires intervention. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Dude, stop speedy deleting stuff!

It's really annoying when people do that! --SamB (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

In particular, I was annoyed at the way you seem to have speedy deleted the Legostar Galactica page without warning -- or at least, you didn't mention having given any warning in the deletion message, and I can't exactly check now. (That's really the thing I find most infuriating about deletion: it's hard for mere mortals to see for themselves whether or not an article really deserved it, unless they happen to have somehow snarfed a copy of its' entire history just before deletion...)

Anyway, in this case, it seems the page would not have met the criteria for speedy deletion if it had made a plausible claim of importance. It seems that this would have been easy to fix: the creator thinks that Legostar Galactica is the first webcomic to be made of Legos; even if he's wrong, it seems to have been among the first, and very influential. Even without a reliable source, such a claim would (if plausible) make A7 inapplicable.

Sorry to have started off so harsh, even if deletion of stuff I might have liked does tend to make me cranky... -- SamB (talk) 20:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Elockid‎

Might be a good idea to semi-protect his talk page for 12 or 24. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:57, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Good idea. Done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks Dude. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I was busy filling out some forms about this particular problem. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

No worries. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for handling the situation! Elockid ^(Talk) 11:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:06, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Message from User:Don Jow

My page has been deleted five times thus far today, and when asked why all I receive is a link to a page I have read with less than sufficient reason for your actions. I have been told that it was deleted because the page was about a real person. This shows great hypocrisy in you considering there are hundreds, even thousands of pages on this site about people. I have been told its because I am not "important" or "significant" enough to have my own page. I would like to ask you this; who are you to judge how important or significant I am? This article has not been left up long enough to receive and editing to add substantial material, you know me on no personal level, and it is thoroughly insulting and obscene of you to judge a person based upon their financial income or time spent in front of a camera. I have also been told I did not have links to a place providing some sort of material in which you provide no explanation of what you want. I provided links in all of my material, many of which redirected the reader within this website. I put the time into writing this to you, and I expect a real response this time. Or maybe I should ask for someone famous since the only "real" people on this site are? Please, answer me. Why am I not allowed to make this page? I have followed all of your guidelines and you fail to provide me with one reason why you have acted in this way.

I thank you in advance for the un-through and un-helpful answer that I will receive.

Sincerely, Don Jow, the "not real" and "not famous enough" person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Jow (talk • contribs) 18:54, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

This is Wikipedia. If you want to edit here then you must obey our policies. And frankly, you aren't important enough to be included on this encyclopedia. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

And if you continue creating the page then you will most likely be blocked for disruptive behavior.

Just as I thought, couldn't even take 10 seconds to respond. If you would leave the page up you might learn a thing or two. You have no right to judge me, and if you feel that me trying to make use of your website the way it was created to be is disruptive then that is your choice. You have still yet to give me one good reason other than "you are not important enough" which is a matter of opinion. I don't know where you went to school, but encyclopedias are not bias and you sir, are bias and prejudice. I ask you again for a real answer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Don Jow (talk • contribs) 19:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but a Google search returned only 505 results, and most of them are probably other people with the same name. Also if you take the time to actually read our policy pages you might understand a thing or two. The "links" mean citations from a published source. Can you find anything at all to cite about yourself? If you keep the autobiography stuff to your own namespace then nobody will care. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually as a matter of fact I did read it, long before obeying it. More than half of the "links" I used were from this website, and if that is not good enough for you then you should stop reading now and seriously think about your Terms. Perhaps if you looked at the page you would see that I do have "anything at all" to cite about myself. Personally I liked your hostile response better, it showed that you are actually human and your Terms are frustrating you almost as much as they frustrate me. Don Jow (talk) 19:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Erm. Please read WP:Citing sources and Citation. You obviously don't understand what a citation is. TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Um, you know, you really really aren't supposed to write about yourself, regardless of how notable you might be; see WP:Autobiography for details. (Of course, if someone else wrote one and somehow managed to establish your notability, I'm sure nobody would mind if you corrected the spelling of your dog's name, but other than that kind of thing ...) -- SamB (talk) 20:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Deleting List of real emo bands

You deleted "List of real emo bands" for an invalid reason. That page was not a duplicate of List of emo artists since the latter is done with absurd logic and looking at something very different. There's a reason the word "real" was added, as I was only putting bands rooted in hardcore. I spent hours finding about 70 bands that have a Wikipedia page already made on here and linking to them. Now I can't even recover it, let alone improve it, because you hastily deleted it for no good reason. I also had to recreate the talk page as you deleted that as I was typing my response to another user. Isn't the purpose of a talk page suppose to discuss things instead of just rapidly deleteing articles? Smk42 (talk) 22:11, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Look at the list. It's two completely different things. That poseur list essentially is "not real" emo bands. And I would have just merged mine into that one, but the problem is that article has a dictator that only allows the most absurd of edits to pass. He thinks a community college newspaper is a credible source, and clings to a site like allmusic.com that is notorious for errors. When you call him out on anything like that, he ignores it and runs away. He doesn't even respond on the talk page when you want to discuss the addition or deletion of a band. You can never get anything done with him around. Those dispute resolution procedures won't do crap. He was banned for a day too and weasled his way out of it. I've never had a problem with anyone else on here. I'm not the only one that sees his self-imposed dictatorship on certain topics. My solution to avoiding him was making new articles and ignoring his. The articles I created were done no differently from the countless articles already on this site. He purposely went after them because I made them. How is it my fault when you have someone that controls all the edits of an article and then doesn't let anyone else make their own as well? He's trying to run things here. Smk42 (talk) 22:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

It won't work because of the person we're dealing with. His ego is so big he refuses to acknowledge any wrongdoing or incorrect actions he has done. He selectively replies to the talk pages (if he replies at all), always avoiding the issues that would force him to admit what he's doing might not be the best way. Who in their right mind scours the net for one source to use instead of relying on consensus reports? To him, ONE article that says a band is emo is better than finding 10,000 that never make any mention of it regarding that band. That's what we have going on there, and that's why I had enough and made a better page for people that actually want to see what emo bands are on here. But you deleted it, wasting a few hours of my life. Can't I at least view that material again so I can paste it to Excel or something for myself? Thanks. Smk42 (talk) 22:54, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Political Promise

Hello mate,

I want to contest your decision to delete the page about my website. It has received critical acclaim from other blogs, which I can add to the Wiki entry in order to meet the standards of 'significance'. Political Promise is a highly influential website among politically active British young people, and I would really like to discuss further how we can go about getting the page back up to scratch.

Hope you are well, Charlie Edwards

Please e-mail me at charlieedwards001@yahoo.co.uk, rather than talk to me on here. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlieedwards (talk • contribs) 23:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

ZAP (motor company)

Hi. It looks likely to me that there is sockpuppetry going on at ZAP (motor company). I left a note on Jiachunhui's talk page, but then I got to thinking that the evidence might be considered to be pretty thin. Should I delete my comment? Or should I escalate this? Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 21:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! Ebikeguy (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

The ZAP insiders are editing fast and furious these days. I'm having a heckuva time massaging their insertions into encyclopedic format. If you have a chance, can you take a look and let me know if I left too much of their language in? Thanks. Ebikeguy (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again. Ebikeguy (talk) 00:27, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

One of the insiders messed up your infobox formatting. I can try to fix it, but I have not worked with infoboxes much. You might be able to fix it in a few key strokes. Ebikeguy (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I edited the intro for NPOV. Ebikeguy (talk) 19:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Your logic on the company name works for me, and your recent edits are great and much appreciated. Ebikeguy (talk) 19:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Curling

I added a reference from the official Olympics website which clearly states that curling is a game, not a sport. Can you stop vandalizing the page by reverting my edit? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacemoney (talk • contribs) 20:46, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Well if there's a contradiction on the site, why does 'sport' get to stay over 'game'? There's already been a discussion, and no sources. There's a definition of sport on the Wikipedia sport page, which curling doesn't fit.

But whatever, I'm not going to bother wasting my time arguing anymore, you might as well lock the page and keep the biased opinions in there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacemoney (talk • contribs) 17:17, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Jemima's Witnesses

Hey its been a long time since I've tried to add this page. I would really like it to appear on Wikipedia, but I guess I don't understand what I need to do or change to make this possible. Could you please explain the issues with creating a page for Jemima's Witnesses? I am going to post the link to our website so you can see for yourself, and if you visit the Facebook group listed here: http://sites.google.com/site/jemimaspeople you will see we have a small but growing following of people. Thanks for any help you can provide I just am very confused about the previous deletions of my entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dentalicious (talk • contribs) 07:08, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Galeano

Hi, yesterday I was looking for the article of Eduardo Galeano. I was not sure about his first name, so I searched Galeano and got this page. Then I tried to create a disambiguation page about it (please keep in mind that it would be a very expandable page because there are more pages here sharing that surname) but I was branded "unauthorized" (because I was editing as an IP, I guess). I spent some minutes following the so called "wizard" to eventually find it was useless (maybe I was just inept but I cannot avoid having the feeling it was otherwise). Then I saw I could leave a message in the talk page to request its creation and now I see you deleted it. The reason you gave in the summary (G8: Talk page of a deleted or non-existent page) makes me think you did not read the content of what I wrote, otherwise I find it quite puzzling and I would appreciate further explanation because I am not sure about why the deletion took place. Should I have created an account and edited the page with the disambiguation of those (or more) Galeanos, would have also been deleted? I ask this to avoid working innecessarily in case your answer is "yes". If "Galeano (disambiguation)" would not be deleted, would you undelete "Talk:Galeano (disambiguation)"?. Regards. --13:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.36.11.75 (talk)

If you had created an account, you wouldn't have had the problem. Users editing under an IP can not create new pages as you had properly guessed, though apparently you get an "authorized" wording instead of something a little more friendly. I did miss your comment entirely. I had blindly deleted the talk page without carefully reading it. My apologies for that. I went ahead and changed Galeano to your disambiguation request instead of creating an entirely new article and added in four additional names. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Gogo Dodo. Now I see that, as an IP, I probably could have done the same thing as you did, because it seems I can edit in Galeano with no problem but unfortunately that option did not occurred to me then. In order to keep certain history integrity probably it would be a good idea to restore the deleted edition of "Talk:Galeano (disambiguation)" and move it into "Talk:Galeano". Regards. -- 83.36.11.75 (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Good idea. Done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, Gogo Dodo. And this short explanation is a great idea, too. Great job. --- 83.36.11.75 (talk) 23:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyviol

I think that this article is a copyviol from here (and all the text is in spanish...). Can you control that, please? Thanks! --RoyFocker (talk) 18:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

why was my article deleted?

i feel frustrated and angry, do you think that you should delete my article (that needed some editing) because YOU find it with no importance, there for this is very frustrating and upsetting i want an explanation please. Give comments at http://kacems.weebly.com/ thx or thank you harmony's-letter essence —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harmonys-letter (talk • contribs) 03:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Auburn (singer)

I'm a hangon patroller, but not a sysop. After you protected Auburn (singer) someone recreated the article as Auburn(singer). It was subsequently A7 and (by me) G4 speedy nominated, but I've now confirmed that the artist in question has in fact hit the US top 100 charts (proof here), thus coming in under rule #2 at WP:BAND. I've declined both the speedy nominations and was in the process of moving it to Auburn (singer) when I discovered that you'd protected that page. Now that I know that the old article was protected, I don't like what happened (and wonder if the page creator might not be a sock to avoid the page protection), but on the basis of judging content, not editors, it appears to me that the article ought now to survive speedy deletion albeit not as Auburn(singer). Can I grit my teeth and respectfully request that you lift the protection of Auburn (singer) and move Auburn(singer) there? Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 20:26, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. All done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 21:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

veDrò

Hi Gogo Dodo, there is a post on veDrò's page: This article is an orphan, as few or no others articles link to it. veDrò is now link to two others articles, is it enough? Thank you Emafra (talk) 23:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Lilquawn

Kindly take a quick look at his page; do you think you should RevDel the phone number he posted? I'll remove it Seems someone else got there first, but I don't think that's a good thing to be posting (if you're wondering how I saw this, I'm the one who tagged the page the first time, and it showed up bold in the recent changes). The Blade of the Northern Lights (話す下さい) 04:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

As an aside, he also recreated Lilquawn again. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話す下さい) 04:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah, didn't see that. Jumped a bit too quick this time. Thanks for deleting it again. Sorry to disturb you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話す下さい) 04:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I didn't see the exchange above, but I did revdel it under RD5, since it could have been deleted under G11. —C.Fred (talk) 05:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Article: Taylor Long and recently deleted article

Hi,

I recently created an article under the title "Taylor long" with a lowercase "L".. when I noticed this I wanted the article deleted so I cleared the text and you responded with a quick delete.. very quickly. I shortly created a new article under the Title "Taylor Long" with the uppercase "L" in the last name. Now when I search in google under the name, the old article comes up in google search and when I click the link it says it's been deleted. How can I eliminate that article or existence of a prior article on that page completely from google? I would like only my new page to show up in searches, but so far the only way to access the "Taylor Long" page is by searching it in Wikipedia itself.

Please help?

Thanks! Taylor Long

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Absolute upsetting

Why wouldn't you CSD Best tourist destinations of pakistan? Sure, it's not a WP:CSD reason, but what's the point of having {{delete}} then? This is obvious WP:SNOW here and pure POV/ESSAY/OR rubbish. Most admins would delete this on sight. Why won't you? (I am watching this page, so please reply here.) — Timneu22 · talk 22:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I declined both CSDs because of exactly the reason you stated: WP:OR and WP:ESSAY are not valid CSD criteria. I declined the advertisement CSD tag because it is not blatant advertising either. While I agree that the AfD is likely to be closed as delete and probably even closed as WP:SNOW, trying to close the AfD early through CSD tagging will not work. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

That's bad adminship. My gosh, use WP:IAR for something obvious like this. Why are you guys so inconsistent? What's the point of having a {{delete}} template if it cannot be used? I have brought this to the attention of WT:CSD, again. These types of nonsense articles are getting tiring. — Timneu22 · talk 22:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to bring up my actions on WP:AN then. If you get the CSD criteria to include WP:ESSAY and WP:OR, then I would be happy to delete it. But until then, I won't be deleting it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

You didn't do anything wrong, so don't badger me with WP:AN. I can see by that statement that you take everything by the book. I guess you don't have the guts to use WP:IAR on something is horribly offensive to the encyclopedia's quality as this article. That's a shame. No replies needed, I'm no longer watching this page. — Timneu22 · talk 22:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

You're the one who called me a bad admin. And if you think I'm all by the book, well, that's your opinion, not mine. Calling the article "horribly offensive" is very over the top. I've seen "horribly offensive" and this isn't it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Well another admin got this right, deleting it about 19 minutes after you declined it (twice). They closed it as "unsalvageably unencyclopedic promotional essay". Imagine that. — Timneu22 · talk 10:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

WP:STICK, but if you insist, WP:ANI is that way. Feel free to bring up my action (or lack of action) in this case. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

SM City San Pablo, Inc

Please check out this thread on my talk page. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

He wanted his version of the article rather bad, but he just got blocked after attempting to create another fork of the article at SM City S a n P a b l o. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:18, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Jefferson Barracks Military Post#Plagiarism

Can I punt this one in your direction? I try to stay out of the back offices of WP, so I can't really offer much more help than I already have, but this might be of concern to TPTB and I'd like to see it handled by somebody better informed than me. If you'd rather not, which I understand, I'll tap somebody else. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 17:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

There was an OTRS ticket filed about the article, so I defer to the OTRS agent. The article has been blanked pending review. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I missed that edit. Thanks anyway. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

No worries. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Locking a Page

How do you lock a page? also, how do I make a header like yours?

--Muriness (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you --Muriness (talk) 10:09, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

hey : (

hey plzzzzzzzzzzzz can i advertize my channel on this page plzzzz why did u remove it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legitskilz (talk • contribs) 21:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Bishop Walsh Catholic School

I attend Bishop Walsh Catholic School, and David Ablett is a notable alumni, surely you don't know as you dont attend the school, I also have proof from the Birmingham mail. But it seems you're deleting everyone's entries, so there is no point of it being a public service! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gengeesekong (talk • contribs) 22:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

k

thanks for letting me know —Preceding unsigned comment added by MetalShark (talk • contribs) 23:41, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

tb

Hello, Gogo Dodo. You have new messages at Dank's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Dank (push to talk) 16:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Anthony Davis (basketball)

I have gotten help from you before over my articles being nominated for deletion so I was wondering if you could help with keeping Anthony Davis (basketball) from being deleted? There are multiple references involving him and I dont see why it got put up to be deleted. Ice (talk) 02:39, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. There should be more news on the lawsuit next week. That is when it is supposed to be filed. Ice (talk) 05:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you think the AfD for this article should be closed because I think either there is no consensous or it is to keep the article and no one has said anything on it in a few days. ¿Ice? (talk) 07:10, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Nope, it has not run its full seven days and it is not a snow closure. In fact, I just made a note in my calendar to address an issue as to why this subject should be deleted. All this was done prior to your post here and now. ----moreno oso (talk) 07:14, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Info-Experts.net

Sorry for "Info-Experts.net" . I hope next time will be You to create an article about this new website , when it be famous :D My intentions are just for good (like stackoverflow.com , experts-exchange.com , computerhope.com etc. etc.) The problem is "Is My Website" and it like as an ADVERTISEMENT. (I'm new in Wikipedia)

Bye! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aallkoci (talk • contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Regarding edit to Wendy's

First, thank you for the guidance. I did not intend any vandalism. Although, I was rather intimidated by the speed with which my mistaken edit was reversed (I switched the link with its caption). My first inclination was to refrain from further wiki edits altogether. I will try and use the "preview" button in future (using the sandbox seems rather unpractical). All the best. And thanks again. AlexBehrman (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Just browsed through all your wiki stars/ awards. Very impressive. Well done, and thanks! ;) AlexBehrman (talk) 07:17, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

My Article

In response to your deletion of my article covering the band Put Down Wednesday, I had thought up and listed a couple reasons explaining why my article should remain on Wikipedia (quoted from what I had added to the article):

"I, as an author of this article in collaboration with other residents of my household, have spent several days along with other individuals as we pooled together in an effort to preserve very important information about a new group of musicians from the most recent generation. I believe this article should be allowed to remain on Wikipedia for several good reasons. One reason is that this article will be continually updated and be used as a reference and source for information about these musicians throughout time in the near future, as this article will remain up-to-date and full of important points that others may need for future use (for example, a school project). Another simple reason is that since this article will be under constant watch and revision, the amount of information presented in this article will gradually increase. Put in other words, that statement basically means that although only a small amount information may seem to be available at present, I am absolutely positive that this article will blossom into a bountiful collection of information that will be very helpful to those who need access to it. Wikipedia is an astounding source of a staggering amount of information, and while having the ability to take part in adding to this collection is an amazing opportunity, I am also willing to make it my sole responsibility if necessary to provide the most accurate and up-to-date information possible about these individuals, their accomplishments, and their attributions to music. I would also like to add on another note that this content totally complies with Wikipedia's Terms of Use and does not violate any copyrighted material."

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Xeansen (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:12, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Derrick Favors

Do you know where I can go to report someone who keeps purposely messing with a page? The user's name is User:Derrickfavors, and surprisingly they keep messing with the Derrick Favors page. Thanks. ¿Ice? (talk) 17:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Ok Thank you. ¿Ice? (talk) 18:40, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

External Link - Nikola Tesla, Paul Revere, Samuel Adams, Joseph Warren

You removed an external link on each of these sites to character profiles of a book that I'm using in my classroom. The reason given for the removal was that it was historical fiction. The link was to character profiles though, not to some fictional listing, so I wanted to talk to you about this. I had looked up the External Links guidelines under What Should Be Linked and #3 applied:

3 - Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons.

The content of the site is not owned by me, and is copyrighted as indicated at the bottom of the page, so it cannot be integrated. The content presented in those links is certainly not fiction.

The reason for the addition is that my students will be using both this book and WP for a book report/research lesson, so the connection was important to show how information on the internet is connected.

Thank you

Woodrow123 (talk) 06:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Manny Machado

Sorry to bother you again but I created Manny Machado and it has been nominated for speedy deletion because the page has been deleted before, but since then he has signed a MLB contract and he meets WP:GNG. He was a very high pick in the 2010 MLB Draft. Is there anything I can do to prevent the page from being deleted? All the references have him as the main subject and he is covered nationally by the media. ¿Ice? (talk) 06:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

• (edit conflict)

You can also read the discussion on the recreated talkpage. He fails both WP:MLB/N and WP:GNG as "significant coverage" by "reliable sources" "independent of the subject" are not present. Criterias #6 and #7 of WP:MBL/N address these issues. Having not played a day at the highest level (either in the Olympics or MLB) causes him to fail both GNB and MLB/N. ----moreno oso (talk) 07:01, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

While he might not meet WP:MLB/N, him not playing a single game in the highest level does not make him fail WP:GNG. WP:GNG is "general notability". The question is if the coverage on him is "significant". Maybe, maybe not. I think that "reliable" and "independent" is not in question. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Can you help me with the deletion review since you know more about what it meets and fails and stuff like that? ¿Ice? (talk) 05:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

He hasn't replied to my message. ¿Ice? (talk) 05:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Whoops (S hocking)

Looks like I tagged it right as you deleted it, can you re-delete it? :) Mauler90 _talk 07:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Too late, I already deleted it! =D -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I saw that, man I am just one step behind you the whole way! Mauler90 _talk 07:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm fast with my mouse. =) Funny thing is that I deleted the same article a few hours ago. But I won't be deleting the article again. At least not for a few months. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah thats what I get for not plugging my mouse in (laptop). Mauler90 _talk 07:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Been there, but then my thumb starts to hurt and I remember fairly quickly after that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The President and her car.

Noted.Mick Vic (talk) 18:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Attack Page

To inform you of your mistake, that was not an attack page. The quotes on the page were direct quotes from a former Officer In Charge, in jest, in one of our never-ending discussions about Truth and Reality. The reason this page was created is because the individual in the article spends way too much time on Wikipedia. This lead to the idea of creating a page specifically for him, because it is a Marine Corps custom that when someone leaves the Marine Corps, or changes duty stations, that a lunch or dinner is thrown for them, and some sort of award is given. That award would have been the URL to the site, so that he could get a good laugh out of it, and always have something to brag about. As an individual that has completed a combat tour in Iraq, and has done quite a bit in his career, it is something out of the ordinary that he will be able to show off at his next duty station, where he will deploy to Afghanistan. So, in the interest of time, I'm asking that you not delete this page again, as we don't have the luxury of creating things over and over, and frankly, we have other duties that are more important than trying to convince Wikipedia to post an article. Jsweat123 (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Why are you removing the Silent Lane page?

Hi. Im curious why you removed the Silent Lane page that a few people are working so hard for. What is your intrest in doing that? Why shouldnt one of the most promising/upcoming band of sweden not be viewable here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrozenLynx (talk • contribs) 21:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:51, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Note

Hey there, Godo Dodo, edit filter 139 is doing the same thing. Although it is generating false positives... --Bsadowski1 06:36, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Me. No, you. Me. No, you.

Errr... one of us! You! Sorry, feeling kind of silly. Thanks for fixing that filter. I had made a functionally duplicate filter for that and wasn't aware that you were working on it. We were busy saving at the same time according to the log. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

I did make it work, but not until after I had broken it more and made it trigger on everything instead of nothing. :/ Having your filter catch them while I fixed the extremely stupid mistakes I made let me take my time and was very helpful, thank you very much for making it. Prodego ^talk 06:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Did you know?

You userpage is at the top of the list of pages with the most reverts. Not sure how you've managed to earn such a distinction amongst your many fans but.. why don't you just full-protect your userpage and be done with it? Or are you just starting to collect them now for fun? -- œ^™ 07:25, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

That's pretty funny. Yes, I was just collecting them for fun, but you're right, enough is enough. I think the ratio is so high because I don't exactly have the most thrilling user page here, so there isn't much to edit that isn't vandalism. Funny thing is that I'll probably be on the top for awhile since I'm still unlikely to edit my user page very often. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Changes on Hajj Page

Hello, I have put my presentation on the Hajj page and you have been taking it out. I would appreciate that you send me your comments if there is something in the presentation that you do not like - in other words the reason why you are taking the presentation out of the hajj page on wikipedia.

In all cases Wikipedia is a public domain and I would appreciate if do not remove the new material I am adding (Presentation on Hajj and Umrah).

Best Regards,

AT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbastaher (talk • contribs) 06:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Supreme Ruler Cold War

I'm not sure how to nominate pages for deletion but I'm sure you do. I think Supreme Ruler Cold War should be deleted because there are no references and hardly any info. -- Ice (talk) 03:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

I think I did it right. Never mind, unless I did it wrong. -- Ice (talk) 03:42, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:24, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I said what you said on it. We will see what happens. -- Ice (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Bots

How can I make a wikipedia bot?

&Muriness (talk) 13:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)&

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Gogo Dodo

Is DELETE your favorite button? Mishangelika (talk) 20:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Canal 3 Quimistan

I think Canal 3 Quimistan qualifies for speedy deletion, but I dont know what template to put on the page. The page hardly has any information. Any suggestions? -- Ice (talk) 06:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Please see here. I have suggested PROD or AFD. It could possibly qualify for A7 now, though… Airplaneman ✈ 06:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

MegaSearches

Hi Gogo Dodo, Please note that thne article "MegaSearches" is a meta search engine. Is is possible to udelete it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Takapoisa2002 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of TopHotels4U.com page

Hello, I received a message regarding the deletion of TopHotels4U.com page and was wandering why, since there are many such pages in Wikipedia (for example, TravBuddy.com) and as far as I checked it didn't violate any guidelines. Please let me know how can I return the page and update it with new information.

Thank you, Avios —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avios (talk • contribs) 19:32, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:13, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

I saw that you're in the Edit filter manager group.

So I was wondering if you'd comment on my request to join the Edit filter manager group, please? I really hope that you'll comment. :) Endofskull (talk) 00:39, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Jeevarajan wiki page deletion

Hi,

Please let me the reason for deleting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeevarajan page. I have created this biography page for our beloved maths teacher Mr.K.Jeevarajan. He is dead and tomorrow is his birth day. Tomorrow www.jeevarajan.com will be launched. I would like to have a wiki page for our beloved teacher. Thus I have created http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeevarajan page. But now it seem to deleted.

Please let me know that how can I protect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeevarajan page from deletion.

Thanks with regards kethees —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdkethees (talk • contribs) 05:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Please reconsider about the deletion of Jeevarajan page

I have created Jeevarajan page with the information based on following link. http://www.jeevarajan.com/index.php?mod=biography&act=default

Really, I would like to have Jeevarajan page. Please let me that how can I protect it from deletion.

Please do reconsider your deletion process on Jeevarajan page.

I have created the page in following link. I hope that it would be helpful to view the article about our beloved teacher Mr.K.Jeevarajan. User:Sdkethees/Jeevarajan

Sdkethees (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:30, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: the above, looks like it's just going to sit in userspace, and the person is not notable. I suggest prodding it per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTMEMORIAL. -- œ^™ 03:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it probably will sit in user space. Feel free to file an MfD on it. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

The Tell

HI, Gogo Dodo I have been trying to add The Tell to wikipedia since 2005. I am sorry if i'm slow when I am editing, but it takes me a long time to get all my words, and references together.

I'll get back to you —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcusLeDain (talk • contribs) 21:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hep C list

Gogo, thanks for your revert of List of people with hepatitis C. As an administrator, I'm sure you don't get enough kudos for simply doing the right thing. I'm not one myself, so I wasn't able to see exactly what your reverted, but I'm certain it was appropriate. As this list's main editor, I'm especially sensitive to this kind of edit to this article. Its very existence opens it up to it, so I appreciate the due diligence of admins like you. Keep up the good work! Christine (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied in kind, at same place. Christine (talk) 03:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Are videos good references?

I keep undoing different IP addresses edits on List of Deadliest Warrior Episodes because they keep trying to source something with a video. I told them they need to find an article or something that has the same info because I thought videos weren't reliable sources, or am I wrong? -- Ice (talk) 23:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Lately it has basically been the IP 67.247.143.113 that is adding the video or adding no source for the same thing. I left them a message on their talkpage but they keep doing it. -- Ice (talk) 02:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Gogo Dodo, we need your help!

Some lunatic has been messing with the Survivor Nicaragua character chart. This vandal has been typing in things like "Sofia Suarez". Help! Respond here or my talk page. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 19:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC))

I semi-protected the article for a week, which should stop that nonsense for awhile. Unfortunately, vandalism of some sort seems normal for Survivor articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. (RealityShowsRock (talk) 12:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC))

hello

hey buddy, i can understand if you dont accept me on here .. but why not my company moviebiz films? im an official theatrical movie company like others? they are also on here, why is that removed? please let me know .. thanks, jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayefswiss (talk • contribs) 07:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

hey gogo dodo i added the moviebiz films which you deleted ... its not an person or organisation its a real distribution company which is releasing movies in swiss cinemas. www.moviebizfilms.com i dont think i violated A7 ... why?? please help me out on this one. thanks, jay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayefswiss (talk • contribs) 00:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

In context of MTS India

Hi Gogo dodo,

I appreciate you pointed out that I should not put any personal view on any company in Wiki violating some clause. I would like to understand why your statement is contradictory. As you can allow a company to put false information and also providing there positives while hiding there negatives. It breaches the ethical code and can be considered as misleading consumers. If you want to put up a neutral point of view it should project both the positives and the negatives at the same time.

So would like suggest if you update any document mention both the views positive and negative points and let the user decide. And if you cant then don’t bother to destroy what a user tried to communicate to stop other users to be misled.

You will be astonished that I took the service more than a week and I am still notable to use it. And no one from the company bothers to respond to my query rather any buddies queries, the user may call them 100 of times but there response is we will ask our technician to call you up in 10hrs or maximum 24 working hrs. If you check the link below you can see it yourself.

http://www.consumercomplaints.in/?search=MTS

Regards Benrojer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.110.70.55 (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi.

Thank you for the info. There was a note on wiki next to the "proposed for deletion" alert to undo if in disagreement. There are reliable sources of notability. Can you help to clear up any issues that may be present on this article to prevent it from being deleted? Thanks for your help.

Scott Cruz management. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottCruz (talk • contribs) 18:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Looks like Scott Cruz is a promotional bio by an SPA rather than an autobiography. --UncleDouggie (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This is regarding User:Lamcph6. See User:Lamcph6 making constant disruptive edits to the Los Angeles and its related articles section.--Oakshade (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Necrosin

Why do you keep deleting my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedmetalxx (talk • contribs) 05:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Rangeblock question

Could you do rangeblocks on anonymous IPs? If you could, could impose a rangeblock on 202.70.54.0/24? Addresses on this range were/are being used by the notorious Indonesian vandal who puts misinformation on various articles related to (among many things) Digimon, telenovelas, and recently Little League. Recently, one of his misinformation targets is List of Little League World Series Championship Game broadcasters, again using addresses from the above range that I mentioned (i. e. 202.70.54.168, 202.70.54.178, 202.70.54.62, and 202.70.54.78). Thanks in advance! - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 06:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

I can give a list of addresses that he ever used from this range alone. I've listed them in my userspace for the record. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 06:14, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Here's the list I'm talking about, all of which he used on the vandal used in the last year and a half alone.

• 202.70.54.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.174 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.178 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
• 202.70.54.168 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

He also used addresses on the 202.70.50.*, 202.70.58.*, and 202.70.59.* ranges. I may list them, too, if you want. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 06:26, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Curaspan Health Group

Gogo Dodo - thanks for moving my article back to my user page.

Can you take the earlier move reasons off the Curaspan Health Group page? I mentioned the reason for moving was because of getting pinged for buzzwords and sounding like an advertisement and I would rather that not be public.

Thanks.

Dan DanMiller236 (talk) 21:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Good work on categorizing the Grundle2600 sockpuppets.

The following blocked accounts also need to be categorized as sockpuppets of banned user User:Grundle2600. Thanks.

• User:A small matter of pygmies
• User:Chin Ho Kelly
• User:Fastest with the Mostest
• User:Five dollar milkshake
• User:Holy Haleakala
• User:Lisa's Substitute
• User:Load of rich creamery butter
• User:Lucy McGillicuddy
• User:Maharincess of Franistan
• User:The days are dull the nights are long
• User:Vitameatavegamin
• User:Zis is KAOS, ve don't...

71.182.189.96 (talk) 23:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

The Rojob

Hello my name is Rowan and as you may have guessed I'm the one that's been trying to post the Rojob page that you keep deleting. If your deleting the page because you think it's a joke I'd like to point that just because only a small group of people use the term doesn't make it any less valid and also Wikipedia includes pages on the wedgie and daking so just because it's a stupid act doesn't make it any less real. I fail to see how it's offensive to anyone and it's an obscure term that the vast majority of people are unlikely to look up anyway. this term is already floating around Myspace, Facebook and urban dictionary so its spread to at least a hundred people and I have searched around and been unable to find an alternative name to the act in question so i feel I have the right to name it. Thank you for reading my message if you still continue to block it please send me a reply explaining why. please allow this page to go up. Thank you for your time Gogo Dodo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lachlan1991 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:30, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the troll on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Your welcome :). Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 04:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

births

Wikipedia:RY M4pnt (talk) 05:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

no problem, I didn't know either when added all the people I wanted. We all learn. M4pnt (talk) 05:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

İbrahim Tatlıses

Just for your information,

Re. [3], please look at Talk:İbrahim_Tatlıses#Edit request from 79.136.60.122, 5 September 2010. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  19:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

can you please let me post a biogrophy about myself

XXTheSpoonm4nXxXXTheSpoonm4nXx (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

i just started to write a bio of myself but i had to save it so i could go to a fire call. i am xXTheSpoonm4nXx i give permision for you to put up the article. please put the article backup. thanks

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for getting rid of the vandalism on my user page. When they start doing that, you know you're doing something right. :) ~~ Hi878 ^{(Come shout at me!)} 23:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:16, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Ila kumar

I'm a little stumped here . . . is Ila kumar notable? I'm seeing a potential AfD (at least a COI?) but I'm not too sure. -WarthogDemon 00:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Deleted

Why was my page deleted I was in the middle of editing? UserUknown (talk) 23:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)UserUnknown 9/7/10

Permission

The bio was not created about me. I am going to recreate it do I have permission? I am positive it will have many more pages. UserUknown (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I received your message regarding a charted single or album for Dequan Henderson. Can he instead be listed based on his acting performances in Disappearing Acts, Crown Heights, and Law and Order? UserUknown (talk) 02:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

User Warnings

When adding a warning template to a user page, it is advisable that you follow the following protocols:

1. Use sequential warnings (ie. don't skip right to level four after three violations)
2. Ensure warnings are appropriate
3. Use Level 4 IM (only warning) only in the most severe cases of vandalism, or when and editor resumes vandalizing soon after release of a block.

Sorry for the nitpicking, but we can't get a vandal blocked unless four warnings are issued and the vandal continues, it's a lot like police work, the vandals can get off on a technicality if we don't nitpick.

Ronk01 talk 00:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Deleting WESTFIELD FAMILY KARATE

Hey Gogo Dodo, DO NOT DELETE WESTFIELD FAMILY KARATE AS A WIKIPEDIA PAGE!!!! LEAVE IT ON THERE!!! OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecoler (talk • contribs) 19:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Estimated Towels

Someone else recreated the article. Sock? --Confession0791 (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

A.M. Naik page on wikipedia

I had added matter from Mr. A.M. Naik's profile. We felt that the content that is on wikipedia is incomplete. I am from Corporate Communications of Larsen & Toubro Limited, India. Mr. A.M. Naik is the Chairman & CMD of Larsen & Toubro Limited.

I had taken the matter from Mr. A.M. Naik's official profile and the entry done by us has been deleted.

Request you to retain the same.

Regards,

Lawrence Mohan Corporate Communications Dept. Larsen & Toubro Limited 2nd Floor, L&T House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai 400 001, India Tel (dir): 0091 2267525813; (Board) 67525656, Ext: 813; Mobile: 0091 9820522834 Email: lm-ccd@lth.ltindia.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lntccdpr (talk • contribs) 09:08, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Clark Schierle

Howdy, despite the autobiographical nature of this work I do feel (I know, that doesn't mean much) that I am "notable". Certainly as notable as Kenneth Kim my classmate, colleague of several years, whose Wikipedia entry I modeled mine after.

In addition to being a garden variety plastic surgeon like him, I was also one of the youngest people ever to attend UCLA (at age 12) and have received as many, if not more, accolades, awards, and have more publications.

That said, I respectfully understand that I may have violated some rules of Wikipedia by posting myself. Is there any way, under any circumstances that I can make my biography more palatable to the Wiki editing community?

If not, I will respect your decision. If it is merely a matter citing more stories from the lay press about me for notability, I can scan those in pretty readily.

Thanks!

Clark Schierle, MD, PhD Northwestern Plastic Surgery Associates, S.C. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkschierle (talk • contribs) 14:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Ah... fair enough, I can several articles from the lay press that are "about" me rather than "by" me to establish notability. Thanks for the clarification. I assume I make the changes on my "Userfied" page? Should I notify you to evaluate if they are adequate?

Thanks for your help,

Clark —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkschierle (talk • contribs) 21:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:38, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Why did you deleat my page I need help

Yes I am trying to add my information to wikipedia. I have created a standard land valuation teck and am currently the number one search on google; however, I can not seam to get added to your site. I am sure it is somthing simple that I am doing wrong so I was wondering if you could help me? Here was the content that I was trying to add below. Here is my email if it is easier terry@gomerritt.com thank you and have a great weekend.

Terry Purdy

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I want to add my company profile on wikipedia but i am unable to do that

Hi Admin,

i want to add my company profile on wikipedia but iam unable, i know it is company but i have seen so many company are already listed on wikipedia why should i not.

i tere is specific guide line to do that then provide us. if not thent please delete all the history as it should not shown in google search.

Thanks

gaurav Sharma +919999788451 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravsharmataj (talk • contribs) 15:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Louis Riel School

Why did you delete the the Louis Riel school page why can' you let us have fun? It's not like anyone outside of the school should care —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.139.86 (talk) 00:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

I didn't delete it, but I did move it to the correct naming convention on Wikipedia. Vandalism of school pages is not tolerated. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

please

please dont delete my page please what have I done —Preceding unsigned comment added by RochelleT2010 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

dont delete my page —Preceding unsigned comment added by RochelleT2010 (talk • contribs) 05:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

San Esperito

Why did you delete info on my country?

It was to entertain people with ideas it was a very humorous joke that was the point of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matteo20 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

biographies of living persons

Hi

I trying to do a "biographies of living persons" on myself as actor. It removed was by your editers?

Why I ask?

Do I need to remove the names of persons in the story from the writing?

Cheers Mick username: officermick68 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Officermick68 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Putney Student Travel

Hi. I recreated this article using the article wizard and included an assertion of notability and a cite to substantial coverage in the New York Times. Can you explain why you speedy deleted it? It's a very well known travel company in the United States serving a specialized market and is alomst 60 years old. There are plenty of sources on Google News and Google Books and the family that runs the business includes the governor of Vermont. Jeeper72 (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Question about deletion of Spring Web Flow Tutorial

Hi Gogo Dodo, I created an account just so I could ask you about the deletion of the Spring Web Flow Tutorial. As someone who so far is just a user of Wikipedia, I haven't given much thought to the rules about what is appropriate for Wikipedia. I certainly haven't noticed any tutorials here. However I was Googling for a Spring Web Flow Tutorial and was disappointed that the link led to a deleted page. Is the Spring Web Flow Tutorial somewhere else, instead of in Wikipedia? I haven't been able to find a good tutorial on that subject and sure could use one. Please, any suggestions?

Also, now that I have an account, who knows, I might edit something some time. Any suggestions for a newbie? Thanks! Jeaniac Jeaniac (talk) 00:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for the tips. How disappointing that there wasn't really a tutorial! I looked on the Spring web site first and didn't find a good tutorial there either. I love Wikipedia, and perhaps I will contribute someday in my areas of interest.Jeaniac (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

hello Gogo Dodo

I wonder if it is possably to get a copy of my old articke "what do you call a female/male dragon". I setting up an Wiki page about this and other info about dragons. I have suport of other writers.N o I'm not going to drag it up here again.
Thanks RealBigSwede (talk) 00:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Please Dont Delete the page about Billz he is a major star all over the world im not just saying that either

Can you like help me fix up my Article because i really want his Article out their and for people to know him better he also has fans in La and Trindad he is big please sir HELP!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abillzondeck (talk • contribs) 05:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Since your account has been blocked, I will answer you here. The article was deleted multiple times because he does not meet the notability guidelines for musicians. You say he is "a major star all over the world", but that is very unlikely since your articles states that he hasn't even released his debut album yet. Perhaps some time in the future when the album is released, it will be a hit and then he will become "a major star", but at this time, he isn't. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

MerchantCircle

Long soapbox comment collapsed

To bad you do not realize the truth that I posted was information from the BBB and should allow autheticated truthful posts about Merchantcircle.com instead be a Dodo. However just Google Merchant Circle are rip off and see the people this company has ripped off. However here are a few posts from the BBB website. By the way if you visit this link http://www.trustlink.org/Reviews/MerchantCircle-206051062 you will the truth about Merchantcirlce.com. But what is your reason for allowing crooks to post lies on Wikipedia? Please tell my you call the truth vandalism, do you work for Merchantcircle.com? LOTS of talk floating around about class action lawsuits against Merchant Circle. I think the sooner Merchant Circle is out of business, the better. The are clearly basically street-punk criminals. One person wrote this review: "July 19th, 2010 at 10:07 am This is ridiculous. Here is a company that has already been sued, has over 200 complaints registed with the BBB and hides behind an endless circle of phone prompts. Not only do they have my buisiness listed without any authorization from me, but they have the wrong address, location photo and a negative review posted by someone who isnt even one of our customers. Im willing to intitiate a class action suit if anyone wants to get involved. If so, please email me at rmusk@msn.com. It time for this company to go." link: http://www.techsoapbox.com/merchantcircle-we-love-the-scum/ MerchantCircle is Complete garbage... They list sites with out concent, post private information without autorization. There are hundreds of business owners complaining of false representation by this company/wensite. why are they still around? And why is their business standing on here an A? I work for an advertising agency and continually am asked to remove listings from this site instead of advertising on it. There is no support what so ever and removal from their listings seems to be impossible. I believe a class action lawsuit is in order. This is ridiculous. Here is a company that has already been sued, has over 200 complaints registed with the BBB and hides behind an endless circle of phone prompts. Not only do they have my buisiness listed without any authorization from me, but they have the wrong address, location photo and a negative review posted by someone who isnt even one of our customers. In order to have my business listing removed I have to subscribe to thier service or take time to complete and fax a document to them. The only way to talk with a CSR direct is to use a 900 number at a charge of $35.00. It is wrong that I should have to pay to have misinformation removed from the web. Based on what I have read, it is clear that this company uses deceptive practices to enhance thier subscriber base and create fee based revenues. A class action lawsuit is in order. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCourtoflastresort (talk • contribs) 07:29, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey

Hey - hopefully Dr. Mukesh's case is over but now I need your admin help on another issue. I have to report AyanP (talk · contribs) for his incivil manner and edit warring on Katrina Kaif. He first reverted me with an edit summary which was incivil. I warned him not start an edit war and not use inappropriate language. On the article, I cited a source for the claim that she is a British Indian. His reply was very rude. He said "I will start an edit war if you make improper edits", again attacked me personally and reverted me despite the source. I warned him once again, his reply was again very rude and he now seems to be reverting me continuously despite the source and despite being warned. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

The problem is that he is not willing to discuss. I cited a reliable source but he keeps reverting me and using incivil language, which is unacceptable without considering the dispute itself. More importantly, his next revert will be in violation of WP:3RR, so I would request you to take admin action in this case. I started a talk page discussion and notified him about that. I also warned him about the 3RR thing. Shahid • ^Talk2me 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I warned him not to start an edit war and he in return said he would. I cited a source, and he still reverted me. I now warned him again and asked him to discuss on the talk page rather than revert sourced information (BTW, this version was accepted by another user with whom I discussed the matter). Let's see if he gets it because I cannot and actually do not want to fight with someone who does not try to collaborate. I'm actually not going to revert him again because I'm well aware of rules, that's why I let you know of the situation. Thanks for your time. Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:22, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

barney bunch

hello, I made an article about the barney bunch, a web phenomena about barney, drew pickles, ronald mcdonald, and many other cartoon characters. This is a real phenomena, and as such, I demand my article be added back, or at least an article for the barney bunch. They are an unofficial organization, and as such proof of the barney bunch is rare, but many videos and other web content, and this website is my source, but you can see the effects of the barney bunch all over youtube. barney bunch website click here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiakosan (talk • contribs) 00:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

w.s.w.b

i have made 3 pages about the west side white boys and all 3 have been deleted and i would like to know why that is?????? message me back!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by W.s.w.bz (talk • contribs) 02:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The purpose of the various notices left on your talk page was to inform you of the reasons for deletion. Have you read the notices and the links in them?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:21, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Ranjith

Can you please redirect the deleted article Ranjith to Renjith? The former is an alternate spelling for the later, so I guess both can point to the same page. The page is now protected, and so I am unable to do this myself. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. I will create the disambiguation page as you pointed out. Thanks for letting me know that there are more articles which has Ranjith as the first name or last. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

What can I do to keep the Cfo wise wikipedia page from being deleted that you just removed?

Dannygard (talk) 21:29, 22 September 2010 (UTC)dannygard

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

godzilla

why cant i post on the godzilla page? when im just trying to put up new info and credit stuff taken from my essay? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corradiforever (talk • contribs) 23:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I am not able to write on the godzilla page and i dont understand.... it makes no since

corradiforeverCorradiforever (talk) 00:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Since your account has been blocked, I will answer you here. Your edits were undone or reverted because you were repeatedly attempted to add in your own name to the article in inappropriate places which is disruptive. You provided no source for any of your later claims about the 2012 movie. You claim to have written an essay about the movie, but your essay is not likely to be a reliable source. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

NBA 2K

There is an edit war on the article NBA 2K where an IP 67.216.243.127 is continuously removing the Image:NBA 2K11 screenshot.jpg‎. Can you please intervene? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

About NBA 2K

I re added the screenshot of NBA 2K11 on NBA 2K because there's nothing wrong with a picture of the NBA 2K11 scrrenshot on the NBA 2K article. Wayne Olajuwon chat 02:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

The user also created ChineseTones, which is about the same. Netalarm^talk 07:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Question about a deleted page, maybe want to (re)create one.

Hi Gogo Dodo,

Great work u do I see, wy is there no article about "Pzychobitch" anymore? Im a bit new to Wikipedia and I was looking for more info about her. Oke, al official and non official websites only show me release dates of cd's till 2006 and you removed her page in 2006. Her name is "Sina Hübner" as far as I know.

My question number 1 is, What happend to her and 2 wy delete a complete wikipedia entry?

Dont get me wrong, you may have a very good reason for it, I just cant find anymore about her. Great thank you in advance for taking time on reading this and have a very nice day.

CodeAsm

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Message from Thechopster

Yo! What up home dog? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thechopster (talk • contribs) 02:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Wish to become an Admin

Hey Gogo Dodo, I would like to apply for adminship and I don't know where to start. Could you help me?

Thanks, Petri152 Petri152 (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry about vandalising a few articles. If you let me vandalize one more (because I've thought of a really witty one) then I promise I won't vandalize wikipedia again. Deal? Tutubabyiknow (talk) 04:49, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Page Deletion for Venom vicious

I am asking for you to restore the page for Venom vicious. I am sorry for rushing on creating the page. I will add more information to it. Okay? The page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Afro55/Venom_vicious Talk to you next time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.52.131.22 (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

You may recreate the article in main space if you can establish that he meets the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. As the article is written now in that user space draft, it does not appear that he meets those guidelines as his album or a single from that album did not chart nationally, nor are there any reviews of the album, or coverage from reliable sources about him. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, I don't want to write the article in the main space just yet. I only want to work on the article in my user space. Can you just restore the user space please. I will continue to work on the user space and add the notability guidelines later. Send me a message back please. Im not worried about doing the main article right now. I just need to restore the user one to the google page. Afro55 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afro55 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)