Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Figure Skating/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

→

Archive 10

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Vectorized image

The file File:Special_figures.png can be replaced by File:Special_figures.svg. Newly created!

--Saippuakauppias ⇄ 06:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Short Program

FYI Talk:Short Program lists a requested move for renaming the article. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

CFD

Category:Figure skaters by century and subcats have been nominated for deletion/upmerging. Kolindigo (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

A question about merging

I'm not a member of this wikiproject, and I'm sure this has been discussed before, but is there precedent for merging the pages of two pairs/ice dancing skaters? I ask because I was reading through the pages for Scott Moir and Tessa Virtue, and other than the personal life sections they are pretty much exactly the same. It would be much more efficient to merge the two, and I was wondering if anyone from this project would object if I proposed a merge of the two pages. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 04:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

They are notable as individuals, so there's no need to merge the articles. Kolindigo (talk) 04:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I'm not saying they aren't both notable. I'm saying two identical pages is inefficient and unnecessary duplication. There is precedent for having the pages of two notable individuals merged, for example, Coen brothers or Wright brothers. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 04:57, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

But skaters can have more than one partner and more than one notable partnership. For Virtue/Moir, that's currently not the case, but for many skaters, we'd have bios split up across many articles. It's inefficient and confusing. Yes, there's duplication, but there's no guarantee that Virtue (for example) won't retire and Moir team up with someone else, or for that to happen with any notable partnership. It's better to have an article for each individual and then, if, say, Craig Buntin ends his partnership with Valérie Marcoux and teams up with Meagan Duhamel, we don't have details about Buntin's career spread out across many articles. As far as the articles seeming identical, they can be made more distinct by editors contributing and expanding them. Kolindigo (talk) 05:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

But I'm not saying every pair's article should be merged, I just think it should be considered in this case. And if a merge happens and they go their seperate ways and get new partners, there is a similar solution: unmerge the articles. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 05:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

A merge would destroy the page history and throw everything out of whack if it was necessary to unmerge them. I don't see what the difficulty is in having two separate articles. I don't see that there's anything broken here that needs fixing. Kolindigo (talk) 05:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

• Proposal makes sense, because the articles usually overlap, but skaters have short career in sport and do not always spend the rest of their live together. -- deerstop. 22:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Twizzle

I've never heard of this at all, let alone in a track and field or pole vault application as the article says. All I'm getting is things related to Figure skating. I'm a complete novice when it comes to these things: is this a particular move in figure skating? If not, then this is probably an article to delete. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 22:42, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

As article creator of Twizzle (running), I don't oppose deletion of the article; as you can see from a previous edit summary, I split that information off from Twizzle because it didn't belong there, and I don't actually care what happens to Twizzle (running). As far as the figure skating element is concerned, as the article says, it is a required element in ice dancing. As well, many skaters do them as part of step sequences. Kolindigo (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Silly me. Didn't actually read the main twizzle article! In that case I'll suggest it for deletion. If this is a real running term, then it is one used so infrequently as not to merit an article. Cheers! (Hope you guys enjoyed working on the figure skating side of the Winter Olympics!) Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{Join WikiProject Athletics!} 10:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced living people articles bot

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Archive 6/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Archive 6/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.

There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.

If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 01:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Figure Skating Notability: WP:NSPORT

On the talk page on WP:NSPORT there is a proposal to limit figure skaters notability. Please comment, as WP:NSPORT is going through a change that may lead to it becoming guideline. The comment is that the figure skating clause seems to be much more lenient when compared to other Olympic sports MATThematical (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Sports Notability

There is discussion ongoing at Wikipedia_talk:BIO#RFC:_WP:Athlete_Professional_Clause_Needs_Improvement debating possible changes to the WP:ATHLETE notability guideline. As a result, some have suggested using WP:NSPORT as an eventual replacement for WP:ATHLETE. Editing has begun at WP:NSPORT, please participate to help refine the notability guideline for the sports covered by this wikiproject. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 03:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Managing issues of print-journal plagiarism in re Eugene Turner

I've brought this up on Kolindigo's talk page, but she's probably off having an undoubtedly much-deserved life at the moment.

Briefly: an obituary for Eugene Turner appeared in a recent issue of Professional Skater. To readers coming to the WP article directly from the magazine pages (as well they might, seeking yet more information about him), it might appear that Wikipedia has plagiarized the obit. In fact, it's the other way around: the obit plagiarizes Wikipedia. Some details at the link [1], more details forthcoming (copy of journal page, links) if anybody is interested in figuring out what to do with the WP article, given the potential here for misunderstanding. Yakushima (talk) 07:02, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I've added an image clipped from a PDF including a scan of the PS Journal obit, which was attached to an e-mail that was received from an employee of PSA some time around March 31st, then forwarded to me weeks later. It's possible that there is attribution of some kind on the following page -- I don't have a copy of the magazine yet, so I can't tell you.

The first part of the obit is, except for the opening paragraph, copied verbatim from article Eugene Turner just before his death on Jan 14.[2] The last line is also identical to the last line of the WP bio. Most of the second half is verbatim from Virgina Vale's 1982 "History of the Los Angeles Figure Skating Club" [3], which in some (not very cleanly edited) form is available at the LAFSC website via a link on the WP bio. I've since verified via the Wayback Machine that there's no chance of this PS Journal obit having been copied to the LAFSC website -- Vale's essay shows up in its present form back in August 2007.[4]

I was baffled by the problem of how to describe the "Non-free fair use" of this image, finally settling on "Non-free fair use newspaper image". It contains text that's arguably copyright Virginia Vale, though she's deceased, so perhaps rights revert to LAFSC; the article first appeared in one of their newsletters. It also contains text taken verbatim from Wikipedia. However, since the image is not for an article and never will be, I guess it's a non-issue.

What is the issue? The current version 15:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC) still looks like it's copying PS Journal, not the other way around; as readers of that journal arrive at the WP bio, they'll tend to assume it's copying what they just read in PS Journal. What do we do? Re-write? Post a notice? Is there a generic notice template for this? If not, should there be? Yakushima (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

The appropriate template to use is {{Backwardscopyvio}}. I have added a barebones version of it to the article's talk page, but if you have more details (author, publisher, date), you can add them too. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons

The WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons (UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope. There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 35,715 as of May 1. A bot is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both Category:All unreferenced BLPs and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

Your Project's list can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Figure Skating/Unreferenced BLPs. Currently you have approximately 113 articles to be referenced. Other project lists can be found at User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects/Templates and User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects.

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at WT:URBLP or at my talk page. Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Possible WikiProject rename to include Speedskating?

I'm not a member to this WikiProject, but I was thinking since many/most Figure Skating events are under the jurisdiction of the International Skating Union, it would be possible to include Speedskating (long-track, short-short) into this project's scope (the ISU runs speedskating events as well)? There are many speedskating-related articles that could use a Wikiproject behind them to support them... and if this were possible, perhaps this WikiProject could be renamed to WikiProject Ice Skating to include them? Good/bad idea? Thanks, oncamera^(t) 17:05, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

I disapprove the idea, because many figure skating fans know absolutely nothing about speedskating, speedskating is a whole other world. -- deerstop. 18:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I suppose that could be true, but that doesn't really seem a reason to disapprove. :) The International Skating Union handles both sports reasonably well, no? A WikiProject could do the same. (BTW, Speedskating is basically racing-on-ice.) oncamera^(t) 00:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I know what speedskating is. :) But merging projects will automatically turn all participants of Figure Skating WikiProject into the participants of both Figure Skating and Speedskating projects. Which I disapprove, because IMHO a person involved in any project should write and edit articles on this particular topic, and how will we do that if we have no interest in speedskating? -- deerstop. 16:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, I think you mean "I have no interest in speedskating" as you can't speak for other participants in this project. A person here could edit figure skating articles and ignore the speed skating ones, and there might be editors interested in building the scope of speed skating, having it a defined project; no one is forced either way. Thanks for the input, oncamera^(t) 18:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sure, it was just mine (and mine alone) point of view. -- deerstop. 21:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

[dedent] I don't understand the organizing principle being invoked here, for having a merged project. Is it that the ISU governs both sports? If it's that speedskating is also a sport on ice, using skates, then why not hockey as well? I'd stick with the status quo. After all, if someone says, "I'm an ice skater", it's virtually synonymous with "I'm a figure skater." If you want a project as a home for articles about speedskating and speedskaters, it's hardly unreasonable to start your own. Yakushima (talk) 16:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Hans-Jürgen Bäumler photo

Pretty please! I need help with identification. Where exactly is Hans-Jürgen Bäumler on this picture? -- deerstop. 18:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

What is the 'Place' means?

in this article, I saw the 'place', and I want to know what does it mean. Sincerely.Realidad y Illusion (talk) 12:04, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

+ Also, what is the 'point' meaning in this article?Realidad y Illusion (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Figure skating articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Figure skating articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Sunday, November 14th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of November, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

If you have already provided feedback, we deeply appreciate it. For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 16:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject cleanup listing

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)