Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Volcanoes

(Redirected from Wikipedia talk:VOLC)
Latest comment: 5 days ago by Z1720 in topic Good article reassessment for Ben Nevis

kawah-ijen hydrochloric or sulphuric acid?

edit

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/01/140130-kawah-ijen-blue-flame-volcanoes-sulfur-indonesia-pictures/

Needed volcanoes and igneous landforms in North America!

edit

There are lots of these magmatic intrusions (that means volcanoes and igneous landforms) that need to be drafted and added to Wikipedia. In Lassen Volcanic National Park, I know we've got Lassen Peak, Chaos Crags, Mount Tehama, and a few other volcanoes in the area are Wikipedia-documented, but there are several cool volcanoes in the area, including stratovolcanoes, that need to be added. Like Latour Butte, Mount Harkness, Hat Mountain, several prominent peaks, Inskip Hill, Freaner Peak, and several other volcanoes across North America need to be added ASAP! Sorry if I sound in a rush, I just want Wikipedia to be even better than it currently is! Volcano]]User talk:TheEarlyVolcanologist2023 12 April 2023

Deliberately fraudulent article

edit

Please look at the page: Nodoroc

I am a geologist with the University of Georgua AND part of the family that owns the Nodoroc site. Whoever created this wiki entry is posting factually false information. This is a peat bog NOT a mud volcanon or volcano of any kind. Based on some of the references, I believe I know who might be responsible. He has let it be k iw to me before that he objects to professionals on the basis that we are professionals. Richard Thornton us widely a discredited name in the archeology field and he is in no way a geologist. I really don't have time to edit this whole site. It needs to be deleted. Please advise. GAgeologist (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

MallardTV, as the creator of the mentioned article, do you have anything to say to this? Volcanoguy 17:43, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dang it. I didn’t know. I’d assume that my sources are too misinformed. MallardTV (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am in no way associated with anyone whom you may assume responsible. I am merely an interested person that frequents Winder. I didn’t know this was factually incorrect and agree it should indeed be taken down. MallardTV (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Or if it would be appropriate since you did start the page, perhaps we could cooperate to edit the existing stem to make an informative page. It actually is a very important geological and cultural site, just not a volcano. 0 2600:1005:B0CE:C9DE:0:A:451F:1701 (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Practice of mountain vs volcano articles?

edit

I am no expert, but I found these entries on top of each other on a disambiguation page to be odd:

Is it common practice to have an article on the volcano and the mountain? If not, is a merge appropriate? Thanks, 2pou (talk) 21:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Both articles are covering the same topic and should be merged in my opinion. Volcanoguy 21:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've added merge templates on both articles. Volcanoguy 15:12, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

FAR for Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve

edit

I have nominated Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 01:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lowercasing of all tectonic plates discussed in a relisted RM

edit

A discussion of lowercasing the titles of all tectonic plates on Wikipedia was relisted at Talk:Eurasian Plate#Requested move 6 October 2024 a few days ago. Editors here may have an interest in participating before it closes. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Geyser

edit

Geyser has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:33, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Ben Nevis

edit

Ben Nevis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply