Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/November 18

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Howcheng in topic 2021 notes
Today's featured article for November 18, 2024
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 18, 2024
Picture of the day for November 18, 2024

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Poorly sourced and low quality articles edit

diff link = Please do not remove high quality WP:GA rated or WP:FA rated materials and replace it with poor quality, inadequately sourced low rated pages. -- Cirt (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

diff link = Articles Time zone and 1929 Grand Banks earthquake have multiple problems and unaddressed issues. Please, do not add these poor quality pages back to this Selected anniversaries page. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
diff link = Battle of Berlin (air) and Push-button telephone = these articles are poor quality and have multiple problems, and should not be displayed on the Main Page in their present states. They were added replacing high quality pages, Calvin and Hobbes and Aggie Bonfire. For the 3rd time, high quality pages were removed and replaced with poor quality pages. Talk page discussion, here, would be appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

See the bolded wording at page, Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/doc, which reads: "Please note that the events listed on the Main Page are chosen based more on relative article quality and to maintain a mix of topics, not based solely on how important or significant their subjects are.". (Bolding emphasis is in the original) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Poorly sourced entries have been added back, see diff link. These should not be added back to the page, hidden commented out or otherwise, until properly sourced. -- Cirt (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
No no no, they should stay hidden at least. Look at any other day's page; there are usually a number of hidden items that are noted as needing better citations or whatever. Then next year, when someone comes around to update the page, they can always check those articles to see if they've improved. This makes it more convenient for this editor, even if it's yourself -- now you don't need to go and do the research anymore. If the article is still in poor quality, then you leave it hidden. If it's improved, it can be moved back into the pool. But if you remove it, you just make more work for the updating editor. Get it? howcheng {chat} 01:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Respectfully disagree, we do not want to allow for the possibility of someone carelessly adding back poorly sourced entries or articles with tagged issues for display on the Main Page. However, you appear to be determined to repeatedly add back the poorly sourced entries, so it is not worth getting into a tiffy over. Hopefully the poorly sourced entries will not be displayed in the future until all issues have been appropriately fixed. -- Cirt (talk) 02:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Steamboat Willie edit

Removed this one. Multiple unaddressed issues, including WP:NOR violations, WP:V violations, and completely unreferenced chunks. -- Cirt (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

King's Cross fire edit

Removed this entry, as there are multiple unaddressed issues with the page, including significant sourcing concerns throughout the entire article. -- Cirt (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unam sanctam edit

Removed this entry, due to multiple unaddressed issues, including sourcing concerns - over-usage of primary sources and under-usage of secondary references, as well as referencing issues throughout the article page. -- Cirt (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Haakon VII of Norway edit

Removed this entry, due to sourcing concerns. Multiple unaddressed issues with this article. Large portions are unsourced. Entire sections of this page on a person have no references whatsoever. The article fails core Wikipedia policies, including WP:V. -- Cirt (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

2012 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 13:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 06:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

2014 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 08:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

2015 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 08:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

May I recommend the pictured one be changed to Calvin and Hobbes, seeing as it is its 30th anniversary and thus noteworthy? :-) Stolengood (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Alas, there are no public domain images of the comic strip. howcheng {chat} 07:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Damn. :-( Not even a free use? Stolengood (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

2016 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 07:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

2017 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 08:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

2018 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 02:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

2019 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 17:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

2020 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 05:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

2021 notes edit

howcheng {chat} 17:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)Reply