Wikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing/Assessment
WikiProject | |
Fisheries and Fishing | |
Main project | talk |
Assessment statistics | |
Traffic statistics | |
Articles | talk |
Proposals | talk |
Resources | talk |
Project subpages | |
Members | |
Requested fishing articles | talk |
Things you can do | |
To-do list | |
Assessment | |
Unassessed articles | |
Expand stub class articles | |
Other | |
Outreach | |
Newsletter | |
Recent updates | |
Featured/good articles | |
Categories | |
Templates | |
Articles for deletion | talk |
Subpages |
Welcome to the WikiProject Fishing Article Assessment pages!
StatisticsEdit
Fishing articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
GA | 1 | 5 | 14 | 9 | 29 | ||
B | 6 | 67 | 72 | 41 | 3 | 189 | |
C | 9 | 62 | 155 | 173 | 10 | 409 | |
Start | 4 | 82 | 401 | 466 | 100 | 1,053 | |
Stub | 8 | 122 | 335 | 69 | 534 | ||
List | 12 | 28 | 40 | ||||
Category | 268 | 268 | |||||
Disambig | 2 | 2 | |||||
File | 7 | 7 | |||||
Project | 9 | 9 | |||||
Redirect | 33 | 33 | |||||
Template | 34 | 34 | |||||
Other | 21 | 21 | |||||
Assessed | 20 | 226 | 777 | 1,052 | 374 | 182 | 2,631 |
Unassessed | 1 | 72 | 73 | ||||
Total | 20 | 226 | 777 | 1,053 | 374 | 254 | 2,704 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 10,736 | Ω = 4.84 |
FA |
A |
GA |
B |
Start |
Stub |
- Notes: The template that gives us these totals does not correctly link to Unassessed articles. As it is a shared template, we do not wish to change it. The link to find Unassessed articles is: Category:Unassessed Fishing articles. This box is updated automatically on an approximately weekly basis - it may not be the exact totals of assessment at this moment.
Version 1.0 Editorial TeamEdit
Using the Template Assessment ParametersEdit
The {{WPFISHING}} template also has variables to add in assessment data. You may use either of the following examples with the template:
{{WPFISHING|class=|importance=}}
or
{{WP:FISHING |class= |importance= }}
The arguments passed through the template are class and importance. They may be the following:
ClassEdit
- FA=Featured Article (See Below)
- A=A-Class
- GA=Good Article (See Below)
- B=B-Class
- Stub=Stub-Class
- Start=Start-Class
ImportanceEdit
- Top = Top Importance
- High = High Importance
- Mid = Middle Importance
- Low = Low Importance
- NB Generally, the Importance of an article is not related to the current Class of the article, nor its current state of editing. "Importance" refers to how the average person seeking knowledge on Fishing-related articles would recognize the article's importance to Fishing in general. For example, a species that is listed in the FAO Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics Yearbook as commercially fished should be ranked at least Mid.
- Example: If you wanted to rate an article as a Good Article of Middle Importance, the code is:
{{WP:FISHING|class=GA|importance=Mid}}
More information on assessments can be found at Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Team.
Adding RatingsEdit
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Fishing articles)
- Please note that FA-Class article designation means this is a Featured Article. Featured Articles are determined by the Featured Article Candidates process. Editors and Fishing assessment team members should not rate articles FA-Class, but rather propose articles to the Featured Article candidate process.
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Fishing articles)
- A-Class articles are at the pinnacle of Fishing Assessment team evaluation. An A-Class article may be one heading towards FA-status, or be better than B-Class but not obtained the GA or FA ratings from their respective evaluation teams.
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Fishing articles)
- Please note that GA-Class articles are Good Articles, determined by the Good Articles WikiProject team. GA-Class should not be assigned by editors or Fishing Assessment team members, but rather propose articles to
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Fishing articles)
- B-Class Fishing Articles are ones which possess more material that Start- or Stub- class articles, but need further polishing and work to bring them up to GA, A, or FA-Class status.
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Fishing articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Fishing articles)
- NA (adds articles to Category:Unassessed Fishing articles)
- This is used for either a) Places where the template exists outside of the Article Talk namespaces, or b) Rating has not yet been made by an editor or the Fishing Project Assessment Team. Not specifying the parameter defaults the rating Unassessed.
ExamplesEdit
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Fishing as of July 2007. |
GA | The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Fishery as of July 2007. |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Maggot as of July 2007. |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Spoonplug as of July 2007. |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018) |
Information on how to evaluate an article for class may be found at WP 1.0 Assessment Grading.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Fishing articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Fishing articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Fishing articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Fishing articles)
- Leaving parameter blank adds articles to Category:Unknown-importance Fishing articles
Assessment Drive CollaborationEdit
The Assessment Drive is on, beginning Monday, June 18, 2007! Ratings discussions on specific articles are located at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Fishing/Assessment/Drive. Come join us!
The Assessment TeamEdit
Membership on the Assessment Team is purely voluntary. You may add your name below, if you wish. Adding your name, however, is not necessary to assisting us in the assessment process.
- LaughingVulcan 01:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- themcman1 talk 09:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- --Mike Cline 15:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Bu b0y2007 07:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)