Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 May 7

Help desk
< May 6 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 7

edit

09:29, 7 May 2024 review of submission by Aswin012

edit

hii, i have created a article based on human resource management software now it has been removed from the review desk. what was the reason for the rejection Aswin012 (talk) 09:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aswin012 The draft is in your sandbox, so I fixed your post to link to it. Please examine the message left by the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:29, 7 May 2024 review of submission by Artem S. Tashkinov

edit
  • The translation layer which now supports over 20K Windows titles under Linux is not "noteworthy"?
  • A software title which made Linux an actual gaming platform?
  • It's extensively used by Intel in their Windows GPU driver!
  • Something which is sponsored and used by Valve Corporation to enable gaming on Steam Deck?

OK, then, screw it! It's not my issue that "esteemed" media doesn't want to write about it. It's sad but I'll just let it expire if no one volunteers to make this article WP-compliant. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 10:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the review comment "Sources almost certainly exist for this, but they need to be found and integrated" you have not done this yet despite a list of possible sources being provided. Theroadislong (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are no sources where DXVK is featured as the main topic. None. The links provided are only tangentially related to DXVK. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Artem S. Tashkinov: if you're disputing the AfC reviewer's assessment, you're free to move this into the main article space yourself, given that you have extended confirmed status (unless of course you have a COI?). New page patrol will then take a view on it instead (albeit that they implement the same guidelines).
If your issue is more fundamentally with Wikipedia's notability policies, then this is the wrong forum for that debate. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't want to dispute anything TBO. I'm tired of arguing and disputes, there's just too much of it. I have no COI, it's open source software. I've no idea how to move it into the main article, and even if I knew how, I'm afraid someone would speedily delete it for the same "being unworthy"/"lack of citations" reasons. In short, would be great if you took it from here. Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 14:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You use the "move" function to move the draft into the encyclopedia(it may be in a drop-down menu at the top). Yes, it's possible what you say could happen- which is the risk of moving it yourself against the advice of reviewers. This isn't the place to solicit someone to "take over" for you- if you want to see it in the encyclopedia, you need to do the work and be able to defend it. If that's not something you want to do(nothing wrong with that, this environment isn't for everyone), this is probably the end of the road for the draft unless someone else interested in this software finds it(possible but unlikely) and takes it up themselves. 331dot (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:51, 7 May 2024 review of submission by 103.197.204.25

edit

help me to make this article i have trouboling with references

103.197.204.25 (talk) 10:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you're Omagol, please remember to log in when editing.
There doesn't seem to be a problem with referencing, at least not in a technical sense; two citations have been successfully created (albeit to pretty useless sources). You probably have more of a problem with finding sources that would establish the subject's notability. No one can help you there, you should be citing the sources which have provided the information in the draft. What are they?
Or might you be writing about yourself, or an acquaintance? If so, see WP:AUTOBIO and WP:COI, respectively. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:55, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:42, 7 May 2024 review of submission by Azeilander

edit

Please tell me how I can edit this page to be more objective and less like an advertisement. Thank you very much. Azeilander (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any discussion is academic, as the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. I think that you are too close to this topic to be able to write about it as Wikipedia requires. 331dot (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:22, 7 May 2024 review of submission by 216.186.51.108

edit

I'm wondering why it was not accecpted most of the time 216.186.51.108 (talk) 17:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for rejection was given by the reviewer, the topic is "not sufficiently notable". 331dot (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:00, 7 May 2024 review of submission by Snenheh

edit

Why man. This guy is a future athlete, he will be famous. He is already tranfering to a track prep highschool. His story must be heard...!!! Snenheh (talk) 18:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is zero evidence that they pass the criteria at WP:GNG also see WP:TOOSOON. Theroadislong (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"He will be famous" is an admission that he doesn't currently meet notability requirements as Wikipedia defines them. No sources, no article, no debate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 22:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:54, 7 May 2024 review of submission by Ngmusic2222

edit

My article got rejected - I want to know what I can do to help make sure that it can be approved for Wikipedia. Ngmusic2222 (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected means that no further improvement is possible, it won't be considered further at this time. Furthermore, most of it was directly lifted from a source stating "all rights reserved", so I have deleted it as a copyright violation. 331dot (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find where he was awarded a Grammy. He wrote a song for an album that John Legend won a Grammy for, but that went to Legend, not Fink. 331dot (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:29, 7 May 2024 review of submission by 97.189.188.67

edit

why was my article declined? 97.189.188.67 (talk) 22:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No sources, no article, no debate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v AE thread summaries 22:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]