Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 15

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< April 14 << Mar | April | May >> April 16 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 15

edit

00:37:50, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Logan Morrissey

edit


Logan Morrissey (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves. 331dot (talk) 01:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02:19:27, 15 April 2021 review of submission by LordGriot

edit


LordGriot (talk) 02:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Helpdesk, How do I remove this notice from my page...

This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (April 2021)

Thanks in advance.

@LordGriot: That is saying: there are no blue wikilinks leading to the article from other articles. Follow the blue links in the notice to learn how to fix the problem :) CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:53:45, 15 April 2021 review of submission by UJJAL SIKDAR or TUHIN SIKDAR

edit


UJJAL SIKDAR or TUHIN SIKDAR (talk) 04:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)04:53:45, 15 April 2021 review of submission by UJJAL SIKDAR or TUHIN SIKDAR[reply]

When you have finished, click the "Publish changes" button or your request will not be posted!!!-->}}

@UJJAL SIKDAR or TUHIN SIKDAR: you didn't ask a question. Wikipedia is not Social Media that hosts your CV. Please refrain from using all capital letters, it is considered shouting and also hard to read. Victor Schmidt (talk) 05:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Schmidt: FYI, for future information in case you fall on stuff like this again, the above is block evading (see Jimfbleak's talk page). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:46:01, 15 April 2021 review of submission by 2405:201:6:AA3C:7D29:6B4A:65C5:6D6E

edit


If this is not sufficient then how is Sartek still on Wikipedia? Delete that too. Both artists performed together. 2405:201:6:AA3C:7D29:6B4A:65C5:6D6E (talk) 08:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see other stuff exists. It may be that the other article merits deletion, but it won't be deleted just because this one was. Each article or draft is judged on its own merits. 331dot (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:15:06, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Winnergreat

edit


Winnergreat (talk) 09:15, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Winnergreat You already asked HiltroMilanese for advice and they answered your question on their talk page extensive and exhaustive. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draft : Anuj Arora

Why my article is tagged by anyone for deletion i have provided necessary citation whichever is asked

09:23:37, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Manishmewara

edit


Manishmewara (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manishmewara You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not social media for people to tell the world about themselves. Please see the autobiography policy as well. 331dot (talk) 09:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:36:27, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Kookieskat11

edit


Which specific Citations Should I remove in order to make this article more reliable? I have already removed GOOGLE searches. Also How can I edit this article to make it less "Promotional" Thank you! Kookieskat11 (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kookieskat11 The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. No amount of editing can confer notability upon this company. If you are associated with the company, please review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 09:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unreliable sources in your draft include, Google searches, Instagram, Spotify, Applemusic, Wikidata, Blogs, Soundcloud, Twitter, Pinterest, Genius .com, Horoscope dates and Podcasts.apple.Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:19:03, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Bentheshrimp

edit


Bentheshrimp (talk) 11:19, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bentheshrimp You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry im a noob! A submission I made today was rejected and I was hoping you could advise if the changes I have made will make it suitable. It's the first time ive submitted a page and appreciate any help you could give.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bentheshrimp (talk • contribs)

@Bentheshrimp: No, unfortunally not. The notability guideline can be found at WP:NCORP. Right now you have two sources in your draft, the company's about page (not independent) and a guardian article (IMO a passsing mention + a quote of the company CEO). @CommanderWaterford: FYI. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:33:30, 15 April 2021 review of draft by Scuddy07

edit


Scuddy07 (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Good day![reply]

I created something to add to Wikipedia and it was declined. The reason given was that there was not any reliable references. However, I did include the actual reference from a website. I am confused on why the reference I used was not good.

@Scuddy07: Reliable references are news and books. We also do not consider sports database references reliable. Noah 💬 18:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Scuddy07. A minor problem is that you cite the shallow link http://nhltradetracker.com/, whereas the information is deeper on the website, at http://nhltradetracker.com/user/trade_list_by_season/1927-28/1 and http://nhltradetracker.com/user/trade_list_by_season/1927-28/2. The more serious problem is that there's no indication that nhltradetracker.com is a reliable source. Who is the author? Who is the publisher? What sort of editorial process do they have? Do they cite their sources? Do they have a reputation for accuracy and fact checking? Anyone can create a website. That doesn't mean that what they put on it is accurate. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see the point Noah 💬. The good news is that I have also a book called Total NHL that supports my creation. The version I have is the 2003 book. I'm not sure what format is needed to enter this as my reliable sources. What I mean is other than the total, what else is needed? Thanks!

-noah- fix proken ping. Victor Schmidt (talk) 13:40, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Scuddy07: I recommend using template {{cite book}}, its fields help you ensure you've included everything that's important. Replacing the contents of the draft's "References" section with the code: * {{cite book |editor-last1=Diamond |editor-first1=Dan |title=Total NHL |date=2003 |publisher=Triumph Books |location=Chicago |pages=start–end |isbn=978-1-57243-604-6}} will produce the text:
  • Diamond, Dan, ed. (2003). Total NHL. Chicago: Triumph Books. pp. start–end. ISBN 978-1-57243-604-6.
Simply replace the start and end page numbers with whatever pages you actually use. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:23:39, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Palisades1

edit

Hi Ive had two pages accepted but it took over 6 months to be reviewed and accepted. Im told that Im eligible to get a quicker review by using "create articles yourself" vs " Articles for creation". If that is so how do I submit my new page to "Articles for creation" Thanks very much. Palisades1 (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC) Palisades1 (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

I dont have the article ready for submission but Id appreciate some info on how I can get a quicker review. I just dont know how to submit it via "create articles yourself".

Thanks, Palisades1 (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Palisades1 Reviews are done by volunteers who do what they can, when they can, in no particular order. There is no way to speed the process up. I would strongly advise you against placing the draft in the encyclopedia yourself unless you are 100% confident that it would survive a deletion discussion. 331dot (talk) 18:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Palisades1. The Articles for creation (Afc) process is an optional one, and you may bypass it. That doesn't mean a quicker review exactly, it means no review by Afc participants. Whether new articles have gone through Afc or not, they are subject to the New pages patrol (NPP) process, which is another type of review. (Although it's also possible to bypass NPP by gaining the autopatrolled right, that isn't something you'll be able to do soon.)
If you have a draft in draft space or user space (such as your sandbox), you can move that page to article space without submitting it to Afc. Starting a page as a draft gives you the freedom to polish it in relative peace, but you can also write directly in article space. See Help:Your first article. At the bottom of "The basics" section, underneath the big blue "Article Wizard" button, is a text box where you can type an article name, then click the "Create page" button to the right. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:30:49, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Ajay Gupta 0601

edit

Name: Ajay Gupta DOB: 1990 Nationality: Indian Occupation: IT Recruitment Specialist Ajay Gupta 0601 (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Gupta 0601 You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or post their resume. This is not social media. 331dot (talk) 17:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

18:26:32, 15 April 2021 review of submission by Apersonthing3000

edit

I'm new to this article creation thing and I don't know how to do it, also I'm doing this on my Chromebook and it has blocksi on it so I can't really get good resources. Apersonthing3000 (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:20:06, 15 April 2021 review of draft by Benkof

edit


the artists is award winning, headline shows at 02 arena, BBC and other radio stations in UK and ghana have had him for interviews. you only need to search his name to see he is qualifies for a wiki page Benkof (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Benkof If this is the case it will be easy for you to insert independent, reliable sources Wikipedia:Reliable sources to prove your assumptions, currently your draft is full of promotional web links from primary or self-published sources. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:25, 15 April 2021 review of draft by S Tallim

edit


I revised the draft as recommended. All previously uploaded photos were deleted. I now wish to upload photos for which I have obtained permission per copyright requirements of Wikipedia. Please advise how to go about it.

S Tallim S Tallim (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

S Tallim (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@S Tallim: Permissions for free files go to permissions-commons wikimedia.org, though I am not so sure if they accept forwarded emails. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issue is likely resolved as the copyright holder resubmitted the permission via the relevant e-mail account. S Tallim S Tallim (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_April_15&oldid=1019003893"