Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 December 9

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< December 8 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 9

edit

03:11:27, 9 December 2014 review of submission by Banda.krishna

edit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Porsche_IMS_Bearing

Banda.krishna (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had submitted a lot of material on' Kalayana' purely on the basis of the Puranas. Here and there I might have added my observations and conclusions. I am surprised to know that such an information has been rejected attributing bad faith. Was it because I was leaving strong evidence that may lead to the conclusion that the Kalayavana who has bee described in the Puraanas was none other than Alexander the Great ? Please suggest how I can rectify the article and resubmit the same after necessary modifications TO wIKIPEDIA. Banda.krishna (talk) 03:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC) Banda Krishna satyanarayana[reply]

@Banda.krishna:

  This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Help desk. - This is where editors will try to answer any question regarding how to use Wikipedia. Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for any help related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps! Chris Troutman (talk) 03:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07:53:15, 9 December 2014 review of draft by Mikaamit

edit


I want to add a new page without it being reviewed. Is it possible?

Mikaamit (talk) 07:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible but it is generally not a good idea. The individual described in your draft User:Mikaamit/sandbox looks likely to be notable under Wikipedia's standard Wikipedia:ACADEMIC, so you may wish to go ahead and submit it by putting {{subst:submit}} at the top of that page. A review may take weeks, but there is no hurry presumably? Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

09:48:31, 9 December 2014 review of draft by 87.5.15.183

edit

87.5.15.183 (talk) 09:48, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Marybangbang:   Declined This subject is not notable. Articles about Bole have already been thrice deleted. At least try reading the past comments before wasting our time with promotional nonsense. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

12:42:24, 9 December 2014 review of submission by Stuart 1 2 3

edit


Hello

I created a draft page about James Dixon on 13th November. I realise there is a backlog - but I wondered if you could advise if this page is likely to be approved - and if so when I should expect it to go live. Please also let me know if there is anything I can do to improve the page.

Stuart 1 2 3 (talk) 12:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stuart. Drafts are not reviewed in strict order, so there is no way of saying for certain when a review will happen. One could speculate that, having awaited review for nearly a month, it will hopefully happen fairly soon.
With regard to its chances of being accepted, I am not certain. As I understand it, Dixon's claims to notability are essentially his work for a local council, where he was Chairman and also served for a very long period in other senior roles, a primary school being named after him, and mentions of him in local newspapers. This may or may not be enough to establish his notability by Wikipedia's standards... it is rather borderline. Any additional reliable sources that you can provide would help.
It may be worth formatting the two Beckenham Journal mentions as references so that they appear in the References section... they do not need to be available online in order to do so. A reviewer might otherwise not notice that they are valid sources for supporting Dixon's notability. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Stuart 1 2 3:   Declined A person who might be well-known locally is not necessarily considered notable on Wikipedia. Beyond that, this entry needs to have more independent and reliable sources to verify both the facts and your assertion of notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Esteban Escobar

edit

Steven Escovar, president and executive of Diversity News Magazine and president of Diversity News Publications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.82.89 (talk) 13:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

76.94.82.89, what is your question? Your article was deleted for the following reasons: G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://diversitynewsmagazine.com/dn-networks/links/. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

18:31:46, 9 December 2014 review of submission by Lilyb12

edit


Hello, how does one add a picture to a page? I can't see any advice on how to achieve that. Thank you. Lilyb12 (talk) 18:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Lilyb12:   Declined Your account is still too new to upload images. Wikipedia:Images gives the instructions. At this point you need to worry about your draft. I don't think the subject is notable so discussion about images is irrelevant. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_December_9&oldid=1105117657"