Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 September 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion | Log
< September 17
September 19 >

September 18

edit

Template:Diplomatic missions in South Sudan

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template that contains two redirects and one link to a non-resident mission. Unhelpful for navigation. AusLondonder (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PPR

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template used for linking to the long-obsolete Wikipedia:Portal peer review. As a template for an inactive process, it should be deleted. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:36, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Diplomatic missions of the Central African Republic

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only has 1 entry which is now up for deletion. Even if kept, pointless having a nav box for 1 entry. LibStar (talk) 23:15, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now is an empty template. LibStar (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Atlas UNESCO

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a citation template created in 2009 and has only 1 transclusion. A citation template should be created when it has a substantial amount of usages. A single usage after 15 years shows it doesn't have. Subst the single use and delete the template. Gonnym (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Naomi Sharon

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 September 25. ✗plicit 23:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Auf Wiedersehen, Pet

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3 articles. WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 14:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shashidal Union

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article and at most one possible blue link in the body. Most or all of the non-red-links lead to disambiguation pages or the wrong target. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox officeholder/Wikidata

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions seven years after its creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ambiguate

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. If desired I'm also happy to userfy this for potential use. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, template parameters, documentation, or incoming links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 er, the template clearly does have documentation Mach61 03:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. This template appears to be redundant to {{delink}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95 Not quite true; the template removes disambiguators as well, hence "ambiguate" Mach61 04:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1860 railway accidents

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:1860s railway accidents. Izno (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with only two links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can probably be merged into a decade one as Category:Rail transport accident templates has a lot of templates with 1-3 links (see Template:1862 railway accidents). Gonnym (talk) 08:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_18&oldid=1250276563"