Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 30

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 29
March 31 >

March 30 edit

2012 Summer Paralympics wheelchair basketball convenience templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 40 templates per event. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Keanu Reeves and Ana de Armas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly fails WP:FILMNAV and WP:PERFNAV. --woodensuperman 15:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination ... and because I laughed since I thought these two celebrities were a couple, and they had like 7 kids and some of the kids were older than Ana de Armas somehow. Steel1943 (talk) 04:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. CRwikiCA talk 13:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:FILMNAV and WP:PERFNAV on all fronts. --woodensuperman 15:37, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canon EOS digital cameras, 2010-present edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unnecessary splitting of Template:Canon EOS digital cameras. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge/delete No need to have one template split into half. CRwikiCA talk 16:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This sort of complex navbox doesn't aid navigation. Detail should be in articles not navboxes. Nigej (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DeathSpank edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this two years ago, but there was no consensus. I'll try again: it's a navbox for the DeathSpank series, but there is no series article and there are just three entries. Nothing that isn't already explained in the article bodies of those three articles. It's not needed. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:45, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete @Soetermans agreed per nom. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. WP:NAVBOX says that for good navboxes generally "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template." which is missing here (DeathSpank series). Plenty of links in the main article and the two sequels. Nigej (talk) 10:48, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Virtual Boy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 6. (non-admin closure) Aaron Liu (talk) 21:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Currie Cup Log Templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Redundant to what's available at the respective articles. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:28, 14:30, 14:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Promotional language edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Promotional inline. (non-admin closure) Aaron Liu (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Promotional language with Template:Promotion inline.
Mostly duplicate of the other template Aaron Liu (talk) 12:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge seems to serve the same purpose. CRwikiCA talk 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom, I also find {{Promotion inline}} more friendly with a Promotion? default header. Both link to same WP:NOTSOAPBOX. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:18, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if merged, it should use "inline" in its name, since it is an inline template -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 03:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Well yeah, since it’s being merged into a template that already has the inline name in it Aaron Liu (talk) 17:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The nomination says "merge with" not "merge into", so it doesn't specify which way the merge would go -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 03:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Confusion matrix terms edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 6. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guangzhou City F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The team ceased operation. Qby (talk) 11:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_30&oldid=1148659692"