Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 20
April 22 >

April 21 edit

Template:Sinhala cinema edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 29. ✗plicit 00:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Narnia places edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with {{Narnia}}, which already lists the in-universe locations. Not needed. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to {{Narnia}}, per nom. That being said, the redlinks should probably be carried over, so as to encourage article creation. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PPRightPlace edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The ombox is only used on WP:PP, and it would be fine to substitute it there. SWinxy (talk) 18:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SNLCurrentCast edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clear breach of WP:PERFNAV --woodensuperman 15:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unfortunately, as I have used this many times, but WS is correct that this is a perfect example of a template that breaks the rule. Ted Danson would have footers for Cheers, Becker, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Bored to Death, Fargo, The Good Place, Mr. Mayor, etc. if we did this, so we don't. SNL doesn't get the be special. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Amazing Race (American TV series) contestants edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly goes against WP:PERFNAV --woodensuperman 14:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per above.
―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. Gonnym (talk) 14:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Something in this list appears to be used, because the TFD notices are breaking a couple hundred articles like Bad Dürkheim station. I think it might be {{RB color}}. Pinging Gonnym. Also, {{DB-RB stations}} seems to have the same problem, and it has two TFD notices on it. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out. Those weren't supposed to be tagged at all so I've fixed those. Gonnym (talk) 15:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Once Upon a Time trilogy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually a trilogy, also covered by Template:Sergio Leone --woodensuperman 09:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WPBYU invite Bro Brigham edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 April 28. ✗plicit 11:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Note labels edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in the creator's sandbox. Created in 2017. Userfy or subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Userfy. --Clusternote (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_21&oldid=1152318143"