Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 14

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 13 December 15 >

December 14 edit

Template:Hochmeister edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We have a standard system in which this is implemented. We should use that instead directly. Recommend subst and delete. Izno (talk) 07:10, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This seems like a template that has established use for the Hochmeisters and it makes sense to allow this in article on them. Deleting the template does not improve Wikipedia, so it should not be done. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 16:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete after substitution, will also help combining with other succession templates by making it possible to combine more than one in the same "s-start"/"s-end". Frietjes (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • sub and delete per nom. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Third Round Group E table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to respective groups and transclude from there. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

transclude and delete each of these exist on three pages each, but as these aren't going to change, no need to be a template. I'd be up for tables for previous events to be transcluded rather than remain templates. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CONMEBOL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed after merged with attribution. –Aidan721 (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup Comprehensive team results by tournament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge with article, but feel free to delete the table from the article if there is consensus to do so. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No mainspace transclusions. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete ridiculous WP:CRUFT that isn't used. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- Dufo (talk) 21:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as cruft, and it's borderline unreadable. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete yes for me this feels not what Wikipedia is for. --Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 09:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Totally unsourced, unreadable, WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOTSTATS violation. The information is more easily found and presented at the individual tournament articles and the individual national team articles. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 10:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The rationale given is kinda misleading as the tabel was removed from its natural location only just before its nomination here. Long-term performance of nations at the FIFA World Cup is definitely a topic, and this table is the way to present it. It is linked for this purpose from main article FIFA World Cup. Only top four appearances are mentioned in the main article, to keep it light, with a link to a fuller table. This is encouraged by guideline WP:SPLITLIST, which is compatible with WP:NOTSTATS: If there is no "natural" way to split or reduce a long list or table, it may be best to leave it intact, and a decision made to [...] split it off into a stand-alone page. Regardless, a list or table should be kept as short as is feasible for its purpose and scope. Too much statistical data is against policy. Place Clichy (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    That doesn't justify having a template for it though. Templates are used if we need the table in multiple articles, which isn't the case here. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Agreed, I don't think this table should be at several locations. I'm fine with it being transcluded and kept on the records & statistics page. Place Clichy (talk) 15:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete regardless of whether or not the table is needed in FIFA World Cup records and statistics or not (which is a separate discussion), this table has at most 1 use, so a template is not required. Subst if there is consensus to do so, otherwise delete without substing. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge / Subst It is in use on FIFA World Cup records and statistics and should be merged there and discussed as part of the ongoing tidy-up. Spike 'em (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - It is appropriate info for the records and stats page, but I don't know why it's a template instead of just a table there. Wburrow (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into FIFA World Cup records and statistics. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 15:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into FIFA World Cup records and statistics. Ninel (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup group table sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions after previous TfDs. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aussie Peppers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed after merged with attribution. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Akron Racers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Subst and delete. –Aidan721 (talk) 04:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, now substituted with attribution (and the two others added). Frietjes (talk) 00:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sydney Blue Sox roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed after merged with attribution. –Aidan721 (talk) 03:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_14&oldid=1128799705"