Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 18 December 20 >

December 19 edit

Template:Championship clubs map 2010 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map of rugby teams. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cfb division III edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dutch business and financial innovations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These three templates were created by the now-blocked users Zingvin and DUYX (for sockpuppetry), who were noted for their nationalistic edits. "Dutch business and financial innovations": I've never seen another "pioneering innovations" template and it seems quite WP:OR to me. "Dutch constellations": also includes Flemish persons and is again WP:OR. "Early modern Netherlandish cartography, geography and cosmography": just look at the size of that thing, and again WP:OR. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete All feel very much like OR and Synth. I'm not seeing the benefit in what these templates are supposed to provide but delete. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I don't know if it's allowed to vote on your own tfd nomination but the banned user has been trying to revert the tfd process while using an IP address see e.g. this. Combined with the fact these templates are full of OR and Synth, it gives me the feeling these should be deleted. WA8MTWAYC (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete first two, weak keep on the cartography one as Early modern Netherlandish cartography is a topic. Though even the third template is too big. It should be trimmed. --Sankari (talk) 12:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as WP:OR. If someone wants to create something more targeted for Early modern Netherlandish cartography, then go ahead, but this one is clearly too broad. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taiwan politics/party colours/Democratic Progressive Party edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created templates that shouldn't be created anymore. Please see Module:Political party. Gonnym (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Green politics/Core Topics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-pages of {{Green politics}}. Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonnym: These templates seem to be obsolete now. Jarble (talk) 23:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL2016ladderprogression edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused. The ladder progression should be substituted on the 2016 AFL season article since it contains relevant article content to the overall subject. The rest are just links to teams in the league. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party name with color box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Party index link. ✗plicit 00:40, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Party name with color box with Template:Party index link.
Both templates produce almost the exact same output:

Aside from the slight size and border difference, {{Party name with color box}} offers also |2= to use a different label name. Gonnym (talk) 16:37, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is undocumented in Party name with color box, as I stated. It should be documented when the new documentation is written -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maurice Hatton edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, navboxes should contain a minimum of five links. This navbox consists of two, only one of which is a film, leaving nothing to navigate. ✗plicit 12:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Scottish politics/party colours/Scottish Conservatives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Scottish political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Separtycol-jl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Swedish political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 08:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:German politics/party colours/AfD edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused German political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 08:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Moldovan politics/party colours/AMN edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:52, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Moldovan political party color templates. Gonnym (talk) 07:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Regional Mexican Radio in Wyoming edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A broken template redundant to {{Spanish Radio Stations in Wyoming}} which itself has just three entries. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - none of the articles in the navbox appear to be airing a Regional Mexican format anymore.--Tdl1060 (talk) 04:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Unused. Nigej (talk) 10:21, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ESPN Iowa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of the five stations, one is news/talk with sports, one is Regional Mexican (KAYL), and the other three are also in {{Sports Radio Stations in Iowa}}. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:06, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 03:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 10:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ESPN Alaska edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Sports Radio Stations in Alaska}}, itself a fairly small navbox. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomiantion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--Tdl1060 (talk) 03:57, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NAVBOX #4: There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template Otherwise, we end up with WP:TCREEP and groupings of random cross sections with questionable notability.—Bagumba (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. List of ESPN Radio affiliates has a list of the stations by state. This one, and the other 50 or so ESPN ones could all be deleted, as they seem superfluous to the {{Sports Radio Stations in Alaska}} series. They don't seem to provide much extra in the way of navigation, they just clutter up the bottom of articles like KTZN with a confusing array of multi-colored banners . Nigej (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_19&oldid=1063326116"