Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 24

< August 23	August 25 >

August 24 edit

Ultimate Marvel edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ultimate X-Men (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ultimate Spider-Man (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ultimate Marvel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Ultimate X-Men and Template:Ultimate Spider-Man with Template:Ultimate Marvel.
There are not that many articles about the Ultimate Marvel imprint, and the "Ultimate Marvel" template already does a good job of keeping them grouped. Note that there are few articles about "Ultimate X" characters, most of the links in the X-Men one are links to "X" or "Alternative versions of X", where the Ultimate imprint is discussed in just a section. Cambalachero (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 02:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think a merge here is inappropriate. The combined template appears inferior to the two separate, much-more cohesive templates. I would be inclined to suggest that Ultimate Marvel should be a "meta-"template, directing readers to the series pages, and suggest removing the rest of the stuff on the Ultimate Marvel template. Merging might reasonably be reconsidered at a later date if the many articles were instead merged as variously appropriate, since not all of them seem to display notability. --Izno (talk) 12:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Viva Blue edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. but history merge the new template with the old template Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Viva Blue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused and is redundant to another template, Viva Blue map. BLAixx 23:24, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Histmerge Template:Viva Blue map into Template:Viva Blue. (The old template should have been updated, rather than a new one created.) Useddenim (talk) 01:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see that the old template should have been updated. However I propose that the merged template be located at Viva Blue map for consistency with the other templates — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blaixx (talk • contribs) 16:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Frietjes (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: still waiting for an Admin to do the histmerge so that the page can be moved ... Useddenim (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medieval Cholas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Medieval Cholas (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single-use template, should be merged with the article. there is no need to keep the content in a template if it is only used in one article. Frietjes (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest cities of Kosovo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of Kosovo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is unused. See also Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_28#Template:Largest_cities_of_Serbia, which is almost identical situation. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-art-70-3d edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 September 2. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:06, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-art-70-3d (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Disney Resort Line station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Disney Resort Line station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used in only a single page. I'd be okay with subst/delete or simple replacement with an appropriate template and subsequent deletion. Izno (talk) 04:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).