Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< August 10 August 12 >

August 11 edit

Template:Saints Row universe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) feminist 06:54, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially the same template as Template:Saints Row but with original research. (While there are shared elements between Saints Row and Red Faction, Saints Row shared universe wasn't really a thing until Agents of Mayhem was announced) The series template can cover all these content sufficiently already. AdrianGamer (talk) 06:52, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Original navbox is sufficient as the navbox isn't the place to list every tangential reference to the series. It can go in the articles if referenced, though.   czar 20:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-Seychelles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seychelles does in fact have copyrights; see Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights. Also, this template misrepresents Wikipedia guidelines, which respect rights of countries with no copyright relations with the US. See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-Nauru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template misrepresents Wikipedia guidelines, which respect rights of countries with no copyright relations with the US. See Wikipedia talk:Copyrights/Archive 14#RfC: What to do with respect to the copyright of countries with which the US does not have copyright relations? Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ultimate Marvel edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 24. Frietjes (talk) 16:36, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jitex BK squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy to User:Hmlarson/Jitex BK squad. (non-admin closure) feminist 06:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

all red links, no reason to have the template. the team currently plays in the 3rd tier of Swedish women's football so it is unlikely that enough players will become notable enough to justify the existence of this template. Could be re-created if/when the team gets promoted back up to a level where some of the players would have articles. Joeykai (talk) 00:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Userfy to my userspace until links can be re-activated. Hmlarson (talk) 00:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy - from the out of date team list in the club article it seems this was a useful navbox at one point and could be again. Question: arecthere any current notable players in the squad with WP articles? Fenix down (talk) 06:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
None of the current players have wikipedia articles Joeykai (talk) 17:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_August_11&oldid=1074062671"