Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 December 1

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< November 30 December 2 >

December 1 edit

Template:Infobox urban feature edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 December 10 Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sil Lai Abrams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Userfy @Baxter91: Moved to User:Baxter91/Template:Sil Lai Abrams (non-admin closure) Pppery 01:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A template without the main page which is still in draft Draft:Sil Lai Abrams Marvellous Spider-Man 13:13, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Baxter91: Are you planning to ever attempt to get it out of draft status by submitting it for review? — Gestrid (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Baxter91: More specifically, would you be open to moving this template to user space until the draft is approved? It won't change anything other than to move it out of the "forward-facing" portion of the project until the draft is in the mainspace. It cleans things up a bit for editors of templates as well, since it removes it from various database reports, cleanup tasks, etc. ~ Rob13Talk 19:20, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Rob13: Yes, I'd be totally fine with it being moved to user space. Can you just provide me with the link when it's done? (I'm very new to Wikipedia and it isn't easy for me to find things, LOL. Baxter91 (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US-business-bio-1660s-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob13Talk 09:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US-business-bio-1650s-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob13Talk 09:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US-business-bio-1620s-stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very unlikely to ever be used. ~ Rob13Talk 09:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Thailand Squad navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 09:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, most of these are non-notable squads. if there is a natural home for the content in any of these, we can always merge those with the respective squad articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Independent College Athletic Conference ice hockey standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to user space Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. ~ Rob13Talk 09:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be using them eventually when I have the time to create the main pages for the 1964-65 through 1969-70 seasons. PensRule11385 Talk 00:21, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • As I stated on my user talk page when you commented, we could userfy these until you're ready to use them. We typically don't store templates in the template space unless they're imminently going to be used somewhere on the project. ~ Rob13Talk 01:20, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plink edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted as per WP:G7 upon request. ~ Rob13Talk 19:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not being used and outdated by newer templates. Employs an outdated template in its code {{waybackdate}} which is a redirect to {{wayback}} which is currently being merged to {{webarchive}}. The template would need to be rewritten, and if so would duplicate {{webarchive}} or {{url}} which are more developed. GreenC 03:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay to speedy — as creator of the unused template. In fact, I don't remember why I ever created it, almost 9 years ago. - Wikidemon (talk) 05:49, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Challenges edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of these articles in themselves are eligible for AFD, DRV (someone forgot to put a {{rally}} template on the mannequin one, so the closing user believed all the ineligible keep !votes, forcing me to DRV it), merging to the list of Internet memes, or even speedy (the mannequin one was created by a abusive sock). KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It may be easier to delete the articles and then remove those thinks from the template than to do it all at once. Hyacinth (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • ugggh, have any of the non-notable ones deleted at AFD, then reconsider. as stated above, it's better to delete the articles first. Frietjes (talk) 14:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I do not understand this odd crusade KATMAKROFAN is on regarding the Mannequin Challenge or anything related to it. It was overwhelming consensus to keep the article, and now the rampage is spreading to other areas like this template. -- Fuzheado | Talk 02:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Hyacinth and Frietjes. If there comes a time where there aren't enough of these articles left to warrant a template, deletion can be revisited.— Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Viet Nam Continents edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The navigation box for Miss Viet Nam Continents navigates nothing and therefore must be deleted. Richie Campbell (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete – the only working links all go to the same article, which seems to be the only pertinent article. With no other articles to navigate to this is pointless.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 09:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I cannot for the life of me remember why I created this template. Probably was trying to help a newbie but in any case the template is clearly pointless now. Pichpich (talk) 19:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2016_December_1&oldid=1142562480"