Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 6 September 8 >

September 7 edit

Template:Comics creator redi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 15#Template:Comics creator redi. Alakzi (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned looks like incomplete template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment It looks complete to me. Is this a substitution template? Its code looks like it is used to build the categorization scheme for a page. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Common fish 2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Orphaned and author requested deletion. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 08:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - This is overlooked debris I should have deleted at the time it was created . The proper template is {{Common fish}}. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment neither template, {{common fish}} nor {{common fish 2}} is properly formatted. They custom code wikitables instead of using the base sidebar templates to build out from. They should be rebuilt to use {{Sidebar}} -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colorado School of Mines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_26#Template:Colorado School of Mines. ~ RobTalk 06:11, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment it is now in use, and navigates 5 articles (University, Museum, Orediggers, and two stadiums) -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, now in use. BethNaught (talk) 06:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite isbn/978012397825 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Beyond the small amount of participation here, there was strong consensus to deprecate {{Cite isbn}} previously at Template talk:Cite isbn. There was no rationale advanced for keeping this here despite that decision. ~ RobTalk 21:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned cite ISBN template subpage Ricky81682 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recall a recent discussion that determined these were to be deprecated by inlining, and I've seen bots doing some of that. Is deleting these not surely part of that, as it will be lot of work to do them manually. Or are these (this and the ones below) just left over?--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 23:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion. Some are still in use so I don't know. It may be people creating them anyways or the deletion wasn't done by the bots. We're having the same issue with User:Dexbot removing template:cite doi but not tagging or deleting any of the thousands of Category:Cite doi templates it is orphaning. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thousands. So not just a few left over. It might be better to have a bot do these, assuming they are all now unused, or at least nominate them en-masse.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Category:ISBN templates had only 209 citation so that threw me off. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an ISBN database. We should not hesitate in deleting unused templates for this template system if they come up each on their own and not some massive nomination. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I don't see how WP:NOT, addresses ISBNs. The closest is that Wikipedia is not a directory, but the way ISBN templates are used - i.e. only ISBNs that are being cited - does not occur to me that we are making Wikipedia a directory. Maximilianklein (talk) 21:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This particular template is still unused. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite hdl/10088.2F8309 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused template. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chinese leap year (2001-2100) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chinese leap year (1901-2000) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused template Ricky81682 (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iglu & Hartly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Directly related articles are one album and one single from that album; therefore, navigation is not improved by the navbox as readers can already link to and from each of the articles without it. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox political party leadership election campaign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Infobox election campaign}}. Alakzi (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite jsp336 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hard-coded instance of cite book used as a citation template for a single article. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite isbn/978953307518 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned old cite isbn page Ricky81682 (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite isbn/978887283436 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned old cite isbn template. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite isbn/978935136806 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned old cite isbn template. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite doi/10.1136.2Fbmj.d4488 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 21:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned citation template that isn't used anywhere. Been a recent target for vandalism as well. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:44, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Angola squad All Africa Games 2011 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 06:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template Ricky81682 (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Angels by Type edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. ~ RobTalk 06:09, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused sidebar template. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Angel (Disambiguation) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_26#Template:Angel (Disambiguation). ~ RobTalk 06:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned unused sidebar Ricky81682 (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This template was in the process of being improved prior to the time this notification arrived. Twillisjr (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was created in June 2013 and hasn't been edited since November. What process are you talking about? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this template makes no sense, it is not disambiguation -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_September_7&oldid=1138533214"