Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 28

< November 27	November 29 >

November 28 edit

Template:Before Their Eyes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Before Their Eyes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, due to linking to less than five articles outside of the subject. STATic message me! 23:48, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If you're using NENAN as your sole criteria, many of the navboxes you nominated link to articles on individual band members which should be counted toward that minimum. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep, has enough links. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Has enough links --Jax 0677 (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Like Moths to Flames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Like Moths to Flames (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, due to linking to less than five articles outside of the subject. STATic message me! 23:25, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SDOLinkBeautifuler edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SDOLinkBeautifuler (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-functional attempt at a link formatter, not used outside of creator's userspace Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OPT1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OPT1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template consisting only of a hardcoded date Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MyAgeIs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MyAgeIs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Wrapper around Template:Age with one particular age hardcoded into it. Not used outside of userspace. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MunichDRIVECurrent edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MunichDRIVECurrent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article referencing drive seems to not exist Magioladitis (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MunichREFERENCEDRIVECurrent edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MunichREFERENCEDRIVECurrent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article referencing drive seems to not exist Magioladitis (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MunichREFERENCEDRIVE edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MunichREFERENCEDRIVE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains only red links. Magioladitis (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MunichDrive edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MunichDrive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Contains only red links Magioladitis (talk) 21:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Worcester City F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Worcester City F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hasn't really been updated since it was created over a year ago. Conference North club so most of these players will not have articles unless promotion is achieved. Echetus Xe 19:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete, out of date. Frietjes (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CS Pandurii Târgu Jiu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CS Pandurii Târgu Jiu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to warrant a navbox. The only articles about this subject, are the club article, the stadium article and one season article. Mentoz86 (talk) 12:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. Frietjes (talk) 18:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Personal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Personal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have {{Talk header}} and {{calm}}. Magioladitis (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, we have too many of these banners and this one is very similar to the other two.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. STATic message me! 23:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SpokenSpam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SpokenSpam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Magioladitis (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete after substituting the one talk archive transclusion. Looks like this was created to address what was only a minor problem (4 files discussed) in the first place, and probably got no use after that. --RL0919 (talk) 02:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject critical source examination:Thucydides edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject critical source examination:Thucydides (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Created in 2007 and it is an invitation to discussion. The discussion must be over now I guess. Magioladitis (talk) 10:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Long past any usefulness. --RL0919 (talk) 02:32, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikify-talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikify-talk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We don't need this kind of templates around IMO. A simple message on the talk page should be suffice. Magioladitis (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and Delete. Only used a handful of times in 2005 by the editor who created it (who hasn't been active for a couple of years now). Substitute so the information on his activities isn't lost from the article talk pages he posted it to. --RL0919 (talk) 02:17, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ref cleanup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ref cleanup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Similar maintenance are in articles pages. This is a non-standard form for talk pages. Magioladitis (talk) 10:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. STATic message me! 23:13, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If someone wants to suggest changing the reference style of the article, they should actually talk about it on the Talk page, not tag the Talk page with a template. --RL0919 (talk) 02:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Notchat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:T3. RockMagnetist (talk) 15:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notchat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

We have {{Talk header}} and {{Not a forum}}. Magioladitis (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:First sentence V WT warning edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:First sentence V WT warning (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single purpose banner. It served its purpose 2 years ago and now it is unused. Magioladitis (talk) 10:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ah, old times. Probably never needed to be a template in the first place, but in any case its usefulness is long past. --RL0919 (talk) 02:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bbblock edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bbblock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-standard user block template. It survived TfD in 2008 but by this time it was widely used. Nowadays block templates have been standardise and this template is now unused. Magioladitis (talk) 09:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Not useful. STATic message me! 23:11, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Superseded by better templates. It is hard to determine usage of templates that are substituted, but this link shows where the image in the template gets used. I spot-checked a few dozen entries and didn't find uses past 2009; it appears it's heyday was 2007. --RL0919 (talk) 02:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PlantFiles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. DrKiernan (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PlantFiles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template links to a website that doesn't remotely resemble a reliable source for botanical information. The source is a combination of user generated and wiki type content. It is very rarely used (and then the use is replaced with reliable sources if the information is accurate). First Light (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: this template is unused. First Light (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. External link sources generally don't need templates unless they are widely used, which this doesn't appear to be. --RL0919 (talk) 02:31, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.