Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 10

< April 9	April 11 >

April 10 edit

Template:Fb team Ilaoa & Toomata edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fb team Ilaoa & Toomata (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template contains a red link, isn't being used and there is another template Fb team Ilaoa and Toomata that also exists. wilson (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused template with no documentation or indication as to what possible use it might be. -- Whpq (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Numismatic navigational template notice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Numismatic navigational template notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to the more widely used {{collapsible option}}. I removed it from several templates which were using both. Frietjes (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Latest stable software release/Palaver edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Latest stable software release/Palaver (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Article was userfied and no intentions since last summer were done to improve the article and show notability about this IRC client. mabdul 13:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep is reasonable, as is delete. Article is waiting for reliable sources to appear, so no need for this template yet, but it's rather harmless. Please note: editor was very cooperative in userfication and deletion from mainspace. --Lexein (talk) 15:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Assuming the article makes it back into mainspace, I don't see where this template would be useful. It is {{LSR}} with specific values filled in and would ever be used in that one article. It appears to be a misunderstanding of tempalte usage. Using LSR directly in the article would make mores sense. -- Whpq (talk) 18:28, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Against All Will edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Against All Will (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, there should be at least five articles (not counting the primary article) on which the navbox will be used.

In this case, there are now only 3 links, and will soon be only 2.

There were 5 links, but I have just removed the links to the band's 2 singles, having redirected them them to the band page[1][2] per the merge tags applied to those articles by the template creator[3][4]

Note that the only article on an album by the band is A Rhyme & Reason, which the template creator has also tagged for merger. Once that's done, the template will appear only on the head article plus the two articles on band members. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 07:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Once allt he redriect/merging activity is complete, there won't be sufficient actual articles to navigate between. - Whpq (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.