Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 January 8

January 8

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hunter Carter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that was most likely meant to be an article that was previously deleted. (Hunter Carter) J36miles (talk) 22:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was

Template:I have a question (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and not needed template. J36miles (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Filmbiorationale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

since User:Carnildo converted the template to a standard rationale, this template is totally useless and should be merged/redirected. mabdul 11:50, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was No Consensus. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Papa Vs Pretty (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardly navigates anything. —Justin (koavf)TCM06:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 05:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lana Del Rey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

With only one album, and two singles, there is no need for a template for this artist. A template is for navigational use, and with only three entries, it is quite irrelevant and useless. Status {talkcontribs 01:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.