Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 26

< January 25	January 27 >

January 26 edit

Template:UEFA Elite stadia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:22, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA Elite stadia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template displays an old system no longer in use, see UEFA stadium categories. The template is also unused Reckless182 (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 6 for previous discussion on Template:UEFA5Star.--Reckless182 (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UEFA4Star edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA4Star (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template displays an old system no longer in use, see UEFA stadium categories. The similar template Template:UEFA5Star has already been deleted on the same grounds. Reckless182 (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 6 for previous discussion on Template:UEFA5Star.--Reckless182 (talk) 18:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Espaillat Province edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_Zero 17:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Espaillat Province (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to Template:Municipalities of the Dominican Republic Mhiji 22:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now. There is a whole category of these (Category:Dominican Republic provinces templates) and merged version is very large. I think it's better to do away with the big one, and use these smaller more targeted ones to avoid dwarfing the article with such a large navigation footer. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 13:24, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bree Sharp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete, it appears the redirects have not been reverted, so there is no major objections. As a result, this navigation box is not really necessary for two albums. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bree Sharp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost all content was redirected; only the studio albums have articles. WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. You failed to mention who redirected the articles ([1], [2], [3]) immediately before nominating the template for deletion. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 13:21, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter who redirected the singles? They were obviously failing WP:NSONGS. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Polar Music Prize edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Polar Music Prize (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to the article Polar Music Prize. Since the award itself is not particularly important, there's no need to navigate these musicians' articles in this way.—indopug (talk) 13:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this award is one of the most important music prize. The laureates are awarded 1 mil. Swedish kronors ($144644.36).-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 14:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete First, a large amount of money does not make an award notable. Apart from that, regarding the template, I concur that this is not needed, the award is sufficiently mentioned in the articles and the imo topic is not one that specifically requires navigation. Hekerui (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Quite an important award, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with the template, and generally templates are unimportant to their own articles, but an aid to the navigability of the topics it concerns. --That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 01:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For that purpose a list might do better? Rich Farmbrough, 23:10, 25th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Airplaneman ✈ 13:13, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rodovid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rodovid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. External link template masquerading as a sister project template. The website's article is gone, suggesting this is not notable. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: template for spaming an untrustworthy website. --Otberg (talk) 20:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: for the reasons stated in nomination and above comment. Dialectric (talk) 12:52, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South African ties edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South African ties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded by {{Foreign relations of South Africa}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Romanian Prime Ministers Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Prime Ministers Timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Totally broken. Anyway, a timeline of "prime ministers" would most likely be linear, which defeats the purpose of the most common form of 2-D timeline. (This one might as well be 58-D, for all I know. It seems to be broken beyond repair.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Romania ties edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romania ties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Same arguments apply as for Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 10#Template:Nigerian ties. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Romanian bread edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted under WP:G7. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian bread (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. An empty navbox, with only footer links. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Go right ahead, I created a whole bunch of templates for various types of bread based on country. This particular national group only has one entry and it is really unneeded. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Welsh Football League Division Three edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Welsh Football League Division Three (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Welsh Football League Division Three teamlist}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Welsh Football League Second Division edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Welsh Football League Second Division (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Welsh Football League Division Two teamlist}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ricardo Lancaster-Jones y Verea (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

An unused template consisting of a gallery with one image. No scope for use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:40, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ricky Martin Awards edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ricky Martin Awards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. The awards won by an artist are not deserving of a navbox. For one, where would it go? — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:39, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/PC NL/colhead edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/PC NL/colhead (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused template, that has been replaced with Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador/colhead. The user who created it, has admitted he is a novice at templates, and has asked me to work on the Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador templates. 117Avenue (talk) 06:33, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/PC NL/row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/PC NL/row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused template, that has been replaced with Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador/row. The user who created it, has admitted he is a novice at templates, and has asked me to work on the Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador templates. 117Avenue (talk) 06:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Newfoundland and Labrador Progressive Conservative edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Newfoundland and Labrador Progressive Conservative (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is an unused template, that has been replaced with Template:Canadian politics/party colours/Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador. The user who created it, has admitted he is a novice at templates, and has asked me to work on the Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador templates. 117Avenue (talk) 06:27, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.