Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 10

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< April 9 April 11 >

April 10 edit

Template:POVW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:POVW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless warning message. WOSlinker (talk) 23:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nutrition tasks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nutrition tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 5 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 23:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nextsunday edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as a test page Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nextsunday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template doesn't show next Sunday. Only one fixed date. WOSlinker (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's a fixed date. Useless then. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 21:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Toutes Les Filles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as housekeeping - main article deleted, no other links on the navbox, unused and unusable. BencherliteTalk 13:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Toutes Les Filles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox for deleted band. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toutes Les Filles. WOSlinker (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Derek Brough edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete Polargeo (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Derek Brough (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template about a subject of a previous deletion discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Brough. Clubmarx (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete, part of a series of hoax entries. Hairhorn (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete - The artist's article was deleted as a hoax, the album is up for CSD as a hoax. The template links to no information that can be linked to the artist (if they even exist). OlYellerTalktome 21:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, all of the author's other articles have been deleted as a hoax. See here, here, and here.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Intercontinental Cup and FIFA Club World Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Intercontinental Cup and FIFA Club World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It has previously been determined that the Intercontinental Cup and the FIFA Club World Cup are entirely separate competitions, whose statistics should not be presented as congruous. Each competition already has its own navbox (see Template:Intercontinental Cup (football) and Template:FIFA Club World Cup), and the articles recently created that imply a link between the two competitions are in the process of being deleted. – PeeJay 13:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – PeeJay 13:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Writing/Introduction edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. History merge is unnecessary because the same editor also created the other page, so all contributions are already properly attributed. RL0919 (talk) 14:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Writing/Introduction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named template that is not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete the "Where to start" page; history merge the "Categories" page. Unfortunately, the Categories page appears to have been subject to a cut-and-paste move by a different editor than the ones who contributed the material initially, so history merging is the appropriate way to preserve the contributions. RL0919 (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Technology/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:59, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/History/Things you can do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. No histmerge needed since Portal:Geography/Categories was started fresh without using the material from the old page. RL0919 (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Geography/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:58, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Things you can do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Culture/Wikiprojects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/ edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Orphaned with no use User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 04:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Categories (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Did you know (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Featured article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Featured picture (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Intro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Where to start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Art/Wikiprojects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Oddly named set of templates that are not used. WOSlinker (talk) 12:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject: Watches/to do edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:41, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject: Watches/to do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 3 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 12:24, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Shinto/to do edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Shinto/to do (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused project to do page in template space. Hasn't been updated for 2 years and there are no links to it either. WOSlinker (talk) 12:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nsfw edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nsfw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Violates WP:NODISCLAIMERS. This template is only used on a few pages anyway - most of them talk pages, and one article, Brent Corrigan. As the article makes clear, he's a gay porn actor, so I really don't think we need to warn people that his website may be 'not safe for work'. Robofish (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete Under criterion T2, templates that are "unambiguous misrepresentations of established policy" can be speedily deleted. This explicitly includes "disclaimer templates intended to be used in articles." Intelligentsium 18:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per Intelligensium. I think WP:NODISCLAIMERS is a greatly flawed guideline, but so long as it is one this is in clear violation of it. —what a crazy random happenstance 12:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete per above (citing WP:NODISCLAIMERS and WP:CSD#T2). Airplaneman ✈ 19:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete per above. I went ahead and tagged it for T2. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 00:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep: I removed the speedy tag. While I agree that the template should definitely not be used in articles, I see potential for legitimate use in non-article space, as a notice for editors during discussions (for example, I arrived at this page after this template was used in an ANI discussion). Something to consider. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:European Nationality Law edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:European Nationality Law (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Depreciated and orphaned, replaced by Template:Nationality laws. Non-controversial delete. —what a crazy random happenstance 09:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Inappropiateinfobox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 14:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inappropiateinfobox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Orphaned template. Don't really see the need here. Avicennasis @ 09:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of photography edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 15:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of photography (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not a history section. All articles in this template are really lists of photographers by country. Clubmarx (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_April_10&oldid=1146551888"