Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2010/June

< Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion‎ | Log

June 30 edit

Category:American football draft stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Upmerge to Category:American football stubs. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cat:Algerian garden stubs/{{Algeria-garden-stub}} edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Delete - unused, created in April without proposal, [[permcat is a red link. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cat:Afro Caribbean stubs/{{AfroCaribbean-stub}} edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 29 edit

Category:Nelson and Tasman geography stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename to Cat:Nelson and Tasman Region geography stubs. Ruslik_Zero 16:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category currently hosts stubs for 2 separate regions, each with their own permcat (Category:Nelson Region and Category:Tasman Region). Each region has its own stub template, {{Nelson-geo-stub}} and {{Tasman-geo-stub}}. I think we should upmerge the first as underpopulated, and rename the category to Cat:Tasman Region geography stubs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    • The Nelson and Tasman Regions are usually regarded within NZ as being part and parcel of the same area - most Kiwis would probably say that Nelson was the capital of Tasman, and a lot of these stubs lie within both regions. It makes a lot of sense pragmatically to group these together, especially as Nelson will probably never have enough stubs for its own category. I'd suggest simply renaming to Cat:Nelson and Tasman Region geography stubs. Grutness...wha? 23:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

Regions of NZ clean-up edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Administrative close: rename has gone ahead; whoever did it omitted to close the discussion here. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Rename the following categories:

Reason: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 June 21#Regions of NZ clean-up. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I was nominator of the categories at the CFD—this was next on my to-do list of getting these cleaned up. These should be renamed now for consistency. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support from me, too, since I started the tidy-up of the NZ region categories. Grutness...wha? 03:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rename all per last CFD discussion.--Lenticel (talk) 02:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 27 edit

{{japan-album-stub}} / Category:Japanese album stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 15 edit

Category:Greater Vancouver Regional District stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename all. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:19, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Greater Vancouver Regional District stubs to Category:Metro Vancouver stubs
Category:Greater Vancouver Regional District geography stubs to Category:Metro Vancouver geography stubs
Category:Greater Vancouver Regional District school stubs to Category:Metro Vancouver school stubs

The Greater Vancouver Regional District changed its name to Metro Vancouver in 2007, and the parent category was recently renamed. I am not sure whether the stub templates ({{GVRD-stub}}, {{GVRD-geo-stub}}, {{GVRD-school-stub}}) should be renamed, but the categories definitely ought to be. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 11 edit

{{stub-sun}} / Category:Sun stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete both. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Original template is malnamed and the creator did not properly fill out the asbox template (an error I have since corrected). Category does not use any of the project templates. None of this has been approved. Only one article in category. I'm recommeding deleting both the template and the category, and moving the article to Cat:star stubs or Cat:astronomy stubs. Someone more versed in the field may be able to suggest a better placement for this article.

If the original creator wishes to keep this category, I'd suggest renaming the template to {{sun-stub}}, placing the category under Cat:Star stubs and filling the category with a good number of articles (60 or more). Dawynn (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done I agree to Dawynn's preposition for renaming the stub. Sun is very important and there is many unwritten articles about it which may be stubs in beginning. I will do as he said. Alex discussion 14:28, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 9 edit

Category:Conductor stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Rename all. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Propose renaming:
Reason - Conductor is ambiguous. The proposed title is per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 May 24#Category:Conductors. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:54, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 6 edit

Cat:Human genetic history stubs/{{Human genetic history-stub}} edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Misnamed template, malformed category with no parent stub category. The scan for the intersection between the permcat and waht seems to be the best parent stub cat, Cat:Genetics stubs, shows only 3 hits. Delete both. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:30, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, no articles inside the stub cats as well.--Lenticel (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

June 4 edit

Cat:SCi video game stubs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete; no objections and category has remained empty. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The former SCI Entertainment Group PLC is now Square Enix Europe. For this reason, I have kept the template ({{SCi-videogame-stub}}), but have altered its text to reflect the new name, and placed the template under Cat:Square Enix stubs. Because several games are listed under the SCi name, I would like to keep the template, but the category can be deleted. Dawynn (talk) 09:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2010/June&oldid=374777322"