Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 57

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 50 ← Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60

Vicki Lansky

reasoning -173.16.185.83 (talk) 20:13, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

your reasoning for asking to undelete it -173.16.185.83 (talk) 20:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:09, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

OTRS ticket 2011062010009314 covers content from http://www.practicalparenting.com and so this should be restored assuming there are no other violations from elsewhere. – Adrignola talk 19:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Noted, and my clerknote is struck. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:34, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
  Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:52, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Aether Records

Appears to have been deleted because the label reissued previously released records. However, several releases were first-issue, including the link below, and others, including Tombstone Valentine - Hidden World, Many Bright Things, Ice Nine, Problematics, Cheetah Chrome/Mike Hudson and two LP's by Vas Deferens Organization. Believe this label is deserving of a page here. -50.90.149.63 (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


Quoting from the deleted page: This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference. 05:31, 28 March 2011 SchuminWeb (talk | contribs) deleted "Aether Records" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: non-notable record label that reissued previous publications)

Link to a notable issue:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazinga_Phaser

Wikipedia is not a source for itself, and notability isn't hereditary. You need to show that the subject, in and of itself, meets WP:Notability (organizations and companies). —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Ankamale.PNG

reasoning -CN-07 (talk) 22:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

  Malformed Request - please use {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. You need to provide info as described on the tag. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Ism (band)

contesting PROD. -Chubbles (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. January (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Lockman Hole

Lockman Hole was deleted in the Marshallsumter incident as documented at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/User:Marshallsumter_Incident_Article_Fix-up_Coordination_Page

Based on Wikipedia:Requested articles/Natural sciences/Astronomy and cosmology and Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL it seems that it would indeed be worth an article, and I'd like to see what was there before it was deleted and possibly make it into a suitable article or stub. I'll look for and fix any of the sort of copyright violations that led to the ban. -★NealMcB★ (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Nealmcb/Lockman Hole. At least the initial stub looks reasonable and you're willing to go through it. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Can I get the talk page also? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 00:13, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
  Done The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond

This is one of my first book articles that I created under my old disclosed Schuym1 account. The article was deleted by prod and I would like it restored. I found [1], [2], [3], [http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=90851], [4], [5], [6], and [7]. -SL93 (talk) 14:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 15:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Agneyee

More information and notabality can be put in. -Rahul Das, Advocate 17:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agneyee This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia.

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Rd2kin/Agneyee . You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Alexf (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Timothy Dove

reasoning -Phoenixmiddleschoolmax (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Deleted by Speedy Deletion because said person was not significant. He is significant for being the 2010 Ohio Teacher of the Year and having a documentary on PBS.

Then cite them. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Dove, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Wizardman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:39, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Nami face.jpg

This non-free image was deleted for lack of usage after the article Nami (One Piece) was merged into List of One Piece characters. Consensus on the matter has changed and the page is no longer a redirect. I figured it would be easier to have the old image restored rather than to find and upload a new one. -Goodraise 22:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done Skier Dude (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Fashion 5.0 December 2011 Cover Ali Fedotowsky.jpg

as publisher, I Morgan Myrmo own copyright to this image and allow usage in Wikipedia -Morganmyrmo (talk) 01:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

You need to clear this through our volunteer response team first, especially because we cannot and do not allow "Wikipedia-only" images. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

The Security Ray

reasoning -Maksudul haque (talk) 08:59, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Vajazzling

reasoning -Bebe Jumeau (talk) 14:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Vajazzling is a legitimate topic for discussion - it is highly popular in the United Kingdom throughout 2011 and widely mentioned in both electronic media - such as Nowhere Else but Essex and also print media especially and has been the subject of academic papers by Pamela Church Gibson of the London university of the Arts

it is related to the UK mainstream press discussion in recent weeks on Muff Marches and designer vaginas and vagina and labio plasty surgeries and also the USA practice of vajacials which are facial style treatments for vaginas

the debates around deletions earlier in 2011 did not seem to be well informed and also reflected a US cultural perspective and I suspect a male cultural perspective and perhaps even a religious POV

it may not be to everyone's taste but it's a fact of modern life


so can we restore Vajazzling to have a more real and accurate wikipedia experience not a walt disney norman rockwell experience

  •   Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at ‎Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vajazzling, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

File:EverQuest - East Commonlands tunnel.jpg

This are computer game screenshots for the EverQuest game. The first one was speedy deleted in november 2010 although the file was uploaded in october 2004. We had a discussion about it in 2005 and the file was tagged with 'Non-free game screenshot' template which should be enough for fair-use rational. The reason for deletion was "no fair use rationale" but the fair-use rationale was in the template just below : "a computer video game". The other one were also deleted because of a lack of fair-use. Isn't a computer game screenshot enough as a rational?

Please let me know what I should do to have those images restored :-) -Hashar (talk) 10:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done All three restored with the time reset so that you can study the edit history and have a week. All of them need to be used in an article and a detailed fair use rationale for that article. Plese check also Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline--Tikiwont (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Outsource magazine

The article was considered non-notable however, I had included citations that proved a targeted circulation that was audited by the ABC and was received by a substantial and key demographic of around 12,000 core opinion formers (in print alone) in its chosen industry sector who respect the editorial and read it regularly. The magazine is also sent digitally to a large database of opt in subscribers who feel that the magazine is both notable and relevant to them and their industry. If required I can add additional citations/references to prove this. As the page creator I was also only notified of the PROD process on Saturday morning so expected to have several more days to veto the deletion which I was then not given. -Dave Louca 09:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. The PROD process lasts 7 days - it was prod'd on Dec 2, deleted on Dec 9. Still appears non-notable at this point, and may soon find itself at WP:AFD (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Natalya Rudakova

Has two more recent acting credits, plus the first one, which was a substantial role in a high profile film. Think it's time to let her back in to Wikipedia? -Fightingirish (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Not done Not obvious enough for this board which doesn't really cover AfD. Consider to write a small draft with good sources showing that the one additional real credit has created enough coverage on her and bring it to deletion review. Probably won't work unless A Novel Romance becomes notable enough for an article. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

William "Sandy" Darity, Jr.

copyright owner -Loyalcoya (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done If you are the copyright owner, please contact WP:OTRS first, the undelete - if applicable/appropriate - will come later (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

User talk:MehranVB/Archive1

per WP:UP#DELTALK -In fact 14:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done by Bwilikins. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Ella Mae Lentz

i THINK THAT THIS ARTICLE SHOULDN'T BE DELETED BECASUE i FORGOT TO WIRTE THE REASON AS TO THE IMPORTANCE OF SUBMITTING THIS ARTICLE. THE REASON IS ELLA MAE LENTZ HAS CONTRIBUTED ALOT TO THE DEAF COMMUNITY. SHE HAS WRITTEN BOOKS, DEVELOPED PROGRAMS, AS WELL AS PERFORMED MANY SHOWS. SHE IS A REAL INFLUENCE TO THE DEAF COMMUNITY AND THATS WHY I THINK THAT THIS ARTICLE SHOULD NOT BE DELETED -Aslforever02 (talk) 18:49, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Aslforever02/Ella Mae Lentz II. There you can work on it adding the referecnes from Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ella Mae Lentz. Then please contact Toddst1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) who deleted the page. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The African Identity

I didnt have the time to make the adjustments that were needed nor do i understand all the codes for templates to provide reflist. I have all the proof of the importance to the article why the group was impactful and history of the group.. -DonMegaTV (talk) 20:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:DonMegaTV/The African Identity . You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Blackwater Worldwide arms smuggling claims

Contested PROD -Gobonobo T C 23:52, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done Although in effect a contested PROD, the article was a WP:FORK from another article to begin with. As based on ref's and PROD reasoning charges were never laid, the article would do nothing but serve to disparage a company and persons within in (contrary to WP:BLP). (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek kumar

reasoning -Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 06:39, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The page is of an upcoming actor who's film very much much hyped in Bollywood. I have added the references in the new page which is in the creation process. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Abhishek_Kumar

There's many reliable sources that talk about this actor if you search Abhishek Kumar 5 Ghantey Mien 5 Crore on the google. I have put in some of the references but the deleted page is administrator protected. Please allow this page to be created again.

  Not done My recommendation is for you is to make a userspace draft. When you have verified with a few trusted editors that it's ready to go, you may make a request at request for unprotection to have the title unprotected. Be aware that "up and coming" actors do not yet meet notability requirements, and WP:CRYSTAL applies (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

A.S. Nagarajan

The article was deleted under WP:BLPPROD. This article is NOT a Biography of a Living Person. The person in question is DECEASED, was an illustrious writer and filmmaker from the classical era of Tamil and Sri Lankan cinema, and as for verification, was my grandfather. The article was created precisely because of the lack of documentation on the internet of his career, but his IMDB page does exist at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2426080/ -Cyfanfor (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

As IMDB is not a valid WP:RS, and all articles (whether BLP or not) require sourcing, could you please advise what types of sourcing you'll be able to add? I acknowledge that this is a PROD, but the article will not be able to remain on Wikipedia without sourcing (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Hussainsha_-_Ajima.JPG

as per your request i will try to add details to the image file page . kindly guide me . -Dr Ananda Kumar Pingali (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

These images have not yet been deleted so they cannot be restored, whcih is the purpose of this board. As you're now here, let me observe that they seem to come from the organization's site, where copyright is claimed.[8]. So unless the organization decides to donate them, they will be deleted regardless of any details you add. For more information see Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Above, I referred to the fact that you as uploader have tried to grant permission. If you wnat to use images without asking for a change of their copyright, a fair use rationale may apply in some circumstances, but that's a different discourse.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thomas J. Kelly Photo.jpg

I have asked for permission and have received permission from the Public Affairs department at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center to use this copyright free Thomas J. Kelly Photo.jpg. Wikipedia should receive an e-mail from Joe Pisarchick for submission of this photo. I have asked Mr. Pisarchick to send the e-mail to photosubmission@wikimedia.org . -Davidthelion2 (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


I believe the reason it was deleted maybe the approval did not reach your department in time. This will be the second time I have asked Mr. Pisarchick to e-mail Wikipedia expressing approval of the usage of Dr. Kelly's photo. The URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_J._Kelly_(scientist) should you need the location of Dr. Kelly's biography.

I would be happy to ask Mr. Pisarchick to e-mail the admin directly should he/she need additional information. Thank you. David

  •   Not done Once OTRS has received and approved the permission, the file will be undeleted as part of the process. It may take a little time - but there's never a hurry. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

File:A549 bridges -- 7-28-at1616.jpg

I uploaded this image and someone deleted as a duplicate of another image I uploaded, but it was not a duplicate. As I recall, the focal planes were different and the images are subtly (or even significantly) different. -John Riemann Soong (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

The image looks completely identical with File:Intercellular connections in a549 cells.jpg is this the one you were thinking of? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
As I recall there were some differences between the two images. John Riemann Soong (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Could someone please restore it; the image was never placed on IFD, and was moved to Commons without my consent. John Riemann Soong (talk) 17:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
PLEASE? I uploaded the image on a free license, and it is NOT a duplicate. John Riemann Soong (talk) 03:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
They are bit-for-bit identical. Both images hash to (with MD5) 6be87eaea86c8ce92c51d46ea4b0e144. I can restore the wikipedia copy if you like but I really don't see the point. Protonk (talk) 03:10, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Please? John Riemann Soong (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Could you please undelete all images of mine that were moved to Commons -- I am trying to find a missing image that I cannot find anymore. (I planned to insert them in articles when I had the time.) John Riemann Soong (talk) 03:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
These are all your uploaded images which have ever been deleted (and moved to commons, you have other files deleted through IFD): File:A549 bridges -- 7-28-at1622.jpg, File:A549 bridges -- 7-28-at1623.jpg, File:Acetic anhydride electron density.PNG, File:3-phenylpropanoic acid derivative.jpg, File:Barbiturate.jpg, File:Intercellular connections in a549 cells.jpg. With the exception of the last one, all of these images have been moved to commons under the identical name. I will not restore those images. You may download them from commons and reupload them to wikipedia under a different name if you wish. But I don't see the point. The last one is, as I said, bit for bit identical to the commons copy, just listed under another name. If you like you can download that file from commons and reupload it to wikipedia under the original name. Again, I don't see the point. Protonk (talk) 03:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Emergn

reasoning -PDarrall (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)


The following reasons for deletion were noted.

19:37, 14 December 2011 Amatulic (talk | contribs) deleted "Emergn" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): See WP:NOTINHERITED, also WP:CSD#G11)

This is not the case.

Explanation of the subject's significance was clearly noted and inherited. The Universal Credit Programme, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Credit, one of the largest pieces of UK government legislation, the largest change to benefits since their introduction, a pioneer in the way the govt does IT projects is being led and advised publically by Emergn. Reference public articles including reference in the House of Lords. How on earth is there no inheritance. The deletion is clearly done by someone with no subject matter knowledge.

Secondly reference is made to advertising. This is flatly denied. There is no sales pitch, no sales material, everything was factual and referenced. It did not infringe the style of article necessary for Wikipedia.

There is no inheritance because WP:Notability requires every single article to stand or fall on its own merits. In other words, Article X's existence or absence CAN NOT be used to justify the presence or absence of article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
And I agree, your language looked pretty damned promotional to me, with gimmicks like testimonials from an M.P. (members of the House of Lords are certainly not considered reliable sources). --Orange Mike | Talk 20:41, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Maybe changes have been made to it which I did not start with - as I definitely would not have used a term like testimonial. Additionally the reference to the House of Lords is not the Lord himself, its to a Hansard reference - and that surely is a reliable source. The objection is to the speed of the deletion, without discussion and without any chance to rectify issues that may have occurred in the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by User:PDarrall (talk • contribs) — PDarrall (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Nonsense: you say that "Lord So-and-So mentioned Emergn in the House of Lords" as if it mattered. Hansard by definition documents almost every trivial utterance on the floor of the House; that neither makes those utterances significant, nor conveys some mystical notability because the name "Emergn" was mentioned once by a member of the Lords. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

That's a stylistic choice, its intention was not to denote 'some mystical notability'. The Lord in question makes no positive statement in regard of Emergn, he merely notes their role within a public project. However surely the case still remains, how can problems be corrected if speedy deletion process is applied out of nowhere, with no indication of the problem within the article, which I am sure could have been fixed to the standards of Wikipedia. Including, if it was felt that using the House of Lord statement was promotional. There was earlier comment in the original file on some quotes from the CEO, which were felt promotional. That was accepted and the comments were removed without objection from me personally. However I believe Emergn is as significant as some competitor companies listed within Wikipedia such as Thoughtworks. The aim is to produce something to the standard of the wikipedia, deletion prevents that. My case for reversing the deletion is the article can be improved and corrected to meet any necessary standards.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PDarrall (talk • contribs) — PDarrall (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The thing to do, then, is to create a new draft article in a sandbox such as User:PDarrall/Emergn (which I just created for you), and work on it there. Then ask some of the previous version's critics to look at the new draft and suggest improvements. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, could I ask a second favour. That you place the old deleted article also into that sandbox.— Preceding unsigned comment added by PDarrall (talk • contribs) — PDarrall (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Already done. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

tellmygov

Tellmygov is a social media network. It is in the same category that facebook is in and facebook is allowed to be left up, I don't understand why tellmygov was deleted. -MightyPen1 (talk) 22:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

ARTICLE X CANNOT BE USED TO JUSTIFY ARTICLE Y. Every article has to be notable in and of itself. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:27, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done and will not be done The deleted "article" was an advertisement by User:TellMyGov Admin, since blocked. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Tellmygov is a social media network and provides a service to all Americans in keeping them informed about the government. Facebook is allowed to remain up, Tellmygov should be allowed to remain up as well. This was deleted because it was said to be promoting the company, but it isn't promoting the company, it is informing about a social network site that is the first of it's kind, completely political in nature. The article was approved to begin with because it met all the criteria and I don't think that one user should be allowed to come along and say, oh now it's not approved because I don't like it. Wikipedia is to inform the people, this article is meant to inform the people. It doesn't deserve to be taken down. I think that once it has passed initial inspection, which it did, it shouldn't be allowed to be taken down based on one person's opinion. -MightyPen1 (talk) 22:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Facebook's article CAN NOT be used to justify this one. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused, are you saying that a user named tellmygov admin edited it last? -MightyPen1 (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Orangemike himself said, up above, if you were paying attention, that the article willn't be restored because it was an advertising piece by him. And your only edits that I can see (and the warnings on your talk page) suggest you are either he, someone editing on his behalf, or an employee; hence I have tagged your user talk page with {{sockpuppetry}}. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

I am not a sockpuppet, and I was not aware he submitted an article previously. Thank you for your help. -MightyPen1 (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey, Jeremy, let's assume good faith here! Mighty, as I implied elsewhere, I'm afraid that somebody who comes roaring in to defend what was basically an advertisement for a new website, one created by an obvious spam account, is bound to be viewed with a cynical eye; and yes, as the link given above will show you, there was an account named User:TellMyGov Admin who created the tellmygov article, and was blocked as what we call a "spamusername". --Orange Mike | Talk 00:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

First of all! TELLMYGOV ADMIN did not make any changes to the article. second, the only thing that he do is change the capitalization! but that is OK. Just for your information, you are right! it is not a social network for politics, it is a communication technology and an information portal for the american voters. tellmygov.com DO NOT want anything to do with Wikipedia! Your site is begging for money on every page! I hope you guys stay in business. Good Luck

File:Val-Dieu_Triple_Magnum.jpg

Quite awesome that a) there is no way to view the image or a thumbnail or anything anymore although you are the original uploader or a contributor in anyway; and b) even the actual metadata about the image, such as upload comment or copyright notice, is gone.

Sarcasm mode off: after some effort I have been able to find a thumbnail of the image on the interwebs, and I can confirm that it was a photograph I took myself. I am fairly certain that I also added appropriate information about that in the image information. Regardless, the image certainly is NOT non-free; if this was not properly reflected on the information this can be corrected. -Filipvr (talk) 07:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done Have to agree not being able to asses the history for a photo uploaded five years ago isn't exactly helpful. I've restored it so that you can check out that it has been tagged as 'product cover' which would not be free even though you have taken the photo, and then been deleted as being without fair use rationale. Which still needs to be fixed.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
  • I have been reviewing the situation and here are some remarks:
  1. There only was a boilerplate non-free notice posted on my talk page. Nothing about (lack of notice for) fair use or cover art being at the heart of the problem. TBH that is not very helpful either.
  2. I see in the history that an actual fair use notice was already added to the page right after it being marked for deletion. Err... somewhat contradictory actions?
  3. A few days after being marked for deletion, a bot tagged it for resize. It was deleted regardless without being resized.
  4. It is still tagged for being resized now. But according to [Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction request] and User:DASHBot#Tasks it should happen automatically? It didnt seem to have happened over the last few days since the file was restored, though. Indeed, according to [uploads] no resizing has happened since november 24th.
  5. Before I noticed the FUR on the restored image, I went looking for what to do myself. I got lost in a swamp of copyright templates and rationales. I still wouldn't know what to actually add. In fact, I now know that resizing should happen because the image was tagged that way. But I wouldn't have known without that tag. Or what size it is supposed to be at. (I can only assume now that it is max 400px in any direction because of a notice at the top of the [Category:Non-free Wikipedia file size reduction request] page)

I dont believe the photograph itself is really worth much discussion over. It's not that awesome. But the above points highlight IMO that at some points, WP processes, guidelines and "documentation" have turned wrong and could use some serious review and redesign - read: simplification. Heck, I am adding all these comments here; but it's likely not the appropriate location either.
Filipvr (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. Here it would just be archived, so I'll copy it to your page and reply there. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:59, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Donald Black LGBT author

No reference to article can be found in Deletions (archive), Deletions Review or anywhere else which suggests foul play or deletion by accidental technical error -82.31.246.206 (talk) 22:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Zhonghua Primary School (Singapore)

reasoning -Gtb2011 (talk) 11:01, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't know why it was deleted, the information I put up were all genuine.

  Not done Page was redirected, not deleted, and the requestor has since undone the redirect. January (talk) 18:11, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

amita bajpai

lots of evidences along with the article -Cheekubaaj (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

lots of evidences were provided,like external links, but still it was deleted,i think wikipedia is a pool of knowledge and it should not become so complicated.If the evidences have some authenciticity they should be given a 'go ahead' -Cheekubaaj (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

lots of evidences were given and had authentication -Cheekubaaj (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amita Bajpai, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Tom Morris (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mongols

mistakenly deleted page -––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) ✍ 05:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Aldready   Done. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Yaesu VX-1R

Please restore PRODed deletion so I can merge to Yaesu VX series as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaesu VX-2R. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC) -ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan Iilahti

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 02:39, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Abhishek Kumar

reasoning -Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 08:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Its got adequate references now. Still, its being deleted which is quite unfair as there are pages which are poorly referenced.

Andrewsymonds12 (talk) 08:59, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

CopSSH

reason for speedy deletion, the copyright violation, was an error -Efa (talk) 12:34, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

The error was already discussed with the tag admin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DanielRigal#CopSSh Please restore the CopSSH, history and talk page.

  •   Not done Copyright issues aside, there's nothing about this product that even remotely garners notability for inclusion on an encyclopedia. Indeed, the entire article was mere promotion for a product that is, (and I quote) "yet another repackaging" of an open source product. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Great Ogboru

The person contained herein the post was a nominee for the past election conducted in Delta State Nigeria. His opponent, Emmanuel Uduaghan has a wikipedia page and his contestant and opponent has none so I copied the info for the wikipedia entry from his official 2011 campaign website. please donot delete this page -Damoon4all (talk) 21:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Salvio Let's talk about it! 21:38, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Peter Grudzien

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

reasoning -108.27.114.248 (talk) 02:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Peter Grudzien is a musical artist whose albums I admire, I was hoping to find out more about him via Wikipedia, especially the details of his discography. I was surprised to see that he didn't have a page, then saw this message: "Xymmax (talk | contribs) deleted "Peter Grudzien" ‎ (WP:PROD, reason was 'Fails notability since June 2007.'.)"

I don't know what "fails notability" means in this context; I'm a lover of obscure music and Peter Grudzien is actually quite notable in that realm. Please reinstate the article, whatever it was! Thank you, Jeffrey NYC

A very valuable resource of information on the artist & author Austin Osman Spare. Fulgur Limited produces rare books and articles that are not available in the U.S.

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

reasoning -97.126.30.246 (talk) 02:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Fulgur Limited (Robert Ansel) provides material that is difficult if not impossible to obtain on Austin Osman Spare. Spare is a very collectable artist and author whose work dates back to world war one. Spare's works on writing that many particular newer writers such as: Andrew Chumbley, Aleister Crowley, W.B. Yeats and others, have printed books that only Fulgur Limited can provide at this time. Austin Osman Spare or AOS has been highly acclaimed by authors Gavin Simple and Kenneth Grant (who has since past on) brings to the surface Spares magical writings. Spare was able to make the magical connection with the either/either the dualism or bicameral brain to which Spare created his own magical Alphabet that is related to our very consciousness using symbols that only the conscious can understand on a level that reality understands as the senses. Though the field is specialized and still regarded in it's infancy in today's society, those researching this stage in the process as a necessary move forward, would be like a person graduating from High School to College. I myself have been working with Spare for twenty-years and the magical alphabet and words, creating a dictionary or lexicon for personal use of which one day, I would love to share my findings with many other Spare enthusiasts that would find my dedicated work useful in works previously published by Fulgur Limited. Before we proceed to delete and unknown just because we may fear it, to face it, may bring change that the world so rightly deserves.

  •   Not done You have mentioned many subjects, but I'm not sure what article you're actually looking to have undeleted - indeed, your discussion looks more like an WP:AFD comment. One way or another, this is a malformed request and cannot be actionned (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:45, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Midnight storm

It should not be deleted because i just put it up and had no chance to edit it. Also this article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is about a starting out band that needs any suport it can get. Also it is a real band you can see it on face book. We will be posting some songs on youtube soon, so please Reconsider the deletion of this page do to its verifiable and its lack of importance. at least wait and see how many people visit this page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockband12 (talk • contribs)

Etymotic

Etymotic are an important company in audio-circles and develop components for many popular brands. Regardless of the quality of the old article, they should have an article on wikipedia. Ideally, the old content should be resurrected so that it can be rewritten, cited, improved etc. -Jim no.6 (talk) 12:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The page was just a redirect to Etymotic Research; assuming you want the latter to be undeleted, then I'm sorry, but this is a   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Fastily (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

meyhem lauren

reasoning -Vza2k (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

...  Not done Thanks for bringing this article to our attention. Since your report it has been added to the articles for discussion queue. You may follow the link from the article itself to comment there. Ensure you do not remove the AFD tag yourself, and that you familiarize yourself withe the deletion process and the types of policy-based arguments you should make. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:43, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

File:P1080401.JPG

Request temporary undeletion to establish authorship for File:P1080401-Detail.JPG and Commons:File:Pu-erh tea.JPG. -Kelly hi! 22:54, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

FYI, not sure if image was originally uploaded here or at Commons. If at Commons, apologies. Kelly hi! 22:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
  Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. you had better ask a commons admin. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Dhulappa Bhaurao Navale(Anna)

Dhulappa Bhaurao Navale was born in a Chaturth Jain family at Ankalkhop on 15 January 1910.He completed his education till matric.After complition of education he started social work in Ankalkhop & surrounding villages. In year 1934 he was elected as a president of Ankalkhop Vivid Karyakari sahakari Society.During this period he came in touch with Swami Ramanand Bharti & V.S.Page.

  • In 1937 Local Board elections he with his friends Gaurihar Sihasane & Sakharam Retharekar were congress candidates.All the three were elected from Satara Dist.against Kooper party supported by British.He had started the Congress party campaign from Ankalkhop-Audumber in 1937. Since then there is a tradition of Sangli Dist. Congress party to start its campaign from Audumber-Ankalkhop.
  • He was the first individual Satyaghari of Mahatma Gandhi from Satara District (in which Sangli Dist. was also included).He made his satyagraha in Bhilawadi in 1940. He was arrested & was sent to Yerawada jail.He participated & lead Ankalkhop,Audumber & Bhilwadi in Tasgaon,Bilashi & Islampur Satyagraha.He was a great freedom fighter & was jailed twice by Britishers. He was very close friend of Late Yeshwantrao B.Chavan,Swami Ramanand Bharti,V.S.Page,Nana Patil,G.D.Lad,Nagnath Naikwadi,S.M.Joshi,G.D.Madgulkar,Vasantrao(Dada)Banduji Patil,Dhondiram Mali,Barde Guruji,Gaurihar Sihasane,Kutte(Tasgaon),Dattoba Surywanshi,Dr. Sawant (Panchgani),Br.G.D.Patil,Balasaheb Desai,Rajaram(Bapu)Patil,P.D.Patil(Karad)& Babasaheb Patil(Yelavi).
  • He was elected as first chairperson of Sangli District school committee (Now called as President of Zilla Parishad).
  • He was elected as a president of Sangli District congress. In his tenure he requested a land from His Highness Chintmanrao Patwardhan of Sangli for head quarter of Congress committee at Sangli & it was immediately allotted by Chintamanrao Patwardhan.
  • He was founder of Shetkari Sahakari Sakar Karkhana Sangli (Now Vasantdada Shetkari Shakari Sakar Karkhana Ltd.Sangli). He gave the name to Sangli sugar factory,as "Shetkari" in the first meeting held & everyone liked it & accepted it.He was vice-chairman for several years of V.S.S.S.K.
  • He was MLC from 1962 to 1971 from Satara & Sangli Dist.
  • He made the historic (Preeti Sangam) re-union of his both friends Mr.Y.B.Chavan & Vasantdada Patil in his native village Ankalkhop on 24 May 1982.After that re-union Vasantdada Patil became three times Chief Minister of Maharashtra.
  • He was elected as Secretary of freedom fighter organisation of Maharashtra Government. Which was equivalent to cabinet portfolio.
  • He was a founder & was a prominent leader in several co-operative organizations & educational institutions in Sangli District.He died on 30 Sept.1988 Abhi.sach1111 (talk) 08:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Kazoku gemu affiche.jpg

not my image, I will fix licensing, thanks -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

  Done you have till 28th to provide a rationale and use image Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

NGenius Infinistream

This was a comman packet sniffer product used in industry. It had a mention in packet sniffer wiki page and also in the comparison of packet sniffer page on wiki. It will help people compare similiar product as I was doing it. -~ Roshan Pinto (talk) 11:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done WP:PUFFERY such as "best-in-class packet flow intelligent deep packet capture" is pure advertising. It's an appliance, and is not independently notable. Being "mentioned" is one thing, being mentioned as notable is another (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Portrait stories

reasoning Please do not delete the definition of Portrait Stories which is a neutral viewpoint of definition of portrait photography from a storytelling point of view. The founder of the business, Portrait Stories, is Ginger McNamara Saucier which you can remove the link. -GingerSaucier (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

File:JamieMoyerInningsPitched.jpg

administrator claimed I did not provide a rationale for fair use. I think he missed it because I did. My rationale was "only using a small portion of the copyrighted work". -Tzadik (talk) 17:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

  •   Not done In general it is insufficient to say that a non-free photo uses a small portion of a copyrighted work. You may want to read Wikipedia's policy on non-free content which will explain what is needed to justify a non-free image and why that justification is required. Protonk (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I wrote the portion of the "Practical Usage" section of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ternary_numeral_system which deals with the use of the ternary numeral system in baseball statistics. The image I uploaded was a tiny portion of a baseball card which included only a portion of 1 column of numbers. The statistics themselves are not copyrighted, but the image is an important compliment to the article because it shows a real, practical use of the ternary system in everyday life. That really seems like fair use to me. There is no alternative to getting my point across than showing something that was published in print. Tzadik (talk) 17:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Syamsir Alam

the reason for deletion was said as: Non-notable youth player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL). but the fact, he is one of the brightest talent in Indonesian football. next year he'll play in Belgium 2nd tier division with CS Vise. here are some links about him : http://www.goal.com/en/news/14/asia/2011/12/06/2789924/belgiums-cs-vise-officially-sign-indonesian-youngster http://www.cs-vise.be/en/syamsir-alam-aiming-vise -110.136.147.130 (talk) 00:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_57&oldid=1142508400"