Wikipedia:Peer review/Columbia University/archive2

Columbia University edit

Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to FA quality.

Thanks, alphalfalfa(talk) 03:10, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Sdkb

Overall, I think this article needs a lot of cleaning before it'll be ready for an FAC. Given that it passed GA in 2011, it's likely fallen below GA standards in a bunch of areas, so it needs to be brought back up to more solid GA ground before reaching for FA heights. Specific notes:

  • I'd remove among them a co-author of the United States Constitution and a co-author of the Declaration of Independence from the lead. It's almost never WP:DUE for any one alum to be so important to an institution as to warrant mention in the lead. five Founding Fathers is plenty enough.
  • There are spelling and grammar issues, such as the slash at the start of the campus section (see MOS:SLASH) and capitalization of "city".
  • The undergraduate admissions section should have {{Infobox U.S. college admissions}} added.
  • More prose concerns: New York Times needs italicization.
  • "Military and veteran enrollment" probably shouldn't be its own section, and is promo-y.
  • Student body demographics are outdated.
  • Columbia is home to two pioneers in undergraduate campus radio broadcasting needs strong sourcing, not no sourcing.
  • I suspect the sectioning and weighting of student activities coverage needs revising.
  • The paragraph listing all the speakers at the Global Leaders Forum is crufty and needs to go. A single visit to a campus by any one person is not sufficiently notable that an encyclopedic account of the institution needs to mention it.
  • The galleries of notable alumni and faculty are very WP:UNDUE and need to go; this has been discussed recently at WT:HED I believe.
  • The see also section needs to be trimmed of links mentioned in the body.
  • We don't need to link to the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica in the external links; it's more than a little outdated.

These are just samples of issues I found skimming the page; they're by no means a comprehensive list of all I'd find if I scoured it top to bottom. If you'd like to set this up for FAC, you'll need to do so with an eye for these sorts of things. Good luck, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 07:11, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]