Wikipedia:Peer review/Aries (album)/archive2

Aries (album)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

.

I am requesting this article for a peer review to ensure that it meets FA standards. I have previously made two FAs about an article by this artist (Romance (Luis Miguel album) and Romances (Luis Miguel album)) and want to get feedback before nominating this for FA. Erick (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Erick (talk) 23:23, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Carbrera

I would suggest adding a source to back up the overall genre of the album in the infobox
The "favorable" review score from Billboard is likely non-encyclopedic; remove it from the "Professional ratings" box, but by all means keep it in the "Critical reception" section
Music critics should be linked to the article for "Music journalism"
The "Commercial reception" and "Critical reception" sections should be flipped
Producer(s) should be credited in the "Track listing" info
There should be a source for the "Track listing" within the section
Instead of using ";-" in the "Credits and personnel" section, you should use this " –" (Copy and paste from the "Edit" box to receive the correct format of what I'm suggesting.)
Combine the two 1993 and 1994 chart peaks into one: 1993–94
Add "rowheader=true" in each countries' chart box
There is a random blank box below the certification entry for Mexico
Reference 1 should be linked to "AllMusic" and be spelt as "AllMusic" instead of "Allmusic"; additionally, AllMusic is a publication, not a work
I would double-check all references to make sure the above problem isn't anywhere else

That's what I have to say (for now!) I'd be glad to help you out if you ever need anything! Just lemme know! Regards, Carbrera (talk) 04:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Carbrera! Thanks for your input, I believed I have addressed the issues that you have brought up. Erick (talk) 16:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude Yes, with just a few slight changes the article definitely looks better. Just one more thing: If the album is also considered part of the R&B genre, should the WikiProject for it be tagged on the talk page? Just a small observation. :) Carbrera (talk) 21:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess. I mean, if they don't have a problem with it, then I don't see why not.Erick (talk) 01:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Carbrera: By the sound of things, it looks like the article is pretty much set to go for FAC. I always appreciate the feedback even if I think the article is ready. If nothing else needs to be done, then I'd like to close this PR and get the FAC started. Thanks again for your feedback! :) Erick (talk) 17:27, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Carbrera: Real quick before I close this PR, I've discovered that "Mi Niego a Estar Solo" was released as a promo single only in Spain. (Source). Is the way I presented in the article fine? Erick (talk) 20:52, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magiciandude: Yes, that looks fine to me! Carbrera (talk) 00:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will now close this PR to start the FAC. Wish me luck! Erick (talk) 05:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]