Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of viverrids/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:46, 27 September 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of viverrids edit

Featured list candidates/List of viverrids/archive1

Nominator(s): Pres N 23:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We return to my animals-in-a-family series (previously: felids/canids/mustelids/procyonids/ursids/mephitids) after a couple months with list #7: viverrids, encompassing the 33 species of viverridae split primarily between the civets and the genets, aka the "mongoose-y cats". Unlike the previous lists, which usually had at least a couple well-known examples, many English-speaking readers may have never even heard of these animals, as they're a group of relatively small carnivores mainly hiding away in the jungles, forests, and shrublands of Africa and southeast Asia. As a result, we're missing images for a few of the rarer African genets, and a few others have to make do with drawings. As always, the list format is based on the prior lists and reflects FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! --Pres N 23:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Under the common genet, I can see "eg. inland cliffs" - is the use of a single dot a typo? Or is that how it is written in US English (where I am we would either use two dots or none at all, but maybe it's different over there.....?)
TBH I think that's all I have - great work as ever...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude: - nope, it's supposed to be e.g., which is how I missed it when removing those asides. Now fixed. --Pres N 20:46, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Couldn't find anything — nice work. ~ HAL333 20:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice as usual, nothing caught my eye. Reywas92^Talk 20:57, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – All of the references are to high-quality reliable sources and are formatted well. The link-checker shows no issues, and overall the source review is a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.