Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of unusual deaths/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of unusual deaths edit

Featured list candidates/List of unusual deaths/archive1

Nominator(s): Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I went through this list thinking I would just fix the heading that read "The List," I then read over it some more and realized that this list is very well composed, is one of the most engaging lists that I have read in a while. I believe that it meets the criteria and is deserving of FL status. Any feedback will be reacted upon swiftly and is greatly welcome. (Note:I will rewrite the lead.) Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:FLC! This isn't a great start, though ... you've made one edit to the page, and I couldn't find anywhere in your recent contributions where you've contacted any of the people who did work on the page. So let's start there: do some work on the page, and talk with some of the people who've worked on it so far to see if they think it's ready to become a Featured List. - Dank (push to talk) 02:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and suggest withdrawal. the lead is pretty much empty. There is a bare URL (ref. #295). So many unreliable sources (NY Post, Cracked.com, Chm.bris.ac.uk). Inconsistencies with source formatting (publishers/works are randomly linked and book sources are cited both in References and works cited). There are also so many {{sfn}}'s that don't point to any citations (e.g. ref. 72, 91, 92, 94, 95). Also, "Note:I will rewrite the lead." is not something that is done at FLC. When a list is nominated for FL, it is expected to meet or nearly meet all the FL criteria. This list is far from reaching the FL standards. FrB.TG (talk) 05:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - unfortunately just not ready at this point. Lead consists of a single sentence. Reworking the article to something close to FL standard should take place before the nomination -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:46, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WP:FLC director and delegates: the nominator has withdrawn their nomination. FrB.TG (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving. --Pres N 16:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.