Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Azerbaijan/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of World Heritage Sites in Azerbaijan edit
List of World Heritage Sites in Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
With the Czech republic just being promoted, I am nominating the list of WHS in Azerbaijan. There are three sites and 10 tentative sites. The style follows the standard for these lists. Tone 07:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tone: - the rubric at the top of the page says "Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". You literally only started one yesterday which has as yet had no comments at all...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Image review – Pass edit
- All of the images used in the article are uploaded by the user on Wikimedia commons under suitable licence. Also, I noticed that "Lok-Batan" Mud Cone does have an image (File:Mud vulcanoes azerbaijan gobustan.JPG). I'll suggest you to use it in the list. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:42, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Kavyansh.Singh: According to the file name, that picture is from Gobustan, which is another location. I removed it from the Lok Batan article, which is in Absheron. --Tone 20:08, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tone – No real issues with the licencing, so Pass for image review. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from TRM
edit
- "Following the breakup of Soviet Union" again, this isn't in the UNESCO source.
- "2003 to 2009.[4] " and after 2009? Was it repaired? Should be covered here.
- "earthquake.[7][4]" ref order.
- "Maiden tower"->"Maiden Tower"
- "40.000 " 40,000
- "Greater Caucasus Mountains" no need to capitalise mountains.
- "(Fire - worshippers, temple - museum at Surakhany)" en-dashes, not hyphens.
- "rich in fossils from" no need to link common English words.
- Cells with no images, put in a centrally aligned en-dash or something to indicate that there's not one available, not that you just forgot.
- "50 000 bones" 50,000
- "at the altitude of" -> "at an elevation of"
- "Mountains, at the altitude of 2,300 metres" similar to before, no need to capitalise mountain, and "at an elevation of"
- "Khinalig - medieval" en-dash.
- Use the {{reflist}} template.
- Refs 11 and 19 need en-dash.
That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Fixed, thank you! --Tone 08:53, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: A courtesy ping, could you check if the changes are fine? --Tone 17:55, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Could you check this one, please ;) --Tone 09:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from ChrisTheDude edit
- "The petroglyphs on rocky boulders at Gobustan document the human presence in the area spanning 40,000 years. There are over 6000 rock carvings" - any reason why one number is written with a comma and the other without?
- Made it 6,000.
- "There are three areas with petroglyphs within the buffer zone" - what's a "buffer zone"?
- Removed, this is redundant anyway. Buffer zone is the area surrounding the main site where special protection is still in place.
- "with the height of 70 metres" => "with a height of 70 metres"
- That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Fixed, thanks! --Tone 06:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
AryKun edit
Really nice work here, very little I could find wrong with this.
- "first site inscribed to the list" → "first site added to the list" would be better
- "Sheki" → "Shaki"? Not necessary, though.
- mausoleum of Nakichevan → mausoleums of Nakhichevan?
- Although not needed, a review at the FLC for List of birds of Nauru would be appreciated.
Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 19:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.