Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls edit

Featured list candidates/List of ICC Men's T20 World Cup five-wicket hauls/archive1

Nominator(s): RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article deserves to be a featured list. Made the list in accordance with the FL criteria. So, I am glad to present it for review and looking forward to your feedback. RoboCric (talk) 06:14, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

" In a T20I, each team plays single innings," => " In a T20I, each team plays a single innings,"
"The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match as well as any T20I match was" => "The first five-wicket haul in an ICC Men's T20 World Cup match, as well as in any T20I match, was"
"who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup till date" => "who picked up 6 wickets for 8 runs, recording the best bowling figures in the T20 World Cup to date" ("till date" is not an expression in English)
"He set the remarkable record" - calling it remarkable is not WP:NPOV
"Rangana Herath's fifer against New Zealand on 31 March 2014, is" - no reason for that comma to be there
"Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan is the first player" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman of Afghanistan was the first player"
"on T20 World Cup debut" => "on his T20 World Cup debut"
Image caption: "Mujeeb Ur Rahman is the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut" => "Mujeeb Ur Rahman was the first player to pick up a five-wicket haul on his ICC Men's T20 World Cup debut." (note the full stop at the end) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Fixed all the issues you raised. Waiting for your further review or opinion. RoboCric (talk) 08:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Harrias edit

"..with bowling figures of 5 wickets for 6 runs.." Explain what this means, and consider linking to Bowling analysis.
"..the first player from associate nations to.." This would seem better as "..the first player from an associate nation to.."
"Rangana Herath's fifer against.." "fifer" isn't encyclopaedic language.
"He grabbed five wickets conceding.." Similarly, in this context, "grabbed" isn't encyclopaedic language.
"He averaged 0.60 in that match, which is also the best average for.." Provide the wikilink on the first, not second, use of "average" here.
Be consistent throughout the article whether to use numbers or words for the number of wickets.
In the table, large and well-known cities such as London, Perth, Chittagong, Kolkata etc shouldn't be linked, per the MOS.
The "Season overview" table needs row scopes.
Both images need appropriate and descriptive alt text.

That's it from me. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 13:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – no response from the nominator in four weeks, and concerns remain unresolved. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Harrias Done, I have fixed all the issues. I am really really sorry that I was very late. Actually I was completely out of online for 60 days due to my training purposes. I admit that it was my fault. I should have given a pre-notice here about my unavailability/wiki-break. I would be careful about this from the next time. Now I hope that you would reconsider about your opinion regarding this list. Robo^Cric Let's chat 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Harrias: Do you still oppose this nomination? --Pres N 17:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source review – Pending edit

Will do soon. Aza24 (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Dating missing for SportsAustralia ref 1
Page number missing for ref 5
Date missing in ref 7
Author & date missing in ref 8
Date missing in ref 9
Date missing ref 10
Author & date missing in ref 11
Author & date missing ref 13
Date missing ref 15
Date missing in ref 20, Daily sun
Date (& editor?) missing in ref 23, India Today (scroll to bottom of the page)

Reliability

ref 17, Sportskeeda, is not a reliable source. Should be switched
Looks okay otherwise

Verifiability

Spotchecked a few. Found no issues – Aza24 (talk) 15:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, again I am coming very late online. Sorry to say I won't be able to fix it for next 1 month. I will try if i get onlin. Pls wait for some time with patience. Robo^Cric Let's chat 04:39, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but your nomination has been here for 4 months with one support and one oppose. I would recommend you consider asking it is archived if you don't have to time to pursue it at the moment. You can always renominate it. Aza24 (talk) 17:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.