Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1976/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1976 edit
List of Hot Country Singles number ones of 1976 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The latest list of country number one songs by year. Thus far this little project of mine has produced 40 FLs, so here's the potential #41, covering a year in which everyone was crazy for CB radio and Johnny Cash built a mad car in song, after which some guy built it for real......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Image review (pass) edit
- File:One piece at a time cropped.jpg I would be amazed if the copyright adopted from File:One piece at a time.jpg is right on this one. Do we have any evidence to support that this is actually the work of "Abernathyautoparts~commonswiki"?
- Well, Abernathy Autoparts is the name of the firm that built the car, according to the source........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm. Could you overhaul the image description page: the date needs to reflect the original date of the image (April 1976), though keep the upload date too, and in the author expand on the uploader details, along with the fact that they were the firm that built the car. That should suffice, unless we find anything else out. Even if it isn't the right tag, it would probably be covered by {{PD-Pre1978}}, I don't know if that is worth mentioning? Harrias talk 10:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, Abernathy Autoparts is the name of the firm that built the car, according to the source........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The other three images are all appropriately tagged. Harrias talk 09:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review (pass) edit
- The article is well-sourced to reliable sources.
- Sources are formatted appropriately and consistently.
- No dead links.
- Ref #2 needs an endash, rather than hyphen in the year range in the title.
- Sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Same with ref #4.
- Sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Ref #13 needs a page number.
- Sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
--Harrias talk 09:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank edit
- Hey, if Harrias gets a subsection, so do I. I really enjoy your Hot Country Singles lists, Chris, takes me back ... I listened to a little bit of everything back then, and some of these crossed over.
- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing. Which is especially problematic when we've got a nominator who does know what he's doing. Oh well.
- Chris, I don't know what your position is on archiving using IABot. On the upside, it's just one click to do them all, but on the downside, it adds a lot of characters for not much benefit. Your call.
- YMMV, but for my taste, the second sentence is a little long and winding. You could lose "in 52 issues of the magazine" without any harm, I think.
- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- "Maggard, real name Jay Huguely, would": Any objection to "Maggard (real name Jay Huguely) would"?
- Changed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm checking all the non-ref links in the table ... so far, I've avoided one redirect. (Some people find that useful for titles ... feel free to revert.)
- "Waylon & Willie": I don't get why it's not Waylon Jennings & Willie Nelson.
- That's how it was credited - see this picture of the single itself -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- FLC criteria:
- You make excellent use of images, but this isn't an image review, per se.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources (but this isn't a source review). All retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it is not a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements.
- 6. It is stable.
- Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. I might or might not claim 5 points in the Wikicup for this sad little review. (In my defense, there wasn't much to do!) - Dank (push to talk) 19:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you most kindly for your review -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
| Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
|---|
Comments –
—Bloom6132 (talk) 19:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – all comments addressed. Looks to me like it meets all 6 FL criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. --PresN 18:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.