Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Bangladesh Premier League five-wicket hauls/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Bangladesh Premier League five-wicket hauls

Featured list candidates/List of Bangladesh Premier League five-wicket hauls/archive1

Nominator(s): PGhosh ^(Hello!) 15:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this list fulfills all the FL criteria. Along with this, many other fifer lists are promoted to featured status. So I nominate this article. Thanks in advance PGhosh ^(Hello!) 15:24, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Harrias ^talk

References:

Use a unified date format, references #9 and #10 use YYYY-MM-DD, while the rest use DD Month YYYY.
A number of the sources have access dates that are before this article was created.
Ref #4 doesn't have an access date.
Ref #6 has ESPNcricinfo, most have ESPNcricinfo, while some have Cricinfo. Be consistent.
Ref #1 has "Firstname surname", while ref #3 has "Surname, Firstname" (well initials). Be consistent.

Prose: Some significant issues here.

"..has been held annually since its first season in 2012.[4] Though Following the match fixing scandal, the league was not played in the year 2014." Clunky language which more or less contradicts itself. Should be completely rewritten to blend together better and more properly present the facts. Also, get rid of the rogue capital letter.
"It started again at year 2015, the third season of this tournament." Again, clunky language.
"..and a bowling average of 1.20 in that match." Bowling average isn't really a statistic that is used within a match, this is pretty meaningless.
"No Bowler has ever.." Another rogue capital letter, and repetition of a fact presented in the opening paragraph.
Remove the word "respectively" from the following sentence.
"Though, if the statistics of all 15 teams are taken into count, then players of the franchises from Rajshahi has taken the highest number of five-wicket haul. One player from Duronto Rajshahi and two player from Rajshahi Kings has achieved this feat." This needs to be made clearer; a layperson is not going to understand that the franchises have transcended teams without more explanation. Also, it should be "taken into account".
"..in a Bangladesh Premier League Match." No need for a capital m.
"The 2017 season also known as BPL5 has seen.." Add commas: "The 2017 season, also known as BPL5, has seen.." You probably need a reference for it being known as that too.
"Four five-wicket hauls had been taken in that season." Use "were taken" rather than "had been taken".
The first three sentences of the final paragraph all refer to each other, but don't really work as separate sentences. Work to blend them together.

Oppose overall, the prose currently falls a long way short of the standards required for Featured content on Wikipedia. Harrias ^talk 12:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pratyya Ghosh these comments have been here four days, and your editing patterns have been very sporadic. Will you address these or should I archive the nomination? I'll give you a few days to respond before archiving without prejudice. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.