Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/LCD Soundsystem discography/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:05, 18 April 2012 [1].

LCD Soundsystem discography edit

LCD Soundsystem discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire. 08:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets all of the criteria. What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire. 08:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 14:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
  • "which became one of the famous indie releases of 2002." Can we really call this song "famous" when it didn't even chart anywhere?
Is "well-known" okay? The source does say "most talked-about release".
  • "The album was the first LCD Soundsystem to debut in the top ten of the Billboard 200". Missing a word before the band's name.
Reworded.
  • What makes Sputnikmusic (ref 1) a reliable source? Our article on it says it has wiki-like features, and wikis aren't reliable sources.
Replaced.
  • Ref 11 has all caps in the title, which shouldn't appear like that even if the website has them.
Fixed.
  • Publisher of ref 14 (Entertainment Weekly) should be italicized.
Done.
  • What makes Stereogum (refs 10, 33, 36–37, and 46) reliable? It's a blog, and blogs aren't normally reliable either.
All sources replaced.
I still see the last one (now 45), which is citing a music video director. Giants2008 (Talk) 14:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, misplaced the citation. Fixed now. What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire. 14:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 41 needs to have a publisher listed.
Done.
  • In ref 40, the hyphen in the title should be an en dash. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:27, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Added. What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire. 13:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image review: The one image used appears to be free and properly tagged. Goodraise 12:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 14:41, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • You should put (EP) after "extended plays" in the lead since the abbreviation is used in the infobox and the heading of the table without an explicit abbreviation appearing anywhere.
Done.
  • "released... release. ... released ... releasing ..." repetitive.
Reworded.
  • "US[15][5]" Would prefer to see the refs in numerical order.
Fixed.
  • "third and final album" _studio_ album.
Added, I think.
  • The source says Confuse the Marketplace came out on 10 December, not 11 December.
Fixed.
  • I don't see the release date of the A Bunch of Stuff EP anywhere in that source.
Replaced.
  • The source says Introns would be released on 14 March, not 13 March. And has no year.
Fixed, and I think the year is implied since that's the year the article was published.
  • I don't see the release date of the 45:33 Remixes in that source.
Replaced.
  • I haven't checked that all references to the singles which didn't chart reference the year of release, but please could you and confirm they all do?
Done.
  • Two blank entries for Directors, either fill them in or add note to say these are unknown.
Done.
  • Be consistent with author names in the refs, either First Last or Last, First.
Fixed.
  • Ref 29 looks like it has a spare "
That's part of the title. As in, a 7". Replaced it anyway, since it didn't have the year.
  • Ref 31 has a ! followed by a . which is bad, you'll need to fool the template by pipelinking Yahoo! to Yahoo (without the !).

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:55, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire. 14:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support only issue spotted was that ref 7 doesn't come after punctuation, other than that, great work. NapHit (talk) 22:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks great to me. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/LCD_Soundsystem_discography/archive1&oldid=1138480776"